Distress and Constriction

uridical rules are propositions that have many applications in different chapters of the jurisprudence and have great effects on the final inference of the religious commandments. The rule of negation of constriction is one of the rules that says when the accomplishment of a commandment becomes hard and doing it has much hardship for the person who is responsible, that command will be removed and its performance will not be necessary. In another words, this rule confine the generalities of the arguments of the commandments. In this paper, as well as the consideration of the concepts of the distress and constriction, the reasons of this rule (verses, narrations, consensus and reason) will be studied in detail and the realm of their indication will be explained.