حسن منطق

The current research seeks to identify and analyze the most important trust-building factors affecting the sharing of organizational knowledge in the field of knowledge management to provide the basis for proper management and proper planning for managers of organizations.

The present research was conducted using the methods of Systematic Review and Delphi. The participating experts in Delphi were selected by purposive sampling. The selected experts were professors of information and knowledge science, sociology, and management in university with scientific and research experience in knowledge management and organizational trust. In order to analyze the data, frequency distribution, mean, agreement coefficient, one-sample t-test, and Friedman ranking were used.

The research findings showed that the trust-building factors affecting knowledge sharing could be categorized into six general dimensions, including organizational trust factor, mental norm, and attitude towards knowledge sharing, external motivation, internal motivation, and organizational support. Among the effective factors from the point of view of experts, the factor of organizational trust, with a total Mean of 4.86, has the most impact, and external motivation, with a total Mean of 4.14, has the least impact on knowledge sharing. The effects of the factors on the components of knowledge sharing also showed that the effect of organizational trust on the intention to share knowledge, with an average of 4.91 and a consensus index of 1.9, has the highest average and value of the consensus index, Vice versa, the effect of the external motivation factor on the component Knowledge sharing behavior has the lowest value with an average of 4.09 and a consensus index equal to 1.38. Also, the factor prioritization index results showed that the organizational trust factor has the first rank with a Mean rating of 4.45. After that, the factor of internal motivation and attitude to knowledge sharing with a similar Mean rank equal to 3.77 in the second rank, the factor of organizational support with a Mean rank equal to 3.50 in the third rank, the Mental norm factor with a Mean rank equal to It ranks fourth with 23.3 and external motivation factor ranks fifth with a Mean rating of 2.27.

The results showed that for efficient knowledge sharing and creating a dynamic platform, the attention and appropriate policy of managers and knowledge management professionals to improve the culture of knowledge sharing among different organization departments seems necessary. In this regard, organizations are suggested to facilitate employee knowledge-sharing by strengthening trust-building factors and motivational stimuli.

Knowledge sharing is one of the key processes of knowledge management, and its effective implementation plays a significant role in achieving the goals of knowledge management. Many factors affect the knowledge sharing of employees, one of the most important is the trust factor. Trust is one of the important and effective components in any model of organizational knowledge sharing. Based on this, in the present research, an attempt has been made to investigate the relationship between knowledge sharing and organizational trust with a comprehensive approach and using the meta-analysis method.

The current research is practical in terms of purpose, which has used the meta-analysis method to determine, collect, combine and summarize the study findings on the subject of the relationship between the variables of knowledge sharing and organizational trust. In this research, first by using the keywords of trust (organizational trust, institutional trust) and those of knowledge sharing (knowledge sharing, knowledge transfer) in databases such as the Iranian Research Institute for Information Science and Technology (IranDoc), Tehran University Central Library, MagIran, Jihad Site (SID), and foreign databases such as Emerald, ProQuest, Elsevier and Springer were searched and all articles and theses that investigated the relationship between trust and knowledge sharing were collected. The number of samples reached 72 studies after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria and using the purposeful sampling method. The scale of effect size was correlation coefficients and statistical analysis was done with comprehensive meta-analysis software (CMA2).

The meta-analysis results showed that the effect size in the random effects model for the institutional trust component is equal to .468, for the individual (cognitive- affective) trust component is equal to .428, and for the organizational trust structure is equal to .446, which according to Cohen's criterion (1988) all three obtained combined effect sizes are medium to high effect sizes. Also, examining the role of moderating variables showed that the variable of the "research location" (English and Persian) is one of the factors of the heterogeneity of the effect size. The effect size in the Persian research was equal to .482, which is more than the effect size in English research, which was equal to .401. The Q statistic (between groups) for the variable of "research location" was also obtained at a favorable significance level, which indicated its moderating role on the observed effect size. Also, regarding the role of the "publication type" variable, the significance level for the Q statistic (between groups) was higher than the desired level (p>.05). Therefore, it was concluded that the" type of publication" as a moderating variable has no effect on the observed effect. In other words, although the effect size of .448 obtained in the reviewed articles is more than the effect size of theses, it is not statistically significant and acceptable.

The results of this research showed that the relationship between organizational trust and its components (individual, institutional trust) and knowledge sharing is effective and in terms of the size of their effect, it is medium (upwards). In explaining the results, it can be said that organizational trust plays an important role in knowledge sharing, and a high level of trust in relationships among organizational members makes them more willing to share knowledge with each other and the majority of studies reviewed in this research have reported the trust as an important factor affecting knowledge sharing. Therefore, paying attention to organizational trust and its influencing dimensions on the intention and behavior of knowledge sharing can greatly help to improve the performance of the organization's knowledge management system. Based on this, it is necessary for managers of organizations to improve the knowledge sharing behavior of employees by creating a favorable organizational atmosphere. In this regard, by adopting encouraging and supportive policies, justice and fair treatment, promoting group learning, and forming informal and friendly groups, the institutional and individual trust of employees can be improved.

To carry out knowledge management projects, organizations need to develop a knowledge management strategy. Considering the important role of the Apiculture Industry Development and Advocacy Fund (AIDAF), this article seeks to develop a knowledge management strategy for this organization.

The present paper is an applied study that was conducted using a mixed method (qualitative and quantitative), questionnaire, and interview within the conceptual model of the research. The statistical population of the study is comprised of two groups. The first group consisted of 16 employees of AIDAF and the second group consisted of eight managers and experts interviewed using the Delphi technique.

AIDAF was assessed using the Asian Productivity Organization Framework categories (Leadership, processes, people, technology, knowledge processes, learning, innovation, and knowledge management outcomes). According to the results of the questionnaires, the score obtained for AIDAF was 113.6 indicating that AIDAF readiness for knowledge management is at the initiation level.

Conclusion:

 Based on K-SWOT analysis, AIDAF is relatively strong in terms of internal factors (weakness and strength) while, it is in a moderate and almost fragile position in terms of external factors (opportunities and threats). Therefore, AIDAF managers need to take the necessary actions to improve knowledge management.

The present study is the first study to investigate the relationship between employees' digital literacy skills and their empowerment.

This research has been conducted quantitatively using a survey method. The statistical population of the study was 440 employees with bachelor's degree and above Allameh Tabatabai University (Tehran), which was calculated and determined by Cochran's formula of 206 statistical sample size. In this study, questionnaires were distributed among the respondents using a simple random method. SPSS software and Spearman statistical tests were also used to analyze the data.

The results of data analysis showed that the average of employees' empowerment (Mean = 86.3) was at a high level and in contrast, the average level of their digital literacy skills (Mean = 53.3) was at a moderate level. Also, there was a significant relationship between digital literacy skills and employee empowerment and the correlation coefficient was equal to (r = .278).The results of examining other correlational relations also showed that except for the sense of significance component, there was a significant relationship between other components of employee empowerment and digital literacy skills. Feeling of competence (r = .187) had the least correlation with employees' digital literacy skills.

The present study deals with the role of organizational trust in the knowledge management system and examines the challenges of trust building and its use in knowledge sharing in the executive apparatus. This article is applied in terms of nature and audience, and is exploratory in terms of purpose and in terms of review and library method. The results of this study showed that the existence of trust has good results on the success of knowledge-based processes in organizations. Trust in various forms (such as: trust in the organization, trust in the system, and trust between employees) facilitates the knowledge sharing process. In different departments and organizations, if the people of the organization trust each other and the organization, the process of knowledge sharing, organization and application of knowledge is well done and provides the basis for successful implementation of knowledge management. Supporting the reciprocal transaction agreement, adopting clear policies regarding the use of intellectual property, using self-publishing to promote ownership, creating overlap in the atmosphere of employee trust are among the important measures that can improve the success of the knowledge management system in offices and organizations of executive apparatus.

This study aims to evaluate the Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) of Iranian Medical and Non-Medical librarians towards COVID. This survey can collect information about what is recognized, believed, and done by a particular population.

The present study is a survey method that was conducted using the online questionnaire from October 1, 2020, to November 1, 2020. The statistical population of the study was the communities of non-medical Librarians of Iran with 523 people and medical Librarians with 250 people. Due to social distance measures (physical distance) and restrictions, data were collected by sending an online questionnaire on social networks. The questionnaire used in this research was the standard questionnaire of knowledge, attitudes and practice included demographic questions, knowledge, practice, and practice. Cronbach's alpha test was used to determine the reliability of the measuring instrument and structural validity was used to evaluate the validity of the measuring instrument. The validity (KMO>0/7) and reliability (Cronbach's alpha>0/7) of the questionnaire were confirmed.

the mean COVID-19 knowledge scores of non-medical Librarians and medical librarians are 13.28 and 15.4 respectively. This result shows medical librarians have good knowledge towards COVID-19. The mean COVID-19 attitude scores of non-medical Librarians and medical librarians are 10.52 and 11.72, which indicates that 97.6% of medical librarians have a proper attitude of COVID-19. The mean COVID-19 Practice scores of non-Medical Librarians and medical librarians are 19.33 and 21.66. It shows that 68.5% of medical librarians have a positive practice in preventing COVID-19 and taking preventive measures.

there is a significant relationship between the educational group of respondents and their KAP towards COVID-19. Non-Medical Librarians should raise their level of knowledge and awareness as information consultants in the community. The high score of knowledge in medical librarians compared to non-medical librarians means that they are completely aware of Covid 19 disease and are fully aware of its clinical symptoms such as dry cough, fever, fatigue, and muscle aches. This group of librarians knows who the high-risk individuals are for the Covid 19, how the virus can be transmitted more, and there is no effective cure for the disease right now. They have more information about pseudo-scientific information and do not resort to it to manage the disease. The views and attitudes of both groups on the subject of Covid 19 are not the same, and medical librarians have a more realistic and positive attitude than non-medical librarians. The group of medical librarians has a better Practice compared to the group of non-medical librarians in terms of preventive action and observing the issues raised.

Today, organizations have realized that no amount of knowledge capital can put them in a desirable competitive world. Therefore, more than any other factor, the employees of the organization are considered as the owners of knowledge and the most important assets of the organization, and knowledge management as a tool that can gather and organize existing knowledge and dynamics and spread it throughout the organization is important. But what is important is the impact on other dimensions of knowledge management. One of the dimensions mentioned in the cybernetic texts. In this article, in addition to introducing and defining cybernetics and its features and its application in organizations, we seek to use cybernetics in knowledge management. This article, after reviewing the concepts of knowledge management, cybernetics and each of its dimensions, addresses the applications of cybernetics in knowledge management of organizations.

in the current research, the quality of services provided by Central Library and Documents Center of University of Tehran, and its Role of student's Generalized trust toward librarian has been studied. Through Survey Method and Questionnaire technique, a sample of 308 students selected by relatively classified sampling method findings of this research show that independent variables including (Effect of service (Librarians), Information control, Space and Place, and order and Harmony) have significant relation with dimensions of dependent variable (Generalized trust toward librarian). Among all, variable of Effect of service (Librarians) have the strongest relation with dependent variable. Results of regression analysis depicts that independent variables - entered in regression equation- predicts %45 of dependent variable variance.Originality/ value: This Research has been carried out for First Time in the area of social science and Academic libraries in particular to investigate the Relationship between the Quality of library services and generalized trust toward librarian is discussed.

Libraries and information centers of universities have an essential role in meeting informational needs of students. Therefore، their services’ quality is also effective in students’ trust. In the current research، the quality of services provided by central library of University of Tehran and its impact on students’ trust toward this library (i. e. institutional trust) has been studied. the method used for this research was a survey، using a structured questionnaire distributed among students of Tehran University. The sample consisted of 437 students who were selected using relative stratified sampling method. The findings of this research show that independent variables (including quality of services، satisfaction، evaluation of Services effectiveness، and expectations of service) have a significant relationship with the dependent variable (i. e. institutional trust)، while two variables of satisfaction and quality of services have the strongest relationship with dependent variable. The results of regression analysis depicts that independent variables entered in regression equation predicts %54 of dependent variable (i. e. institutional trust) variance. Originality/ value: This research is the first research conducted on the role of quality of services provided by academic libraries in students'' institutional trust. Evaluation of students’ trust toward libraries and the effective factors such as quality of service plays a very important role in the improving libraries activities.