فهرست مطالب منصور کامگاری

The discourse of good governance has been raised by international organizations and institutions and some Western thinkers and theorists since several decades ago. According to the initial design of this topic in the West and based on the previous ideas of thinkers such as: Seyyed Javad Tabatabai based on the decline and decay of philosophy and political thought in Iran after Ibn Sina and Seyyed Ahmad Tabatabai indicating the conflict between international documents and Islamic concepts, this theory has been published, Considering the decline and conflict of philosophy and political thought in Iran, in order to study and research in the field of good governance, Iranian and Islamic sources should be looked at with suspicion and the issue should be addressed by referring to the published western literature. In this research, with the aim of validating the mentioned theories by taking library records and using the descriptive and analytical method, referring to the opinions of the founders of philosophy and political thought in post-Islamic Iran, Farabi and the position of Supreme Leader (Madazleh) in the position of the leader of the revolution. Islamic Iran, we are looking for an answer to this question that Considering the western elements and features, has there been a discussion about good governance in the opinion of Farabi and the Supreme Leader? With the conducted studies, we came to the proposition that the two-dimensional epistemological, ontological and anthropological foundations of philosophy and political thought in Iran are not only western, including the one-dimensional theories of today, but philosophy and political thought in Iran have not gone through the decline curve and are contradictory. It doesn't have either, and it's from the western one-dimensional theories.

Talking about the hedonistic society in the eyes of political thinkers is one of the ways to understand the types of desirable political system in different societies. This issue is of particular importance in the eyes of Islamic thinkers, who have raised the issue of happiness both in the Qur'an and in the Sunnah. The current research aims to deal with the hedonistic politics and government in the thought of Farabi and Ayatollah Khamenei. The hypothesis of the present research is that the hedonistic politics and government in Farabi's thought is based on the existence of moral qualities and properties in the eyes of political leaders and members of the society, and in the eyes of Ayatollah Khamenei, it is based on the role of the government in providing the material and spiritual needs of the people. Based on the findings of the research, Farabi's approach to hedonistic politics and government is an attempt to establish a desirable and ideal political system that includes the model of the government of the Messenger of God (PBUH) along with Greek wisdom and is considered an intellectual support for the idea of ​​religious authority. to be But the model considered by Ayatollah Khamenei is in the stage of establishing a political system and a measure to build a new Islamic civilization in the present era. A government can be hedonistic that provides the material and spiritual needs of the people and is separate from the model of western secularism. Posterior and ultimate happiness in Farabi's thought and good life in the worldly and afterlife in Ayatollah Khamenei's thought are the focus of hedonistic politics. In the current research, the descriptive-analytical method and references to Farabi's texts and works and Ayatollah Khamenei's statements have been used.