فهرست مطالب behnoosh moody

Increasing the use of smartphones, improving the state of World Wide Web, and also the need for flexibility in the education process have made the implementation of e-learning in human society inevitable, eliminated time and space limitations, and provided equal education. However, the pace of its creation and development, especially in universities and higher education centers in developing countries such as Iran, is very slow. Therefore, the present study aims to investigate the factors affecting the creation and development of e-learning from the viewpoint of students of Zahedan University of Medical Sciences.

This is an applied and descriptive-survey study. The sample includes 313 students studying at Zahedan University of Medical Sciences during 2016-2017, who were selected by simple random sampling. Data were collected using a researcher-made questionnaire and analyzed using statistical tests and SPSS software.

The findings show that the six selected factors of this study affect the creation and development of e-learning from the viewpoint of Zahedan University of Medical Sciences students. From the highest to the lowest effect, these factors include the quality of information and content (4.25), learners’ willingness (4.11), system quality (4.10), facilitators (4.05), student-professor interaction (3.98) and professor quality (3.84).

According to the findings of the present study, it can be concluded that policy makers and university administrators, considering the importance of each factor, invest and develop e-learning to provide better services to students and faculty.

The purpose of the present study was to analyze lived experience of teachers about the strengths and weaknesses of the Shad education network During the Covid pandemic 19. The mixed method of asynchronous sequential exploration (qualitative with phenomenology type and quantitative with descriptive-survey type) was used. The statistical population comprised of all elementary school teachers (N=600) in Zahedan County, Iran. In the qualitative step, the sample subjects (n=50) were selected using purposeful sampling based on the theoretical saturation, while 250 teachers were selected using a convenience randomized sampling and Kerjcie and Morgan Table in quantitative part. The data collecting method of the qualitative step was the semi-structured interview, while the questionnaire extracted from interviews was used as a data-collecting tool in the quantitative step. The interviews were analyzed using 7-step Colaizzi's coding method. In the quantitative step, analyses were done by using descriptive statistics (percentage and frequency) through SPSS software. According to the findings of the qualitative step, five variables, including facilitating the learning process, teaching process, and appraisal process, infrastructural-technical capabilities of the application, and professional development of teachers were introduced as strengths. Three weaknesses were also introduced: structural constraints of the Shad app. Job procrastination, and threat for students. Quantitative results indicated that most participants agreed with the opinions of participants of the qualitative step.

Despite the increasing share of educated women over time, women still play a lesser role in academic and leadership status, receiving honorary awards and academic advancement. Since compiling academic articles is considered as one of the most significant factors of success in academic careers; therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate gender cooperation pattern among the authors of articles in Journals of Geography and Urban Planning, Geography and Development, and Natural Environment Hazards until 2019.

In the present applied and descriptive study, the statistical population included all indexed articles and information of authors in the Journals of Geography in Sistan and Baluchestan University. For this purpose, some factors such as the number of articles published in quarterly journals, number of authors, number of female authors as well as gender of first authors and corresponding authors were analyzed using independent t-test in SPSS and Excel.

In reviewing the articles, 37.5% of the articles were written by three authors, indicating the authorschr('39') tendency to collaborate in this field. Moreover, the main hypotheses of the study stating no difference in the gender of the first and corresponding authors were rejected. The findings indicated that women had a small share in the status of writing articles in these quarterly journals and women attended as the first and corresponding authors only in 15.5% and 14.4% of the articles.

Although womenchr('39')s participation in the articles published in the quarterly journals has increased during the recent years, their absence still remains in the main status of the articles and they have a very small share in the main status of authors of the articles (first author and corresponding author).

In recent years, journals and quarterly journals have placed a great emphasis on increasing scientific collaboration in articles. Therefore, in this paper, the analysis of social networks was used to determine the co-authorship structure between researchers and drawing keyword co-occurrence network in the Journal of Public Management Research of Sistan and Baluchestan University.

This applied study was done by using a scientometric method. The statistical population of the study was 310 articles indexed in the Journal of Public Management Research from 2015 to 2019, collected using Publish or perish software and RIS addressing. The VOSviewer was used to draw co-authorship patterns as well as Excel and SPSS were applied to answer the research hypotheses.

The analysis of the co-authorship pattern suggested that each article had 3.2 authors in this Journal. Moreover, the most prolific authors in this Journal according to the co-authorship network due to the number of articles and collaborations were: Adel Azar, Noor Mohammad Yaghoubi, Fariborz Rahimnia, and Abdolmajid Imani. An examination of the Keyword Co-Occurrence network showed that the issues such as knowledge management (15), entrepreneurship (10), organizational citizenship behavior (9) and organizational commitment (8) were the most important subjects. Besides, the evaluation of the difference between men and women showed that with a t-value of 7.379 (p = 0.000), there was a significant difference between women and men in writing articles.

The analysis of the co-occurrence density map indicated that the topics of the papers were aligned with the new topics of management. Furthermore, the results demonstrated the high level of group participation in this journal.

Science and technology parks are one of the effective structures in technology development. As a consequence، development of knowledge-based economy and professional employment has been considered by many countries. The goal of many of these new structures is to organize an active environment for creation or development of technology chains for productorientation research، developing fields as a result of group work، and supporting purposeful activities of researchers، innovators and companies working in selected fields of technology. On the other hand، each organization requires some major factors that should be necessarily provided in order to achieve its goals. In fact، for each organization، there are fields of activity which should be performed in the best way، in order to achieve its defined goals. These factors، which called critical success factors are in management literature، are inseparable components of organizational success in achieving goals. Science and technology parks، similar to other organizations or institutes، need to provide these factors in order to achieve their goals. The purpose of this research is to identify these factors for khorasan Razavi science and Technology Park، and to specify their relative priority from experts’ point of view، who are familiar with topics related to science parks. For this purpose، after interviewing with experts in this park، 48 factors were identified and categorized in 4 groups. In the next step، these factors were compared by experts. After analyzing the results، their priority in each group as well as their overall ranking was presented by using Friedman test. The factors are ordered as; supporting of knowledgebased institutions in order to produce technology، human resource factors، factors related to development of technology Infrastructures and factors related to development of tech-based centers.