فهرست مطالب ظهراب روستا

The emergence of newly created institutions leads to the formation of new rational structures, which it seems necessary to examine their validity in order to solve emerging issues. The issue is, what is the validity of this range of buildings? It is assumed that contemporary intellectual structures have intrinsic validity. Famous scholars believe in the non-intrinsic validity of rational constructions, so they face restrictions and difficulties in confronting invented constructions and discovering the consensus of the Shariah. The positive result of the upcoming research is the unpopular theory, that is, the inherent validity of rational structures, especially contemporary rational structures. By looking carefully at the Usuli works of Imam Khomeini (RA), the conclusion is reached that the view of His Holiness is different from the Usuli scholars. In this way, they adopted the theory of non-deterrence in relation to non-invented constructions while accepting the validity of credit. But regarding the contemporary rational constructions, it can be said that it believes in the inherent validity, because it is rationally (to us also rationally) acted on it, and failure to adhere to them leads to difficulties and embarrassment and disruption of the system. The rule of attachment, grace and expediency element strengthen this view. The upcoming research has addressed this issue with an analytical and descriptive method.

Economic sanctions as an economic war have challenged the Islamic system. And the economy is with infidel countries whose political policy is in opposition to the embargoes. The issue at hand is what are the jurisprudential barriers and permissions of these types of agreements and how are they analyzed in dealing with each other? The descriptive-analytical study of this issue shows that the documentation of the permission is strong in the direction of preserving the Islamic system, and it assigns the generality of the upcoming obstacles such as the rule of negation of mustache, negation of the guardianship of infidels and Alaw. Jurisprudential documents, including the rule of urgency, the element of expediency, and maintaining the system, are among the secondary titles of converting the first ruling into the second, which indicate the permissibility and general allocation of obstacles. Also, the rule of repelling corruption from the corrupt, the issue of the conflict between the harmful and the permissibility of taking help from the infidels in war, along with the rule of reason and the construction of reason, indicate the violation of covenants, and it allows the Islamic ruler in terms of government decrees or in the field of "al-Faragh region" to initiate its conclusion.

Emotional divorce, according to psychologists, is an undeclared separation that results in vanishing the sexual pleasure from each other because of the rupture of the couple’s emotional relationship. This type of divorce is not officially recognized in jurisprudence and law, but jurisprudential and legal laws may give some insights about it. From the jurisprudential point of view on adultery, a married man (moḥṣin) is the man who is married and a married woman (moḥṣina) is the woman who is married, subject to sexual pleasure between them. Article 227 of the Penal Code, by prescribing this criterion, refers to some examples of marriage rupture that are not possible in the case of their existence. The present research is intended to investigate the role of emotional divorce in the decline of the state of being married (iḥṣān). It is assumed that emotional separation is an example of the fall of the state of being married that can play a role in determining the verdict.