The Role and Position of the Administrative JusticeTribunal in Reasoning, Documenting and Justifying the Judgments of the Quasi-Judicial Authorities

Today, in addition to the judiciary and courts of justice, there are authorities under the headings ofcouncil, board, commission, etc., which according to special laws deal with some complaints and disputes andlawsuits, one side of which means the government, and like courts of justice in nature Issue a verdict and ajudicial opinion. These authorities, which are often supervised by the executive branch and are created with theclaim that the issues are specialized, complex and technical, with the aim of accuracy, speed and accuracy of thefinal decision, both in accordance with some constitutional principles and ordinary laws and regulations. Theruling intellect, logic and custom are obliged to issue their final opinions and opinions in a reasoned, justifiedand documented manner to the laws, principles and legal rules. Otherwise, the Court of Administrative Justice,as the reviewing authority of such opinions, will not give them legal validity and legal existence in order toensure the rule of law and the realization of rights or annulment. In the present article, with regard to examplesof opinions issued by quasi-judicial authorities and the Court of Administrative Justice, the above issue isexamined and analyzed.