فهرست مطالب حسین خالق پرست

The TV series 'Squid Game' takes an east to west perspective in an effort to clarify certain concepts that lawyers encounter, particularly criticism of the capitalist system. This type of criticism is not a new phenomenon, as many critical written works and plays have emerged in response to the global establishment of this system. However, two specific aspects within the realm of public law make this subject more intriguing. Firstly, fundamental criticism has emerged within the framework of the same capitalist system and is being presented on a global scale. This practice is uncommon among the ideologies of the 21st century, highlighting the importance of tolerance and engagement with critics and opponents. Secondly, the social contract, considered a sacred concept that forms the foundation of the modern political and legal system, has been challenged. Specifically, within the various stages of the 'Squid Game', it becomes clear that a social contract, even when formally agreed upon with consent and free will, does not necessarily guarantee any ethical or socially just content. Citizens must consciously consider the conceptual choices that encompass human rights and public liberties when accepting the social contract. It is evident that this approach will face existential and practical challenges in the future. However, the significance of defining the content to advance social justice by citizens during the acceptance of the social contract remains undiminished.

Since past time, societies have been encountered with such damages as diseases, poverty and death. Hence, it is for centuries that many states have attempted to reduce such damages via policymaking in order to realize citizens’ welfare rights. Social consequences of such initiatives are manifested in promoting citizens’ life quality level. Therefore, in the modern era, the social policies of the governments have been followed with different approaches from the past and have been influenced by the surrounding conditions of the societies.

Research methodology in present paper is based on cause-and-effect analysis of data and data collection technique is based on library and documents studying in order to respond raised hypothesis in the paper.

Ethical Considerations:

 In order to organize this research, while observing the authenticity of the texts, honesty and fidelity have been observed.

Present paper findings suggest that today states have looked at human’s welfare rights through a new approach and have attempted to cover damages from people’s incapability such as unemployment, disability and senescence through wisdom of the crowd and utilizing social initiatives and policymaking in macro levels since such damages would yield to reduction in incomes and consequently, mitigation in welfare level and losing human dignity.

The focal point of efforts can be seen in theories resulted from establishing welfare state that could improve citizens’ welfare and life qualities through supportive policies and extending human security indicators in food supply, healthcare services and training and have enhanced life expectancy via a human development approach. Despite of this, states impacted by globalization, have pursued a postwelfare approach on social policymaking based on a minimum attitude toward supporting citizens’ welfare rights.

Nowadays, social security system is seen as one of the most important mechanisms of social justice, which is shared by all theories of the state, from the liberal state to the welfare state, and even post-welfare states with some differences in the level of importance.
In Iran, states made special attempts to create a social security system by the beginning of modernity. The social security system, in accordance with ILO treaty 102 (1952), constitutes a commitment to society for social and economic harm to provide citizens with advantages and benefits because of income termination or serious reduction caused by illness, pregnancy, job accidents, unemployment, disability, old age, death as well as increase in the cost of treatment and maintenance.The present study by two measures: first, principles dominating desirable social security and its standards; and second, common patterns in executing this system, has a descriptive- analytical approach.
Literature review: In contrary to common belief, legal structure of Iran’s Social Security System has no shortcoming in terms of the imperative principles for a desirable and effective system and the relevant principles, including universality, equality, government support, minimizing the support, comprehensiveness, prevention and empowerment have a strong foothold in Iranian subjective rules.
Moreover,, the status quo can be considered in terms of the selected pattern. Meanwhile, the path of transformation from traditional patterns including saving and intervention and third party guarantee to an incremental path of advanced patterns such as occupation – based and social security general system with general law approaches should be considered. Therefore, the social security system of Iran is not in a disadvantaged state in terms of selecting an appropriate model and in terms of the historical evolution of patterns in the transition from traditional to modern and it is not far from standard systems. The present study can be summarized as follows: the legal system of social security of Iran, as a system that requires, on the one hand, to be in line with the individual’s independence from the state's support , and, on the other hand, to cover and generalize the minimum rights of citizens in the field of desirable social security due to the adoption of universal principles and the selection of appropriate models, is facing many problems in policy-making, regulation and implementation.