فهرست مطالب محمد پرسا

According to principles 170 and 173 of the Constitution, the Administrative Justice Court has the authority to deal with complaints regarding decisions and final orders of the quasi-judicial commissions based on Article 10(2) of the Organizations and the Procedure of the Administrative Justice Court Act in the first instance in a procedural manner. Proceedings confined to a question of law is a type of proceedings in which the judge does not deal with the merits of the case but rather with the question of whether the decision complained of was made in accordance with the law or not; Therefore, existence of a regulation and procedure that contains the elements of a favorable system for administrative justice is necessaryTherefore, with the current situation of administrative proceedings and the lack of complete knowledge of the cases of such proceedings and their dispersion, this type of proceedings cannot be considered as one which fulfils is supervisory role with framework and rules.Interpreting the law, clarifying the concept of the scope of legal powers and analyzing the judicial precedent, the present article attempts to identify the characteristics and governing rules of this type of proceedings regarding decisions made by quasi-judicial commissions, and finally, while identifying its limits and scope, a correct model of supervision on procedural grounds is provided as the missing pillar of administrative proceedings so that justice can be secured.