فهرست مطالب جواد توسلی نوقابی

This research is done to present the academic entrepreneurship evaluation model . The Descriptive research method is operational and through medley manner. Data of qualitative part were collected according to the documentary approach and a semi-structured interview with 20 professionals. These people have been chosen through purposive sampling style to theoretically saturate the information. The details were analyzed, coded in MAXQDA and based on the preliminary indicates which were identified, the form with 5 dimensions,32 components and 66 indicators was designed. In the quantitative part, a total of 148 people were sampled by simple random sampling among faculty members in the Azad University. The data of this part were validated by the method of structural equations based on partial least squares using the smart-PLS. According to the figures, evaluation of university entrepreneurship (with structural validity of 0.90) includes five components of evaluation of academic entrepreneurship stimuli (12 indicators,0.68), enables (10 indicators,0.83), third flow activities (28 indicates,0.93), effects internal (6 indicators,0.81) and external influences (10 indictors,0.88) that each of the components explains with 22,21,26,24 and 23% changes in the structure of academic entrepreneurship evaluation, respectively. The value of the SRMR fit index of the saturation model is 0.085. This model with presenting the view of actors and university entrepreneurship components and their key indicators creates an optimal understanding of measuring the academic entrepreneurship and its components which can be the basis of comparison of universities and can also be as a criterion for decision-making and selection of strategic of future universities.

America and its allies took steps to form a coalition and attacked the extremist positions after a long time of the violent extremist activities in South-West Asia, with specific goals as the fight against terrorism. However, the objectives of the action announced by them, but according to the previous records of America, these goals seem unrealistic and need to understand the real goals of the coalition and with the advice of the past through future study. Therefore, it is trying to determine to a large extent behind the main objectives in this study, with reference to the population of which consists of two categories: "Documentation, media interviews," and "experts". The data were extracted and analyzed using content analysis and exploration as the first population. After the data were categorized in several sections, and then send the questionnaire to the population to judge. Finally, it was recognized with a number of 13 important objective judgment of experts, using network analysis techniques and the use of software Super Decision analysis process. So the most important of them are "to weaken the powers of the Middle East"; "Israel's security" and "Re-penetration of America and its allies in the Middle East".