فهرست مطالب جعفر ساسان

The purpose of this paper is to answer the question of the differences and similarities between the French Revolution (1789) and the Islamic Revolution of Iran (1979) in terms of political implications, especially in terms of the transformation of political structure. , By combining theories associated with the aftermath of the revolution, such as the Huntington, Tilly, Zimmerman, Skachpol and others, and the extraction of indicators of the political consequences of the revolution, such as the transformation of political structure and political stability, and it was hypothesized that the political consequences of the French Revolution And the Islamic Revolution of Iran, in terms of the transformation of the political structure, such as the abolition of the royal system and the formation of a republic They are similar to the constitution and the transformation of the three powers, but they differ in terms of the nature, bahe abolition of the royal system and the formation of a republic, the adoption of the constitution and the transformation of the three powers, are different from one another in terms of the nature, foundation, time, type, and the way in which political structure and political stability change.sis, time, type, and the way in which political structure and political stability change. To examine and test the hypothesis above, political developments after the French Revolution and the Islamic Revolution of Iran

Although some studies have been conducted on Iran’s political stability after the Revolution, the present article compares political stability and instability in the four decades after the French Revolution and the Revolution of Iran in order to provide a deeper understanding of the Islamic Revolution. Therefore, the research question is: How was the status of political stability in France after the Revolution (1789 A.D./ 1167 A. SH.) in comparison with Iran after the Revolution (1357 A. SH.) in the four decades after the Revolution? The authors believe that regarding the comparison of the criteria of political stability in the two countries, Iran after the Revolution has enjoyed more political stability than France. In order to prove the hypothesis, political changes in France and Iran after the Revolution, including changes in political structure, continuity of political system and its challenges, were analyzed using comparative method and the results were that as a result of unified leadership, Islamic ideology and continuous presence of the people in the four decades after the Revolution, Iran has been more stable than France in its corresponding period.

From the very beginning, mosques have turned into an inalienable part of Muslim life and continued its function in later historical periods, something which has not been the subject of but a few individual works. Therefore, mosques need to be more investigated to grasp their all-inclusive role especially in the important events such as Islamic revolution. Thus the question is still: what functions had mosques had in the political mobilization leading to the victory of Islamic revolution? Probably long credibility of mosques and their correspondence with social culture and beliefs have turned them into revolutionary organizations such that in comparison with modern civil organizations, mosques took over such organizations. This article is aimed at first expressing unparalleled importance of mosques and then mentioning their being institutions in historical events especially in Shiite society. It is only possible through a descriptive analysis to achieve this end. Highlighting the necessity of mosque's role in the preservations of developments they have created themselves is among the findings of this paper.