The Responsibility of the Physician and the Hospital When the Patients Withdraw their Previous Consent for Treatment

The article "Referral to the patient for permission to receive treatment" is one of the articles on jurisprudential maps and medical law. The subject matter of the present study is not limited in scope to the patient's initial objection, inability to express the patient's consent, or satisfaction; Rather, the argument for the patient's recourse to permission with a general approach is based on the acquittal of the physician and the hospital or their guarantee,

The researcher uses a descriptive-analytical method to strengthen the legal structure of doctors and hospital managers and with a new insight into the second paragraph of Article 308 BC, intends not to refuse treatment by a doctor if the patient consents to the previous permission,

Physician liability and penal policies towards those whose sole purpose is to treat patients are far from fair; Therefore, by reviewing the laws and replacing the civil liability of the government, we can strengthen the responsible, feeling and committed medical community.

As a result, doctors have cited the reasons for preventing self-harm and the prohibition of induction of death, the rule of medicine and the moral responsibility of the physician for not referring the patient after the initial (former) permission;, patients, by arguing for self-domination. Therefore, it is appropriate for the legislator to remove the government's liability for the physician's actions or for not seeking permission from the contract to resolve disputes over the physician's discharge or guarantee.