فهرست مطالب ebrahim anoosheh

The Persian Gulf region is considered one of the most important regions of the world due to its geopolitical position and rich energy reserves. The developments and dynamics of this important and vital region are influenced by various factors and can be analyzed and explained from various angles. One of the most important topics in the Persian Gulf is the security category, which has been the subject of many studies. This research intends to deal with the effect of the normalization agreement on the patterns of friendship and hostility in the Persian Gulf region by using the regional security complex theory. The findings of the research show that the normalization agreement through the creation of two hostile and competing blocs, as well as a greater concentration of crisis- and tension-causing factors, can cause more instability in the security complex of the Persian Gulf and intensify the pattern of hostile relations in this region. In addition, this agreement can secure other factors such as territorial disputes or the energy category and add to the crisis-causing factors in this regional security complex. The research method in this research is descriptive and analytical and the data collection method is documentary and library.

The findings of the research shows that the United Nations, during its 75-year lifespan, has been able to play an effective role in the performance of governments around the provision of security for the people of the world, especially their Societal security, while laying the groundwork and facilitating the platform for providing services to achieve Societal security., encourage or oblige them to comply with related matters.

Aware of the importance of soft power in the era of interdependence, the Islamic Republic of Iran uses tools such as knowledge, culture and ideology to exercise power over regional countries. One of these tools is the Organization of Islamic Culture and Communication. In this article, using the library and descriptive-analysis method, we seek to answer the question: Has the cultural diplomacy of the Organization of Islamic Culture and Communication been effective and successful in the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran or not? The results show that the cultural activities of this organization have been more effective, especially in countries where the followers of the Shiite religion have a strong presence. One of the effective factors and success of cultural diplomacy of the Islamic Republic of Iran is our cultural and religious commonalities with most countries in the region. These commonalities include Islam and Shiism, historical, civilizational and cultural commonalities such as the ancient Nowruz, the celebration of Yalda night and the celebration of poets and scientists common among most countries in the region, especially Turkey and Azerbaijan and Central Asia and Afghanistan. But in European countries, this organization tries to spread Persian language and literature by creating Persian language chairs in prestigious universities and holding exhibitions, antiquities and culture of Iranian ethnic groups and holding conferences and seminars in honor of Iranian poets and thinkers to the set goals. Achieve yourself.

The culture and identity have occupied the second place in international theories and foreign policy analysis. At first, the structuralism approach as a social theory and subsequently in international relations and foreign policy, has attempted to analyze noncorporeal factors such as culture, the norms, identity, and values on foreign policy. Since culture, identity, norms, and values were an integral part of Iran's Revolution, it has also influenced Iran's foreign policy as a result of these issues. In this research, I attempted to study the elements that form the identity of Islamic republic of Iran’s system, such as being Iranian, Islamic and global, and then, we analyzed the effect of Iran’s political system in foreign policy. Thus, the author’s goal is to analyze Iran’s foreign policy by using a descriptive analytical method in terms of structuralism. The author believes that structuralism may have a better way of describing the behavior of Iran’s foreign policy and national interests.

As countries' economic growth depends on energy supply, so energy security is one of the most important challenges for the world's major economies. Energy security is a multi-dimensional concept, one of which is military security around the protection, transit and backing of the military and arms financing of those resource holders. The purpose of this research is to ask what the role of the Islamic Republic of Iran's Armed Forces can be in securing the energy flow of the West Asian region? They are in line with energy competition and threats to energy security in the West Asian region, particularly the Persian Gulf. This paper is a forward-looking scenario based on the Tada model and explores the issue of military energy security in the West Asian region in the 2025 horizon. Given the current trends and drivers, the West Asian region continues to have an anarchic structure, and the Islamic Republic of Iran's Armed Forces as a regional power is monitoring existing and future threats by consolidating its structures in order to balance and mitigate the risks of future conflicts. They must create deterrence and safeguard Iran's national interest by anticipating future developments, formulating multiple scenarios, and making maximum use of the position of the Gulf Coast's 38 islands.

This study aims to examine and analyze the current state of Iran-Israel conflict over Iran's nuclear program. In this regard, the game theory tool has been used. The present research is descriptive-analytical in terms of its purpose and in terms of the nature of the research. According to the statements of the leader of the revolution that it is impossible to retreat from the nuclear positions and to continue the path that has been made in Iran's nuclear program, one can conclude that all the states of exit and development, rather than maintaining the status quo and maintaining the status quo Preferring to adherence to non-development, as well as adherence to development and non-development, is preferable to military confrontation. On the other hand, Israel's overall strategy is to prevent the development and shutdown of all Iranian nuclear activities, even at the expense of war (limited or global). Also, the results of this study showed that the game at the point is temporarily stopped and, as a result of the theory of games, the state is the point of equilibrium of the game, this includes Iran's withdrawal from the nuclear program and the development without limitation of the nuclear program, and support the increase of all-round pressures And unilateral and multilateral economic sanctions combined with a limited military strike on Israeli nuclear and military installations.

Abstract:Islamic awakening has had a direct or indirect effect on the countries of the middle east region,and in particular the arab countries of the north africa and the western Asian region.saudi arabia is the largest and most important arab country in western asia.saudi arabia interpreted these developments as contradictory to its regional strategic stability,while recognizing the threat of these denelopments was determined to maintain the status que in some places and to rebuild power elsewhere.in this research,we tried to use the constructivist theory to adopt identity conflicts approaches.this proactive bahraina identity approach has striven to maintain the status que and stailize the rule of al-khalifa as a strategic ally.in a surplus from in Syria,it seeks to change the status que and the structure of power,and ultimately to balance the power with its regional rivaliran.this research uses library resources and documents in from of a descriptive –analytical metod to examine the rule of edentity element such as Arabism,Wahhabism and Islamism on Wahhabism and Islamism on Saudi foreign policy in the middle east region after the islamic awakening.

The present research aims to analyze the concept of security in Realism, Liberalism, Constructivism and Critical theories over the past time periods and the process of traditional theories development hitherto. Thinkers and politicians in particular conjecture strongly that the traditional concept of security is the purpose of the states, first and foremost, for their protection and survival in utmost self-help. The approach towards the element of security exists in the form of traditional assumptions of international relations steeped in military nature, military equipment and the dominant pessimistic perception. Thereupon achievement of absolute security has been prevailed among traditional theories, but the researcher believes that as the time goes by, Liberalism dominates and then subjectivist approaches develop, therefore the fixed meaning of security defined in terms of traditions and Realism no longer exists. Thus the concept of security undergoes changes when redefined. Meanwhile, its scope of meaning has been broadened in the form of different new concepts. By investigating the topics and opinions of the above four approaches thinkers as well as the data and the findings, this study aims to answer the following question, “To what extent has the concept of security undergone changes in the course of development of these four approaches? The provisional answer indicates that security in these approaches encompassing different ontology and epistemology methodologies in the course of time includes a variety of subject areas from new subjects with different interpretations.