فهرست مطالب علی یوسفی آهنگرکلایی

Judging rightly can remove oppression and unjust judgment can create oppression. Therefore, in addition to judging, the legislator has installed another element to compensate the damage caused by unjust judgment. Investigating this is one of the goals of this research.

This research has been carried out in a library using descriptive-analytical research methods. Ethical Considerations:

related to writing texts and referring to sources was observed.

The legislature has not made the judge so responsible as to effectively lead to the closure of the judiciary or the judge to lose the courage and bravery of the judiciary, nor has it made him so immune as to be drawn into negligence and carelessness. Therefore, in some cases, the judge is responsible for compensating the damage and in some cases, the government and the treasury is responsible for compensating.

The results of the study showed that if the damage caused by the judge is due to intentional or unintentional fault and violation but contrary to legal rules, he is personally responsible of compensation for material and moral damage. If the judge is alive, he should compensate the damage with one of the objective remediation measures like financial compensation. However, after the judge's death, the damage will be compensated from his estate or inheritance. However, if the judge makes a mistake or error in issuing a verdict and issues an incorrect verdict without any malice, the damages will be paid from the treasury.