Efficacy of Deferasirox (Exjade®) versus Osveral® in Treatment of Iron Overload in Patients with Beta- thalassemia Major in Iran; A Non-randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract:
Background
Iron chelators are an important part of management of patients with thalassemia. It is prudent to compare efficacy of different iron chelators in treatment of iron overload in these patients who receive regular blood transfusion. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of available oral iron chelator; Deferasirox (Exjade®) with Deferasirox (Osveral®) in reducing iron overload in patients with β-thalassemia major.
Methods
Children suffering from β-thalassemia major referring to Mofid Children Hospital were enrolled in this non-randomized clinical trial. The patients were divided into two groups receiving Deferasirox (Exjade®) versus Deferasirox (Osveral®) and their response to either treatment was assessed by measurement of serum ferritin levels and estimation of cardiac and liver iron by MRI T2* of heart and liver. Efficacy of either medication was compared before and after 12 months of treatment. Serum ferritin levels were measured every three months. Mean serum ferritin at baseline was compared with post-treatment values. MRI T2* of heart and liver was performed before and after treatment.
Results
Out of 69 patients with a mean age of 13.6±7.4 years, 42 (60.9%) were male. 30 patients were assigned to take Deferasirox (Exjade®) and 39 patients to take Deferasirox (Osveral®). The groups were not different regarding the age and the gender (P=0.18 and 0.621, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in post-treatment serum ferritin level measurements between the two groups. In patients who received Osveral®, decrease in liver iron overload was significant (0.99 ms in Exjade® group vs 1.16 ms in Osveral® group, p=0.007). In the group of patients who received Exjade®, decrease in cardiac iron overload was significant (4.52 in Exjade group vs. 1.71 in Osveral group, P
Conclusion
Deferasirox (Osveral®), the iron chelator manufactured in Iran, was as efficient as Deferasirox (Exjade®) in iron removal and could be a substitute for Deferasirox (Exjade®).
Language:
English
Published:
Iranian Journal of Blood and Cancer, Volume:8 Issue: 4, Des 2016
Pages:
103 to 107
magiran.com/p1641893  
دانلود و مطالعه متن این مقاله با یکی از روشهای زیر امکان پذیر است:
اشتراک شخصی
با عضویت و پرداخت آنلاین حق اشتراک یک‌ساله به مبلغ 1,390,000ريال می‌توانید 70 عنوان مطلب دانلود کنید!
اشتراک سازمانی
به کتابخانه دانشگاه یا محل کار خود پیشنهاد کنید تا اشتراک سازمانی این پایگاه را برای دسترسی نامحدود همه کاربران به متن مطالب تهیه نمایند!
توجه!
  • حق عضویت دریافتی صرف حمایت از نشریات عضو و نگهداری، تکمیل و توسعه مگیران می‌شود.
  • پرداخت حق اشتراک و دانلود مقالات اجازه بازنشر آن در سایر رسانه‌های چاپی و دیجیتال را به کاربر نمی‌دهد.
دسترسی سراسری کاربران دانشگاه پیام نور!
اعضای هیئت علمی و دانشجویان دانشگاه پیام نور در سراسر کشور، در صورت ثبت نام با ایمیل دانشگاهی، تا پایان فروردین ماه 1403 به مقالات سایت دسترسی خواهند داشت!
In order to view content subscription is required

Personal subscription
Subscribe magiran.com for 70 € euros via PayPal and download 70 articles during a year.
Organization subscription
Please contact us to subscribe your university or library for unlimited access!