مقالات رزومه وحید وطن خواه

AbstractThe Holy Quran is the Book of Revelation and the Miracle of the Last Prophet, has always been under attack for his special plans.The quran has called on the opposition to bring something like that, if they doubt its divinity, "Farqan al-Haq" is a contemporary example of the claimant's response to this challenge Which has done in the greatest historical conflict with the Qur'an, by stealing and adapting the text, content and content of the verses, has made 77 sections to reject the teachings of the Qur'an.The present article analyzes and critiques the theoretical foundations of the project designers through an analytical-descriptive method. The authors of the study show that the creators of this book, in the light of Christian theology and compiling a series of skeptics and objections of Jews, Christians, and Orientalists, have constructed sections. And inducing the personalization of Islam, the destruction of the Prophet's personality, Contribution in the validity of the verses of the Qur'an and they have put the defense of Christianity at the heart of their controversy.

“Sheikh Ahmad bin Mohammed bin Siddīq Al-Ghomārī,” a Sunni jurist and hadith scholar who believed in purifying hadith and then entered the issue of ilal al-hadith (problems of hadith) to defend the Prophetic Sunnah. Accordingly, he wrote the book Al-Madāwī li ‘Ilal al-Hadith. He based his study on the “unruly rejection of narrations.” Knowing sources of hadith sciences, he discovered the problems and corrected them. Some of his theories such as “rejecting the justice of all Companions,” “non-interference of religion in defecting narrators,” “criticism of the theories of the great early hadith scholars,” “tendency to Sufism,” “anti-Nasibbism spirit,” and “the superiority of Ali (AS) over the Caliphs,” make him distinguished from other contemporary Sunni hadith scholars. These theories also have affected his hadith ideas. Therefore, it seems necessary to formulate his theories and study his works in Shiite scientific communities. The study of the authors of this article shows that he methodically dealt with the problems of hadith. Accurately distorting the narrations, criticizing the opinions of the narrators, and resorting to ijtihad and arguing, he discovered many sanad problems of the Prophetic hadiths and corrected them to eliminate them from weakness. Based on the descriptive-analytical method, this article aims to examine his views on sanad problems and correcting them according to the book Al-Madāwī.

In the present age, typology is one of the research tools, especially in studies related to humanities, which is considered a framework and guideline for the researcher, and according to its rules, phenomena are categorized based on a logical pattern of categorization for better understanding and cognition. One of the areas of study in the field of Quranic research in which typing matters is the doubts and denials about the Quran. Despite the effective efforts made in the field of Quranic doubt research, the presentation of a comprehensive classification of doubts has been marginalized due to the focus of most authors on responding to doubts. Given that the scientific classification of doubts is one of the tools of doubt research and is a prerequisite for a methodical response to doubts, it is necessary to address it before offering any kind of defense and denial. Examining some of the classifications presented in the works of Quranic doubt research and considering the pattern of doubts of challengers against the Quran, especially Orientalists and Christians missionaries, this descriptive-analytical study presents a scheme including six general types of doubts: source doubts, revelation doubts, the doubts related to citing the Quran, the doubts related to understanding the Quran, text doubts and the doubts related to the carriers of revelation, and offers examples for each subcategory considering the rules of classification. The theological basis in this article is defending the Quran as a revelatory and infallible book, the scientific basis is the element of similarity in doubts and the classification is based on a pyramidal pattern. The strong point of this scheme is that it collects scattered doubts by placing them in homogeneous main and sub-categories, which in itself will be a great help in repelling the illusion of the multiplicity of doubts.

ibn Siddiq al-Ghomari is one of the contemporary Sunni narrators and head of the Hadith School of Morocco Who accepts the refinement of the hadith. After researching and teaching hadith at university of al-Azhar and city Tangier, He has methodologically entered the causes of hadith based on not imitate from prominent narrators as one of the most difficult fields of hadith science. With reasoning, ijtihad and denial of imitation, he practically corrected many prophet’s hadiths but with his own special juridical and hadiths opinions he was accused by Wahhabis and Salafis. A review by the authors of the article shows that Ibn Siddiq was one of the strictest reviewers of narrators, who only paid attention to the chain of narrators, with ijtihad and using theories like insertion, meaning of words, hatred in context, obscenity in meaning, combination, trimming, abrogating and abrogated, simulation and disorder, he redefined hadiths textually. His efforts in preserving and defending of Sunnat is considerable from two aspect; one, correcting the weakened narratives by elder narrators, the other one, weakening the narratives which accepted by them. Considering Ibn Siddiq's special hadith opinions and their closeness to Shiite views, it seems necessary to study by the Shiite scientific community. To reach this aim, this research reviews his approach in discovering and correction of textual causes, based on his book ”Al-Modawi” with analytical descriptive method.