به جمع مشترکان مگیران بپیوندید!

تنها با پرداخت 70 هزارتومان حق اشتراک سالانه به متن مقالات دسترسی داشته باشید و 100 مقاله را بدون هزینه دیگری دریافت کنید.

برای پرداخت حق اشتراک اگر عضو هستید وارد شوید در غیر این صورت حساب کاربری جدید ایجاد کنید

عضویت

فهرست مطالب جمیله فخاریان

  • جمیله فخاریان، ابوالقاسم یعقوبی*، مجید ضرغام حاجبی، حسین محققی

    مقدمه :

    توجه به مولفه های روان شناختی، هیجانی و تحصیلی دانش آموزان روزبه روز گسترده تر می شود. بر این اساس هدف این پژوهش، پیش بینی سرزندگی تحصیلی دانش آموزان بر اساس جو عاطفی خانواده، درگیری تحصیلی و خودکارآمدی تحصیلی بود. 

    روش کار:

     روش پژوهش حاضر، توصیفی از نوع همبستگی بود. جامعه آماری شامل کلیه دانش آموزان دختر متوسطه شهر ساوه در سال تحصیلی 99-1398 بود که نمونه ای به حجم 347 نفر با روش نمونه گیری تصادفی خوشه ای انتخاب شدند. ابزارهای مورد استفاده شامل پرسشنامه های درگیری تحصیلی (ریو و تسینگ، 2011)؛ جو عاطفی خانواده (هیل برن، 1964)؛ خودکارآمدی تحصیلی (مورگان و جینکز، 1999) و سرزندگی تحصیلی (دهقانی زاده و حسین چاری، 1391) بود. جهت تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها، از ضریب همبستگی پیرسون و رگرسیون چندگانه با بهره گیری از نرم افزار آماری SPSS23 استفاده شد. نتایج نتایج همبستگی پیرسون نشان داد که بین جوعاطفی خانواده، درگیری و خودکارآمدی تحصیلی با سرزندگی تحصیلی رابطه مثبت و معناداری وجود دارد(01/0>p). نتایج تحلیل رگرسیون چندگانه نیز نشان داد که متغیرهای جوعاطفی خانواده، درگیری و خودکارآمدی تحصیلی قادر به پیش بینی 12 درصد از واریانس سرزندگی تحصیلی هستند. خودکارآمدی تحصیلی با ضریب بتای (15/0=β)، درگیری تحصیلی با ضریب بتای (19/0=β) و جوعاطفی خانواده با ضریب بتای (12/0=β) نقش معناداری در پیش بینی سرزندگی تحصیلی داشتند.

     نتیجه گیری:

     نتایج پژوهش از توان درگیری تحصیلی، خودکارآمدی تحصیلی و جوعاطفی خانواده در پیش بینی سرزندگی تحصیلی دانش آموزان حمایت می کند.

    کلید واژگان: جو عاطفی خانواده, درگیری تحصیلی, خودکارآمدی تحصیلی, سرزندگی تحصیلی}
    Jamileh Fakharian, Abolghasem Yaghoobi *, Majiod Zargham Hajebi, Hosein Mohagheghi
    Introduction

    Attention to the psychological, emotional and educational components of students is becoming more and more common. according to this the purpose of this study was to predicting academic buoyancy based on family emotional climate, academic engagement, and academic self-efficacy.

    Materials and Methods

    The research method was descriptive correlational. The statistical population consisted of all high school female students in Saveh city in the academic year of 2018-2019 that 347 students were selected through cluster sampling. The tools used included the Rio and Tsing' academic engagement (2011), Morgan & Jinks academic self-efficacy (1999), Hillburn's family emotional climate (1964), Dehghanizadeh and Husseinchari academic buoyancy questionnaires (2012). Pearson correlation coefficient and multiple regression were used for data analysis Using SPSS 23 software.

    Results

    Pearson correlation results showed that there is a positive and significant relationship between family emotional climate, academic engagement, and academic self-efficacy with academic buoyancy (p <0.01). The results of multiple regression analysis also showed that family emotional climate, academic engagement and academic self-efficacy were able to predict 12% of the variance of academic buoyancy. Academic self-efficacy with beta coefficient (β = 0.15), academic engagement with beta coefficient (β = 0.19) and family emotional climate with beta coefficient (β = 0.12) had significant role in predicting of academic buoyancy.

    Conclusion

    The results support the ability of academic involvement, academic self-efficacy and family emotional climate in predicting students' academic buoyancy.

    Keywords: family emotional climate, academic engagement, Academic self-efficacy, academic buoyancy}
  • جمیله فخاریان، ابوالقاسم یعقوبی*، مجید ضرغام حاجبی، حسین محققی
    هدف

    هدف این پژوهش، تدوین مدل سرزندگی تحصیلی دانش آموزان بر اساس جو عاطفی خانواده، محیط یادگیری سازنده گرای اجتماعی و درگیری تحصیلی  با میانجی گری خودکارآمدی تحصیلی بود.

    روش

    روش پژوهش، همبستگی از نوع مدل سازی معادلات ساختاری بود. جامعه آماری شامل کلیه دانش آموزان دختر متوسطه شهر ساوه در سال تحصیلی 99-1398 بود که نمونه ای به حجم 347 نفر با روش نمونه گیری تصادفی خوشه ای انتخاب شدند. ابزارهای مورداستفاده شامل پرسشنامه های محیط یادگیری سازنده گرایی اجتماعی Haghayeghi & Karshki (2015)؛ درگیری تحصیلی Reeve & Tseng (2011)؛ جو عاطفی خانواده (1964) Hill Bern؛ خودکارآمدی تحصیلی (Morgan & Jinks (1999 و سرزندگی تحصیلی Dehghanizadeh & Chari (2013) بود. جهت تجزیه وتحلیل داده ها، از ضریب همبستگی پیرسون و معادلات ساختاری استفاده شد. 

    یافته‎ها

    نتایج معادلات ساختاری نشان داد که ادراک از محیط یادگیری سازنده گرایی اجتماعی و جو عاطفی خانواده اثر مستقیم بر خودکارآمدی تحصیلی ندارند اما درگیری تحصیلی بر خودکارآمدی تحصیلی  اثر مستقیم  دارد. درگیری تحصیلی و جوعاطفی خانواده اثر مستقیم بر سرزندگی تحصیلی ندارند در حالی که ادراک از محیط یادگیری سازنده گرایی اجتماعی بر سرزندگی تحصیلی اثر مستقیم دارد. خودکارآمدی تحصیلی بر سرزندگی تحصیلی اثر مستقیم و معنادار دارد. نتایج روابط غیرمستقیم نشان داد که فقط درگیری تحصیلی با میانجی گری خودکارآمدی بر سرزندگی تحصیلی اثر دارد.

    کلید واژگان: محیط یادگیری سازنده گرای اجتماعی, جوعاطفی خانواده, درگیری تحصیلی, خودکارآمدی تحصیلی, سرزندگی تحصیلی}
    Jamileh Fakharian, Abolghasem Yaghobi *, Majid Zargham
    Introduction & Objective

    It has been nearly a century that psychologists have been extensively working to identify predictors of well-being and academic achievement. The success of students at school is the primary goal of any educational system. Success at school involves gaining appropriate experiences in all psychological, emotional, social, behavioral and biological dimensions. Gaining these experiences at school can have a decisive impact on the present and future lives of children and adolescents. Academic buoyancy is one of the normal concepts and constructs of positive attitudinal psychology study that is associated with improved academic achievement because vitality is one of the influential factors in education that students have identified as a strategy for dealing with problems and challenges. They use education. Schools and other learning environments are places where academic challenges, barriers and pressures are a lasting reality of academic life, which can make students tired and frustrated at school. The antecedents of academic buoyancy have been considered at three different psychological levels, factors related to the academic environment and participation in the educational process, and factors related to family and peers. At the family and peer level, family support, communication with others, informal networks of friends, peer education, supportive and empowered parents, and membership in grassroots associations have been referred to. Family-level and peer-to-peer levels were considered in the process of coping with stressors and the process of stress. According to Newgarten's Theory of Activity (1964), establishing and maintaining active family relationships and social support and participation in social interactions helps to keep the individual dynamic and is a potential force for mental health support and enriches the sense of subjective well-being. By the emotional climate of the family, we mean how family members interact and behave. Family members' perceptions of each other, their feelings and interest in each other, and how they are involved or not involved in each other's work and their cooperation or competition with each other, illustrate how they relate. At the school level and participation, more attention has been paid to learners' perceptions of the learning environment the term atmosphere is known as a system of situational dimensions that affects the participants. Situational dimensions can include social, physical, emotional, and intellectual factors. The learning environment, based on the principles of constructivism, is a good learning environment for the classroom and results in better academic achievement and increases the overall effectiveness of education. This view holds that the process of knowledge-building requires active learning by the learner. Social constructivist environments seek to lead the individual toward responsibility, goal-setting, and goal-directed teaching and facilitators. Thus, it can be concluded that teachers should be able by developing a favorable learning environment and subsequently, making learners 'perceptions of the learning environment positive, enhancing their learning outcomes, one of which can be learners' motivation. In addition to family and educational factors, psychological antecedents affecting academic buoyancy, the concept of academic engagement and self-efficacy beliefs are among the positive factors in students' vitality and academic success in educational settings, especially in schools. Academic involvement is considered as the basis for reformist efforts in the field of education, reflecting the active involvement of the individual in a task or activity, and emphasizes the role of self-awareness in the study, design of meta-cognitive beliefs and self-regulation. Lack of self-efficacy is also the source of many problems with academic failure and psychological problems. Therefore, identifying antecedents and factors affecting students' ability to cope with academic challenges and obstacles that lead to academic buoyancy is therefore important. The purpose of this study was to develop a model of academic buoyancy of female high school students in Saveh based on family emotional climate, constructivist social learning environment and academic engagement mediated by academic self-efficacy.  

    Method

    The research method was correlation and structural equation model. The statistical population consisted of all high school female students in Saveh city in the academic year of 2018-2019 that 347 students were selected through cluster sampling. The tools used included the Haghayeghi and Kareshki social constructive learning (2015), Rio and Tsing' academic engagement (2011),  Morgan & Jinks academic self-efficacy (1999), Hill Bern family emotional climate (1964),  Dehghanizadeh and Husseinchari academic buoyancy questionnaires (2012). Pearson correlation coefficient, structural equations and goodness of fit indices were used for data analysis, and Bootstrap method was used to investigate the indirect relationships of the paths. All analyzes were performed using Statistical Package Software for Social Sciences (SPSS 19) and Software (Lisrel 8.5) Software.

    Results

     The findings of this study showed that the hypothesized model of academic buoyancy based on family emotional climate, social constructivist learning environment and academic engagement mediated academic self-efficacy in high school students in Saveh, had appropriate goodness of fit with data. Structural equation results showed that perceptions of social constructivist learning and family emotional climate did not have a direct effect on academic self-efficacy (p <0.05) but academic involvement had a direct effect on academic self-efficacy (0.74). Academic engagement and family emotional climate have no direct effect on academic buoyancy (p <0.05) but perceptions of social constructivist learning have a direct effect on academic buoyancy (p <0.01). Academic self-efficacy has a direct and significant effect on academic buoyancy (p <0.01). The results of indirect relationships showed that only academic engagement affects academic buoyancy mediated by self-efficacy.

    Conclusion

    The results support the direct effect of academic engagement on academic self-efficacy and mediate the role of self-efficacy in the relationship between academic engagement and students' academic buoyancy and indicate the importance of mediating variables. The cognitive process of self-efficacy affects many behaviors including task selection, effort, endurance, and progress, and the importance of this mediating variable was also confirmed in the present study.

    Keywords: social constructivist learning environment, family emotional climate, academic engagement, Academic self-efficacy, academic vitality}
بدانید!
  • در این صفحه نام مورد نظر در اسامی نویسندگان مقالات جستجو می‌شود. ممکن است نتایج شامل مطالب نویسندگان هم نام و حتی در رشته‌های مختلف باشد.
  • همه مقالات ترجمه فارسی یا انگلیسی ندارند پس ممکن است مقالاتی باشند که نام نویسنده مورد نظر شما به صورت معادل فارسی یا انگلیسی آن درج شده باشد. در صفحه جستجوی پیشرفته می‌توانید همزمان نام فارسی و انگلیسی نویسنده را درج نمایید.
  • در صورتی که می‌خواهید جستجو را با شرایط متفاوت تکرار کنید به صفحه جستجوی پیشرفته مطالب نشریات مراجعه کنید.
درخواست پشتیبانی - گزارش اشکال