فهرست مطالب رازمیک درمگردیچیان

Social justice is still a perfectionist belief at the national and international levels. Justice, its definition and characteristics, as the most fundamental concern of humanity from the beginning of creation until today, have included fundamental changes and transformations, so much so that it can be said that injustice and non-realization of rights are the result of these changes and problems It is. In the Christian tradition, the standard of justice has been the teachings of this religion and man is obliged to observe justice according to the divine duty. But in the period of enlightenment and the rule of reason and experience, as well as the promotion of positivist thinking, the interpretation of justice has changed and justice changes the nature of the relationship between two people and the divine commitment and the relationship between man and God in the matter of justice fades and this change Attitude determines the deplorable consequences for human beings in the future, which in this article we try to study this issue using analytical and descriptive methods. The results indicate that justice in the Age of Enlightenment is defined in the form of a social contract by distancing oneself from the divine concept and the Christian tradition, and the realization of justice is interpreted subject to the formulation of laws in the opinion of the majority of society and guaranteeing the interests of the majority.

War has always existed as a phenomenon in social life and has always been condemned, and the condemnation of war has been part of the political and moral literature of almost all philosophical and political schools, but war in spite of all its disgraceful dimensions under certain circumstances and under certain factors. Not that it is not bad, but it becomes very necessary, by reviewing the history of different societies, it clearly saw the golden leaves of its courage and resistance, which are always considered as a shining part of the political and historical life of the people. The honor and repulsion of the enemy's aggression has always been honored with the approval of reason, wisdom and knowledge, to the extent that in Islam war is considered as a branch of religion, but the question arises whether war is allowed in Christianity. ? Could there be a situation where war is considered permissible? In this article, we try to answer these basic questions. The results of the article show that Augustine, with the fear of the Christian tradition and by combining the views of our thinkers before him, especially Cicero, skillfully fills the gap caused by the idea of ​​non-war and the need for justice by resorting to war in the Christian tradition. Also, in the teachings of Christianity, entering into war under any title is forbidden and Christianity forbids resorting to war in general.