فهرست مطالب سمیه فرجی

To investigate the genetic diversity of differential cultivars wheat rusts (yellow (Puccinia striiformis), stem (P. graminis) and leaf (P. recondite) rust) for phenological, morphological and agronomical traits 58 differential cultivars along with 5 control genotypes (Karem, Yavaros, Rejab, Saji and Zardak), an experiment base on  augmented  design at the the research field of Ilam University during 2017 was carried out. The studied traits were phenological traits (from days to emergence, days to shooting, days to booting, days to heading, days to flowering, days to physiological maturity) and morphological traits (plant height, peduncle length, node number per shoot, tiller fertill nounmber per plant, tiller number per plant, awn length, spike length, spikelet no. per spike, 100 seed number, biological yield, grain yield and harvest index). The range of trait changes from 134 to 188 days was variable and respectively for differential cultivars SR17 and SR13. The range of plant height changes varied from 47.4 cm in the differential cultivar YR8 to 100.3 cm in the differential cultivar LR12. Cluster analysis by Ward method divided the differential cultivars yellow, stem and leaf rusts were studied in three, three and five groups, respectively. LR1, LR9, LR12 and LR13 were identified as the best differential leaf rust varieties in terms of yield and yield components. YR4 and YR11, which are among the yellow rust differential cultivars, had high grain yield and harvest index. SR1, SR13, SR6, SR14, SR7, SR8 and SR3 were identified as superior stem rust genotypes. Therefore, it can be concluded that these varieties are of great importance in selection and breeding programs to achieve higher yield.

The aim of this research was to make study of the components of the learning organization and its compliance whit entrepreneurial strategies of the technical and professional organizations in Uromiyeh. The Statistical populationconsisted of technical and professional staff of uromiyeh. The sample of the study included 120 technical and professional staff who were randomly selected using stratified sampling.To collect the data, the researcher used the learning organization and entrepreneurial strategies questionnaires. To check the reliability of the questionnaires, cronbach's alpha coefficient was calculated which was 0.82 and 0.90 for entrepreneurial strategies and learning organizationquestionnaires respectively. The obtained data was analyzed by conducting descriptive andinferential statistics, T test, Friedman and Structural EquationModeling analyses using SPSS and PLC software. The results revealed that the components of learning organization were above the mean at an optimal level. Moreover, the components of learning organization matched some of the strategies.

Myth, as viewed by those who believe in it, is a real story; but its reality is not historical so that it can be established by historical evidence; nor is it a reality which can be established through rational arguments. It is the story of realities caused by gods at the beginning of the world; and it is from this point that the myth obtains its reality. In addition, it differs from false stories, in which there is no god, and no mention of the momentous and big events like those of the beginning of time. The awe-inspiring nature of the true story or myth is the other side of its coin of truth. That is why the people who believe in myth don’t speak of it everywhere. However, unless the myth is examined in context, it will turn into a worldly and false story.

The controversy, which was provoked during the eighteenth century Europe with Voltaire and Hume being its leading characters, over the question whether polytheism preceded monotheism or vice versa, took on a new form due to the advancements made in the anthropological studies. In contrast with those who believed that monotheism had developed from polytheism, there were those who believed in the primordial monotheism. The author of the present article holds that both of the theories have considered the formation of monotheism with reference to the religions of the uncivilized people, whereas this method isn’t an acceptable one. In order to investigate into this problem adequately, one should consider the polytheistic religions of a variety of civilized people in the ancient periods. He is of opinion that monotheism neither was primordial nor grew out of polytheism. He believes that monotheism was the outcome of a revolt against polytheism or idolatry, and that this event has rarely happened in the history of mankind.