فهرست مطالب احمدرضا کیهانی

Prolonged sitting postures are among the risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders in occupational settings, leading to increased musculoskeletal discomfort in various body regions. This discomfort can negatively impact individuals’ health and impose high costs on society in terms of work absences, early disabilities, and reduced productivity. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of stretching exercises on the level of discomfort, muscle activity, and muscle fatigue in the neck and trunk region during prolonged sitting tasks.

This experimental study was conducted among 20 healthy male and female participants under two test conditions: control and intervention. In the control condition, participants performed cognitive tasks (watching videos, typing, text editing, and nback cognitive test) without any intervention. In the intervention condition, participants performed stretching exercises before each task. The Visual Analogue Scale was used to assess perceived discomfort. Also, muscle fatigue was evaluated using an electromyography (EMG) device and RMS and MPF measures.

Discomfort in hands and arms (p-value=0.04) and lower back (p-value=0.03) during video-watching was higher in the control condition than in the intervention. Regarding muscle activity, the activity of the right cervical erector spinae during the video-watching task was lower in the control condition than in the intervention. In the n-back cognitive test and text editing, the right lumbar erector spinae muscle activity was significantly higher in the control condition than in the stretching exercises intervention. Regarding the left cervical erector spinae, a significant difference was observed between fatigue in control and intervention conditions during the video-watching task. Also, right thoracic erector spinae fatigue in text editing was higher in the control condition than in the exercise intervention; however, for the n-back test, the level of fatigue was lower in the control condition compared to the intervention.

The perceived discomfort in seated computer tasks is generally lower in the exercise intervention compared to the control condition. The stretching exercises used in this study improved muscle activity and reduced fatigue in some of the trunk muscles, although the effects of the exercises depend on the type of task. Overall, muscle fatigue in two cognitive tasks, text editing and n-back, was more affected by stretching exercises than other tasks.

Given the high prevalence of low back pain in manual handling activities, its known relationship with spinal loads, and the role of muscular fatigue and the body’s adaptive mechanisms to counteract fatigue, this study investigated the effect of repetitive lifting tasks on trunk muscular fatigue and the kinematics of the spine and load-in-hand.

Eighteen male volunteers lifted a box from the floor to their waist height at a pace of ten lifts per minute until they could no longer continue the task and reported the highest level of exhaustion. Kinematic data and muscle electromyographic activity were simultaneously recorded using a motion capture system and an electromyography device. In this study, average trunk flexion angle and trunk angular velocity were calculated as trunk kinematic variables, while average box vertical travel distance, average box horizontal displacement from L5-S1, and average box vertical displacement velocity were considered as box kinematic variables. The median frequency of electromyographic signals from selected muscles was quantified as a muscle fatigue indicator. Since subjects performed different lifting cycles, the total number of cycles was divided into five distinct blocks for data analysis.

The results showed significant effects of lifting trial blocks on trunk angle (p=0.004) and vertical box displacement (p<0.001). Median frequency was significantly affected by lifting blocks for right (p=0.016) and left erector spinae (p=0.014), right (p=0.021) and left multifidus (p<0.001), right latissimus dorsi (p=0.001), and left rectus abdominis (p=0.039).

Overall, the results highlight variations in most kinematic parameters and a reduction in the frequency content of EMG signal spectra. These changes serve as indices of the central nervous system’s control over lifting behavior under dynamic conditions. A better understanding of these central nervous system adaptations could have practical applications in interventions such as workstation design, exoskeleton development, and worker training to manage musculoskeletal disorders.

The use of exoskeletons as a new ergonomics intervention to reduce musculoskeletal disorders risk factors and increase human performance has emerged in the fourth-generation industrial revolution. The aim of this study was to assess the cervical exoskeleton effect on the neck and shoulder muscles electrical activity.

In this experimental study, 14 male participants were asked to perform the simulated overhead work with and without using the cervical exoskeleton at two neck postural angles randomly. During the task, electromyography of the target muscles in the neck and shoulders was recorded. In addition, at the end of each task, participants completed a perceived discomfort questionnaire. Electromyographic signals were processed with Matlab 2017b software and the level of the electrical activity of the target muscles was normalized to the maximum muscle activity. Data analysis was performed using Random intercept mix model in STATA 14 software.

Mean perceived discomfort in the neck and shoulders regions significantly reduced by the exoskeleton device, but there was no statistically significant difference in other areas. Also, the mean activity level of sternocleidomastoid and splenius capitis muscles on the right and left was significantly decreased during the use of the cervical exoskeleton. However, this difference showed a significant increase in trapezius muscles.

The use of the neck exoskeleton was associated with a reduction of muscle electrical activity and the perceived discomfort in the neck area. These results may be related to transferring neck and head weight by the exoskeleton retaining jack during the neck extension to other areas of the body. The exoskeleton design did not provide support for the shoulder and arm area, which explains the reason for the non-significant results in the shoulder area. Using the exoskeleton with the additional support in shoulder area could be considered as an ergonomic intervention in such overhead works.