فهرست مطالب آزاده قاسمی برزگر

Examining many examples of criminalization in the field of preservation and protection of society's values shows the existence of criminal inflation, non-compliance with the needs of society, disproportion between crime and punishment, lack of consideration of preventive measures against the occurrence of crime and also non-compliance with policies. The entire notification system is the Supreme Leader's position. However, there is a considerable legal gap in dealing with epidemic diseases, including Corona.

His research is of a theoretical type, the research method is descriptive and analytical, and the method of collecting information is library-based, referring to documents, books, and articles.

In all stages of writing the present research, while respecting the originality of the texts, honesty and trustworthiness have been observed.

The findings of this research indicate that while using preventive measures, criminalization of violations in the field of non-compliance with the regulations related to Corona should be done based on the doctrine of mere material crimes.

Protecting the health of people in the society, especially during the outbreak of an emerging disease like Corona, is one of the important duties of the government. One of the ways to protect health and safety in the society is to use the guarantee of criminal execution in compliance with the principles and criteria required for criminalization. Failure to pay attention to the regulations related to the corona pandemic era should be criminalized as material criminal events, so that without the need for intentionality or criminal guilt, and by decisively, quickly and timely dealing with the offenders, they will cause public intimidation of the members of the society and punish them. To respect and apply health regulations.Please cite this article as:Abbasi Kalimani A, Ghasemi Barzegar A. Feasibility of Criminalizing the Violation of the Rules and Restrictions Related to the Corona Pandemic in the form of a Mere Material Crime. Medical Law Journal. 2022; 16(57): e36.

There is a lot of dispute about concession as a common way of transaction. Among them, the necessity or possibility of concession in the matter of debt, is the axe of discussion between jurists. By considering the commonness of concession and the importance of its related matters, the present article, by an analytical-descriptive method, firstly establishes a primary principle in the issue and then based on each of the two jurisprudential views around the necessity or possibility of concession, these two ideas have been examined. According to these surveys, the primary principle in the issue, based on the idea of ownership possibility, is the necessity of concession and based on the idea of possession permission, the first principle is the possibility of concession. Based on ijtihadi reasons, beside the primary principle in the issue, whether the concession has been considered as a necessity or possibility, the idea of  necessity is more acceptable. The principle of necessity, the continuity of inadmissibility of debt claiming rule (in the case of debt  feasibility), essentialness of considering the certain cases of Ijma (consensus) which have been excepted out of the necessity, could be the reasons which would prove the matter of necessity.