دکتر علی اکبر شایسته نژاد

There have been discussions about the omnipotence of God and the world as well as the hereafter in the Quran and quotes either explicitly or implicitly. The omnipotence of God has been a recurring theme in theologians’ discussions, and there is no religious consensus on the scope of the omnipotence of God. In particular, according to the Koran, the adherents of the Jewish religion accused God of weakness and inability. On the other hand, the question "to be seen and visible" in order to show the great power of God has an important place in the Shiite’s beliefs. The current research aims to examine the theologian’ opinions and compare it with the verses and stories of Quran to prove God's omnipotence. Therefore, after defining the concept of Muslim sects and presentation of an stable definition, the research makes an attempt to remove some doubts in this regard, and determines the relationship between problem of "to be seen and visible" and divine power. The advantage of this article compared to other articles of the same theme is that the omnipotence of God was discussed independently, its relationships with "to be seen and visible" was explained, and its important place in the Shiite’s beliefs was made clear.

Gradual interpretation is one of the approaches to the Quran commentary. Up to now، Shia interpreters have not compiled a complete commentary based on this approach. Sunni interpreters (Al Qazi and Druze)، however have dealt with it. Some thinkers have considered it necessary for reconstructing the history of Islam and some have deemed it necessary for a better understanding of the Quran. Some have considered it as a unique approach and denounced the other commentaries. The writer''s aim is to show that gradual interpretation is not superior to ordinal interpretation. This paper is a fundamental type of research، and the author proves his claim through a content analysis method and descriptive and library–based approach. The paper concludes that، considering the impossibility of determining the exact order in which the verses and the chapters were revealed and not emphasizing on the certainty of this kind of interpretation and superiority، etc by religions leaders، some consider the drawbacks of Druze''s Hadith interpretation and gradual interpretation as a kind of innovation and novelty in interpretation but its advantage over ordinal interpretation is not provable.

Human role in his own actions is one of the important topics of theological and commentary discussions. Fakhr Razi believes that all of the human actions are attributed to God and he believes that assigning the creation of actions to human causes the negation or weakness of God􀀇s power and sees that the human􀀇s belief and disbelief is due to creation of God. However, he does not go into a strong and solid theory. Sometimes he considered human to be obliged, some other times he has been inclined to accept the human free will and sometimes, by proposing the acquisition theory and drawing distinction between will and creation of God, he has not accepted the responsibility of accepting determinism. Accordingly, he has recognized human as an obliged person to be in a state of option. Using the content analysis method, the author attempts to investigate Fakhr Razi􀀇s viewpoint and believes that his theory causes the weakness of human position, rejects his responsibility, negates the causality principle and also attributes evil creation to God. As for the result of the study, one could point out to the longitudinal relationship of God􀀇s creation and human creation, and belonging of God􀀇s will on the creation of human actions, and also the difference between existential will and Divinely posited will.

Same type of benefit، the originator of various interpretations. “Mohammad Ezzat darvaze” from the Sunni Scholars the variety in the interpretation of the way of preparing chapter has borrowing on interest. And of the Quran، Al-Hadith، critic of these companions، sink، dictionaries. He is relying on the order and the saq، the sink and the tradition of makkei and civil، and your poiai using thought to some votes. Drvazeh always use wisdom and efforts and، of course، look to the analysis of the verses and Hadith sect. And verbal topics and jurisprudence، with the Shiite opposition. This article is a kind of fundamental research and analysis with the use of resources of the library in the author describing the variety of interpretation resources، some of its privileges and costi is shown. and Some of the tanzili interpretation، interpretation of the failure is shown. Note the reference to the concept of the transparent words، pronoun، evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of Gospel. This is the interpretation of the privileges.

Some verses of the Quran have spoken of the worshipping of animals, plants and lifeless phenomena. In their interpretation of these verses, scholars have proposed three different views about their prostration:. 1. the figurative meaning of the word is meant i.e. accomplish his role in the order of creation..2. another figurative meaning of the word is meant i.e. it provides the grounds for guidance of mankind to the existence of the God.3. real prostration i.e. one's humility in front of his/her creator with intelligence and self acknowledgement. Defining the meaning of "sujdah" (prostration), this article has investigated the three mentioned views and has preferred the third according to the following six arguments: 1- the authority of the apparent meaning of the verses, 2- Quran's emphasis on mankind's unability in understanding their tasbih (glorification),3-the context of the verses,4- the support of other verses,5- the support of the traditions,6-the direct observation of the mystics which has proved that their prostration is real and their humility in front of the creator of the universe is accompanied by a kind of intelligence and acknowledgement which is understood by the prophets and religious leaders and those who have reached the status of being knowledgeable of the secrets. This research encourages mankind in accomplishing his duty as well as emphasizing on the role of contemplating on Quran.

It is difficult to speak and write about concepts and sciences of the Quran. It needs serious attention and a review of the different dimensions and views. Scientific-research articles should be problem-based, well-documented and soundly based and help the production of science through pondering over the different dimensions of a subtitle. The criticism and analysis of such articles have special difficulty and need the reliance on absolute and undeniable facts. The paper entitled "Final Commentary of Oaths in Quran" has some strength but needs a fundamental criticism. The present paper is a kind of basic research. After making explicit some of the defects of aforementioned article, this paper shows that the last words of Quranic verses are at the service of their valuable and lofty meanings and are irrelevant independently, and that explaining the different meanings of a single word not only does not create confusion, but also prepares the ground for the development and transcendence of the discipline of commentary.

Due to people’s profound relation with their leaders in Islamic republic of Iran, taking good example of societyleaders specially religious leaders by people, created a very suitable ground for the victory and preservation of Iranian Islamic Revolution. Continuation of this valuable role needs serious and profound protection against threats and damages. After clarifying the concept ofparadigm and the importance of paradigmic role from Quran’s and masoomin’s viewpoint, the author studies its pathology and identifies affairs like being tempted by this world, plural paradigms, penetration of opportunists, reconciliation, demagogy and lack of contemporary knowledge as factors destroying paradigms. To resolve this problem he suggests the belief in the value of being a paradigm, maintaining appropriate relation with people, belief in people’s wisdom and firm confrontation of disturbing factors.

Some Quranic verses have either directly or indirectly referred to man's acknowledging Divine Unity in "the world of pre-existence" or "Alast". Some narrations have mentioned this as well. However, there is no consensus among thinkers as to the existence of such a world; some have argued in support of this world and others have negated its existence. The author of this paper has reviewed relevant verses and narrations as well as the assenting and dissenting views of thinkers about such a world and votes in favor of the world of pre-existence and the existence of immaterial man in that world; the author also selects the theory of men's collective presence before God, Who is beyond all temporal or spatial confines, criticizes the competing justifications, and refutes man's acknowledging God's unity before his material existence. It is argued that accepting such a confession results in the acceptance of metempsychosis and renders maturation and religious obligation vain. The merit of the present paper, compared to previous writings on this subject, is that besides a new arrangement, it analyzes Quranic verses and narrations, reviews supporting and opposing views, supports the selected theory and reports it in simple language. This is a library research of a theoretical type, and relying on the views of scholars, it carries out a content analysis and explains the concept of man's existence in the world before creation.

The present study aims to develop the pathology of unity from external and internal point of views and to find accelerating solutions to promote unity.The unity of houzeh and University is considered as one of the most important ideals and aims of Islamic system and governments after revolution. The method used in present research is assort of fundamental research and content analysis using religious texts, observation and personal experience. The results of the research are as follow; one-to clarify and review some obstacles in promoting unity of university and howzeh two- giving solutions. It is necessary and practical to promote the unity of university and howzeh and remove obstacles.

Commentary of Muqatil ibn Slayman is one of the earliest concise running commentaries of the 2nd century A.H. It is a combination of literal, textual, intellectual and deductive exegesis. The literal aspect of this exegesis predominates other aspects. Scholars are divided concerning the religious school of Muqatil and he is not considered authentic in terms of his being a transmitter of hadith. However, Sunni scholars have attached big importance to his exegesis. Some Shiite scholars have also quoted from him. The outstanding features of this commentary are as follows: conciseness, avoiding quotation of different and contradictory views, avoiding mentioning the reward of recitation of Quranic Suras, and giving Quranic vocabulary careful consideration. Among the weaknesses of this commentary we may refer to the author’s doubting the infallibility of Prophets, confusion in the issue of Imamate, his claim of the physical presence of God on the day of judgment,. .. The method of this descriptive study is gathering information based on content analysis.