فهرست مطالب مجتبی روحانی یزدلی

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between Human capitaland socio-economic development from the perspective of university professors anddoctoral students of Islamic Azad University, North Tehran Branch. The statisticalpopulation of the study was students on the one hand and professors specializing insocio-economic development on the other. The number of professors was 01 whowere selected using purposive sampling method with theoretical saturation. Thestatistical population of all PhD students in Sociology, Political Science andEconomics studying at the Islamic Azad University, North Tehran Branch, who werestudying in the second semester of - , was a sample of students. Thevalidity of the questionnaire was assessed by the face validity and reliability of thedata using test and retest methods and Cronbach's alpha test. In the survey of datacollection tools, a questionnaire was made by the researcher and in the qualitativestudy of the interview, it was semi-structured. The hypotheses have been formulatedusing social capital theory. The findings of the survey indicate that there is a strongsignificant relationship between the components of Human capital and socioeconomicdevelopment. The results of the qualitative study showed that the causalconditions of accountability, rule of law, general consensus, transparency, efficiencyand effectiveness, equal rights and responsibility have been identified and thecentral phenomenon of a single product economy in the field of private sectoractivity, independence of people and media, role The government, the participationof the government and the people, the political and organizational capacity of thegovernment, the government and the provision of welfare and the bedrock of thegovernment have emerged. Expertise, elitism and innovation as interveningconditions and single-product economics lead to social trust, social cohesion, socialsupport and social participation, which are the consequences of such actions andreactions: welfare, social security, social justice and public education. According tothese findings, it can be said that in good governance, prioritizing credible measuresfor political accountability, freedom of purposeful and efficient judiciary, freedom ofinformation and effective performance of government organizations are essential inthe process of comprehensive development of the country.

The statistical population was students and specialist professors in socio-economic developmet. The number of professors was 10 who were selected using purposive sampling method with theoretical saturation. The statistical population of students were all PhD students in Sociology, Political Science and Economics of Islamic Azad University, North Tehran Branch, who were studying in the second semester of 2019-2020 and the sample was 200 students. The validity of the questionnaire was assessed by the informal validity and reliability of the data measured by using test and retest method and Cronbach's alpha test. We used a questionnaire that was made by the researcher and the semi-structured interview. The hypotheses have been formulated using the theory of good governance. The findings of the survey indicate that there is a strong significant relationship between the components of good governance and socio-economic development. According to findings there is a strong significant relationship between variales of participation, rule of law, transparency, accountability, justice and fairness, accountability, efficiency and effectiveness, consensus building and good goverence. The results of the qualitative study showed that the causal conditions of accountability, public consensus, transparency, efficiency and effectiveness, equal rights and responsibility have been identified and the central phenomenon of the mono-product economy, which has emerged in the field of private sector activity, the independence of the people and the media, the role of the government, the government-people partnership, the political and organizational capacity of the government, the government and the welfare of the government.