مقالات رزومه حسین عباسی

Understanding the Transcendental Philosophy and researching it as a systematic system in Islamic philosophy and explaining the type of research done in its different fields, requires attention to the foundations and the type of methodology that prevails in it so that the various contents presented in it can be well understood. In order to eliminate doubts and explain this presence, while expressing the methodology of the Transcendental Philosophy, the capacities and growth of this philosophy in the direction of Islamic philosophical research are revealed. The Transcendental Philosophy describes the coherent relationship between philosophy and religion and mysticism, whose philosophical explanation of methodology can be considered as a macro model for expanding and deepening the research of related religious knowledge. Therefore, while explaining the methodology of the Transcendental Philosophy, the nature and foundations of the special method of this philosophy, that is, the illuminating-discussion method is discussed in which intuition and reason are gathered. Also, to explain the general method of this philosophy, that is, the nature and foundations of Mulla Sadra’s use of religious texts and theoretical mysticism in the Transcendental Philosophy have been discussed.

Understanding transcendental philosophy as a systematic system of ontology and dominance over its studied fields require paying attention to the foundations and type of methodology governing it. Transcendental philosophy is an Islamic philosophy in which there are intuition, religious text and theoretical mysticism, and knowing its methodology seems more necessary. This paper aims at solving the ambiguities and answering the questions that the researcher of Islamic philosophy, especially in transcendental philosophy, faces and considers them in conflict with the philosophical identity of transcendental philosophy. The source of these ambiguities and questions are thoughts based on the intuition of the philosopher himself or the intuition of the mystics or the religious text. In this study, after analyzing and evaluating two explanations of the methodology of transcendental philosophy, i.e. the claim of ‘context of discovery and judgment’ and the claim of ‘individual method and universal method’, we presented an explanation that can make these assertions compatible and answer the researcher’s questions in transcendental philosophy and its methodology.

Principality of existence and conventionality of quiddity can be considered as the main pillars of transcendental philosophy. This term has various interpretations each of which can be regarded as related to one dimension of that meaning. Thus, in the present article, we have attempted to review one of these interpretations (that of Master Gholam-Reza Fayyazi), and offer an explanation that seems to be closer to reality. Accordingly, in this article, we have stated Master Fayyazi’s foundations and offered a summary of his opinions regarding this principle to explain eight foundations and critiques about them, while explaining some part of semantic foundations that seems to be more correct. Besides, we have also investigated and reviewed the reason he has offered for his opinion on conventionality of quiddity with his special statement. We have continued with explaining and reviewing the most essential consequence of that statement, which seems not to be right. Therefore, in this article, we have attempted, while offering critiques of that statement, to present points for researchers in the transcendental philosophy to enable them to gain more of that philosophical school and come closer to the ontological depth of transcendental philosophy.