Comparison of Fractional D&C with uterine Pathology in Determining the Causes of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding in women of Premenopausal and Postmenopausal Stage

Abstract:
Introduction
Abnormal uterine bleeding in pre and post menopausal period may be caused by of benign or malignant causes in endometrium or endocervix that need careful investigations by multiple diagnostic methods such as dilatation and curettage, diagnostic hysterectomy, endometrial biopsy and tran’s vaginal biopsy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of fractional D&C in assessment of abnormal uterine bleeding. Methods and Materials: In this descriptive study 156 women between 35 to 7 years old were admitted because of abnormal uterine bleeding after ruling out pregnancy, hormonal disorder and coagulation disorders. The study was done in 2002 and patients underwent fractional D&C and then hysterectomy because of histological findings or persistence of symptoms. The results were compared with histological findings of the hysterectomy specimen (gold standard) and were evaluated for sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of these methods.
Results
In all focal and diffuse uterine disease fractional D&C was 29.5% sensitive and 88.2% specific and its positive predictive value was 76.5% and its negative predictive value was 49.2%. In endometrial pathologies (such as hyperplasia and …) its sensitivity was 68.4% and its specificity was 98.3% and positive and negative predictive value were 92.9% and 90.6% respectively. 100% of lyomyoma and adenomyosis cases, 66.6% of endometrial polyp cases and 2.5% of different endometrial hyperplasia cases were miss-diagnosed in fractional D&C.
Conclusion
Fractional D&C is not a reliable method for diagnosis of focal uterine diseases such as myoma or adenomyosis and also endometrial polyps but it is useful in the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia. Based on to the costs of fractional D& C compared with other diagnostic methods and its pathologic results, routine use of this method in evaluation of AUB is not recommended.
Language:
Persian
Published:
Iranina Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Infertility, Volume:9 Issue: 2, 2007
Page:
73
magiran.com/p388746  
دانلود و مطالعه متن این مقاله با یکی از روشهای زیر امکان پذیر است:
اشتراک شخصی
با عضویت و پرداخت آنلاین حق اشتراک یک‌ساله به مبلغ 1,390,000ريال می‌توانید 70 عنوان مطلب دانلود کنید!
اشتراک سازمانی
به کتابخانه دانشگاه یا محل کار خود پیشنهاد کنید تا اشتراک سازمانی این پایگاه را برای دسترسی نامحدود همه کاربران به متن مطالب تهیه نمایند!
توجه!
  • حق عضویت دریافتی صرف حمایت از نشریات عضو و نگهداری، تکمیل و توسعه مگیران می‌شود.
  • پرداخت حق اشتراک و دانلود مقالات اجازه بازنشر آن در سایر رسانه‌های چاپی و دیجیتال را به کاربر نمی‌دهد.
In order to view content subscription is required

Personal subscription
Subscribe magiran.com for 70 € euros via PayPal and download 70 articles during a year.
Organization subscription
Please contact us to subscribe your university or library for unlimited access!