مقالات رزومه دکتر فاطمه محروق

One of the important indicators in identifying power dynamics in the East Asian region is the recognition of the situation of "power transition", namely, the status of Asia in becoming the center of world politics. The purpose of this article is to assess the two theoretical approaches of “balance of power” and “power transition” and clarify the explanatory ability of “transition power” theory on new dynamic power impending in East Asia. Research Results imply that in spite of explanation strength of “transition power”, in comparison to “balance of power”, traditional understanding of transition power theory is incapable of answering to today's complex international system. So, it requires revision in its concepts and components to make it consistency with today’s international system and region. According to this, the hypothesis of the paper is that with bifurcation of transition in today’s complex international system, it seems that Dual hierarchical system with US leadership in security and China in economy is shaping East Asia order. Given to this, the methodology of the article is inductive-deductive which is involve using theory and quantitative methods in assessing the application of the theory based on the World Bank, the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) and the Stockholm Institute for the Study of Peace (SIPRI) databases

By the time financial crisis experiences, Global financial policymaking has already been changing. Policymaking of International financial markets and global economy due to financial crisis 2007-2011 and wrapped versions for tackling the crisis was vain. Given to this, analysis on interference or non- interference of state as a central argument has been the focus of international political economy. This article tries to find responses to this that whether capitalism system will be able to save from collapse based on neoclassic or neo-Keynesian theories and policies? The article stands on the hypothesis that besides state and market mechanism have played out in Countries in crisis outlets, it is necessary to focus on the role of regional regimes and Approaches of emerging economic powers. The hypothesis test paper is based on analytical-logical method.

Scientific products, especially academic articles, can be regarded as one of the major indicators of the status of a field of study. This article, by focusing on articles published in Iranian peer-reviewed journals, seeks to present a critical evaluation of the field of foreign policy analysis in Iran. Since the major interest in this field is Iran's foreign policy, 135 articles with such a focus published from 2009 to 2014 were evaluated. The articles were analyzed in terms of their methodological approach, theoretical frameworks, research strategy, types of data, and topics. The findings show that although in some aspects most of the articles follow a general positivist approach, other characteristics of articles do not match this general orientation. Realism has been proved to be the main theoretical framework applied, FPA approaches have been applied in few cases, and little has been done to develop an endogenous theory to explain Iran's foreign policy.

Future studies of acting as an independent interdisciplinary field of epistemology and methodology is the support. There are still different levels and layers of social and studies in the field of social sciences is not properly understanding and research works in the field of international relations can be seen below. The aim of this study is that its findings come to find possible causes of inattention to scripting as one of the tools used in the first and futures in the study of international relations in Iran. Accordingly, the next review of the methodology and content of research papers produced in the field of futures studies relying on scripting methods in specialized journals in political science and international relations in the period 2009-2014 with the approach of the analysis to quantify - statistical evaluation is critical. The findings show that innovation and novelty of the field of study, unscientific myths and expectations of future research and application of appropriate methods, the familiar little professors, students and researchers of international relations in this field of study, time consuming and financial costs such research and the lack of accumulated knowledge of the possible factors contributing to the lack of attention to the findings future studies in general and in particular.

The issue of transformation in China's national security strategy has fueled many debates among policymakers and research communities in the past decades. Additionally, the fact that China's growth is now considered a security threat to the Country's security procedures is also the source of many debates. The main objective of this article is to evaluate changes in China's national security strategy considering the Country's four generations of rulers, in the framework of China's security traditions and “comprehensive security. The main question posed in this article considers the ways in which China's national security Strategy has been defined and/or re-defined under the four generations of China's rulers.The answer to this question is sought in an explanatory-analytical method, with due consideration of the “comprehensive security” theoretical framework of Barry Buzan and Ole Weaver of the Copenhagen School of thought (COPRI). This is done to evaluate the power of the principles of the Copenhagen School of thought to explain and predict the changes taken place in China's national security strategy. The main hypothesis studied here is that securitizing and de-securitizing from Weaver's viewpoint and the constituents of comprehensive security are not, in most cases, able to evaluate China's security transformations.