فهرست مطالب غلامعلی رودی

In current research, the role of organizational leadership and culture factors on tacit knowledge sharing among library staff in Iranian government universities has been examined.

The research is practical regarding the purpose, and scanning in terms of data collection method. The statistical population of this research includes all librarians (600 person), working in the libraries of state first level universities in Iran. The sample population of the study consists of 230 person who were selected by simple random sampling. Required data were collected by three questionnaires according to the organizational leadership, organizational culture and tacit knowledge sharing with 63 questions. Analysis of obtained results was performed using Spearman test and structural modalities applying SPSS and PLS software .

The analysis of the results have shown that these is a positive and significant relationship between organizational leadership and dimensions (group empowerment, team building, coaching, continuous self-assessment and continual performance improvement), and organizational culture with dimensions (coherence and coordination, customer orientation, Organizational learning, strategic direction and intention, and vision) with the sharing of tacit knowledge. Based on the research findings, the factors of organizational leadership and culture can affect tacit knowledge sharing. Moreover, it has an essential role on staff empowerment in conducting institutional affairs, achieving necessary skills, innovation and creativity, foresight, increasing the efficiency, constitutional unity, gaining a stable competitive advantage and belonging sense to the organization

Implicit or tacit knowledge is the knowledge that refers to the knowledge acquired after personal experiences, skills, and awareness in the minds, and its formulation is very difficult and cannot be explained or convey to others. The purpose of this research is to provide a paradigmatic model of tacit knowledge in Iranian universities from the point of view of knowledge and information science experts with a grounded theory approach.

The present research is a qualitative one with the grounded theory method. The statistical population includes knowledge and information science specialists who are expert in the field of knowledge management that were selected by the snowball (chain referencing) sampling. The method of collecting information is in-depth and open interview. 12 individuals were interviewed.

The results showed that tacit knowledge sharing can be attributed to the development of employees' capabilities and prosperity, motivation, attitude and behavior and results in motivation and acquisition of technical and specialized skills, futurology, increased productivity, gaining competitive advantage, and identifying and accurately analyzing requirements.

The most important factor in the creation of tacit knowledge sharing is university managers' knowledge on the importance of tacit knowledge in employees' work process as well as institutionalizing the knowledge sharing culture by using incentive stimuli. Given the identified components, the theoretical model was presented. In this model, all effective elements in tacit knowledge sharing were considered in universities. The presented model can be used as a comprehensive guide for all universities in the country.

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate administrators and librarians working in academic libraries about the skills, knowledge and information science specialists, duties and responsibilities in the future of information science and the future of this science.
The present study was a comparative survey and the population of all the managers and librarians working in public libraries, university centers are located in Tehran. The data is collected using a questionnaire made that items of information and knowledge derived from science texts have been made.
Findings: The findings of this study show that between administrators and librarians working in academic libraries, librarians in the future and the future of the required skills and knowledge of information science in Iran there is a significant difference but between administrators and librarians working in academic libraries of the future role and responsibilities of librarians and information there is no significant difference.
The results show that Time of change in information science need to unity in future opinions combine their constructive comments both groups, as well as the surrounding text to make this solid foundation and a bright future and powerful makes clear

Scientific productions indexed in major databases such as Scopus are important criteria for ranking the medical universities.Publication of these scientific productions leads to increase their visibility and citation. The purpose of this article is to investigate the publication and citation status of Gilan and Golestan Medical Sciences universities’ by end of August 2011 designating their Hirsh index.

This study is a descriptive one that was conducted through Science metric Attributable to both the university and all papers published in the Scopus database and were indexed under review. The findings were presented using descriptive statistics.

  Golestan University of Medical Sciences faculty members with the rank of associate professors are13 and they have the maximum number. The faculty members with rank of instructor are 9 and they have the lowest number .The Gilan University faculty members with the highest rank of professor are 5 and have the maximum number. The faculty members with rank of instructor and associate professor have the lowest number.

According to Scopus,  the articles of the faculties of Golestan University of Medical Sciences were 502 titles ; and  the articles of Gilan were 262.  The research population consists of 444 faculties of both Universities among them 103 faculties belong to Golestan university and 341 faculties belong to Gilan university. 32 faculties of Golestan university have Hirsh Index (31.6%) and 43 faculties of Gilan University have Hirsh Index (12.61%).
These 32 facuties of Golestan have 502 articles, 1080 citations and their H index is 94. But the 43 faculties of Gilan University have 262 articles, 689 citations and their HIdex is 82. So we can conclude that as well as our citation is , our H Index will go up. Golestan University faculties are less, but their H index is higher namely their scientific potential is higher.