فهرست مطالب elham zarinkolah

One of the famous and interesting interpretations of the Shia narrative is Noor al-Saqlain, in which the commentator interprets the verses of the Qur'an by quoting the narrations of Ahl alBayt (a.s.) and a limited number of companions. The effectiveness of Hawizi, one of his journalistic tendencies, has caused him to narrate hadiths that are sometimes contradictory and lead to attributing different views on the same issue to imams without paying attention to the document and the text and checking its authenticity. (A) and as a result the audience will be confused. Of course, the commentator has acknowledged this issue in his commentary, but he has not tried to solve it. Considering the importance of the topic, in this research, by using the library method and critical description in data analysis, the contradictory interpretative narratives in the first 15 parts of the Qur'an from Noor al-Saqlain were extracted, explained and evaluated, and by applying the conflict resolution criteria of preference There have been conflicting traditions. The results show that 19% (about 1200 narrations) of the 6418 narrations transmitted by Imams (a.s.) in this section have apparent differences, which are mostly solved by the methods of apparent summation. Finally, about 2.7% of it contains contradictions, which are often based on criteria such as compatibility with the Qur'an, other narrations, reason, commentators' words, the preference of the Sunad, etc., and one of the two narrations can be preferred.

The science of recitation stands as one of the crucial foundations in interpreting the Noble Quran, playing a vital role in elucidating and comprehending the intentions of the Divine. Contemporary Shiite exegetes, considering Ayatollah Ma’refat's theory, regard the recitation of Hafs from Asim as congruent with the recitation of the masses that has been orally transmitted through generations. Consequently, most contemporary exegetes have confined themselves solely to the prevalent recitation. However, a few interpretations have not adhered strictly to the widely known recitation and seem to reject the theory of conformity between Hafs from Asim's recitation and the generally transmitted recitation since the advent of Islam. Hence, these interpretations prefer non-prevalent recitations in certain instances. Among these interpretations, Khosrowi's interpretation stands out. This present study employs a descriptive-analytical method to investigate this matter within Khosrowi's interpretation. The research findings indicate that the place of recitations in Khosrowi's interpretation, regarding frequency, origins, sources, and the functional aspects of recitations concerning expansion, clarification, and resolution of ambiguity in the meaning of verses, is subject to evaluation

Interpretation of the Quran is one of the most important and fundamental issues in the field of Quranic sciences and interpretation, which has long been the focus of scholars and religious scholars in this field due to its exclusiveness or lack of exclusiveness to God. Narratives are one of the most important sources that guide us to different opinions and views on this matter. In the meantime, Ibn Abbas is one of those who both views on the possibility of interpretation and the impossibility of interpretation are transmitted from him. Therefore, this article, by using the library method, data analysis, sought to resolve the conflict of his narrations in this regard and reached the important conclusion that he believes in the permissibility of interpreting the Qur'an except in the field of analogies such as the time of resurrection. . Extracting the meaning of Mustafad Ibn-Abbas from the mentioned word is the second goal of the present research, which with the analysis and investigations carried out, the functions of "carrying similarities", "tafsir" and "belly" were extracted from his narrations in which the word Tawil and its synonyms were extracted. It has been clearly stated and "determining the example", "carrying on the non-apparent meaning", "interpretation of similar verses", "commentary" and "carrying on the apparent meaning" have been extracted from the content and content of his other narrations in this field; It should be noted that from the total of extracted traditions,

Tafsir Nūr al-Saqalayn is one of the comprehensive and well-known Shiite narrative commentaries, in which according to the topic, under some verses of the Qur'an, there are hadiths quoted from Ahl al-Bayt (as). However, in some cases there are conflicting narratives. Howeyzi himself has mentioned this matter and left the evaluation of this important to the reader. Based on this, in this research, we have evaluated and analyzed these narratives by using the library method, data analysis, while extracting conflicting interpretative narratives; and then we have reached the conclusion that out of about 6418 narrations quoted by imams in the first 15 sections of the Qur'an in this commentary, only 19% (about 1200 narrations that include 261 topics or cases) are subject to conflicting cases, most of which are About 188 of them include primitive and apparent conflicts that are solved by methods such as specializing the general cases, binding the absolute cases, expressing the general expression, Determining the ambiguity, etc.

Ibn ʿAbbās is a famous commentator of early Islam. Many commentary traditions in the Islamic texts have been quoted from him.  Ṭabarī's Jāmiʿ al-Bayān is one of the most comprehensive interpretative sources that contain about six thousand of his narrations. Due to Ibn ʿAbbās' outstanding position in the exegesis, based on Jāmiʿ al-Bayān and by using library sources and the data analysis method, this study, tries to extract his views in different fields of interpretation such as interpretive principles, methods, and attitudes. According to the results, some of his interpretive principles are the belief in both instant and gradual revelations, the divine order of the verses, the collection of the Quran during the Prophet's life, and the permissibility of the Quran's tafsir and taʾwīl. Also, his interpretation methods are mainly the Quran with Quran, the Quran with hadith, and through Ijtihad. Moreover, the literary, jurisprudential, and theological attitudes are very remarkable in his interpretation.

MS. 1075 Tafsir of the Cairene Dar-al-Kutub has been studied from different aspects such as: features of Isnad and Matn, its relation to different ways of transmission in the later tafsirs for example Jami' al-bayan, oral or written transmission, and the possibility of reconstruction the original tafsir of Mujahid. Stauth, Leemhuis, Wansbrough and Versteegh have dealt with all or some of these issues in different works in detail or briefly. In this article these orientalist’s views have been explained and evaluated. The results of the research show that the point of departure for all Western studies in this regard is Sezgin's theory that the authors of narrative works used written sources and also Sezgin’s method to single out the sources of a collector and to reconstruct the early lost works using quotations in later narrative works and his references to this manuscript and transmissions from Mujahid found in al-Tabari's Tafsir. This manuscript is most relateded with I'sa ibn Maymun transmission and indeed this manuscript is not one of the sources of the Jami' al-bayan and is not an extraction from Jami' al-bayan. Reconstruction of the Mujahid exegetical teachings is possible with regarding Sezgin’s theory and Schoeler’s theory.

Absolving is one of the most important issues in Shiite texts and documents. There are some quotes in Shiite documents that clarify absolving Sunni Caliphs, especially first and second Caliphs. That is an important issue in the relations between Muslim branches. This paper tries to evaluate different quotes about absolving Caliphs in Shiite documents. It is done by analyzing library data. The results show that such quotes contradict the verse of Quran invites to unity, especial quotes about absolving, Ahl_al_beyt’s manner, the principle of piety and secrecy, etc., and are not validatable. Some of the reasons for the weakness of such quotes are hierarchy, the unreliability of some narrators, etc., which results through document analysis. Another result of analyzing quotes' origins is the invalidity of some primary sources. However, proving such an issue doesn’t mean denying the Caliphs absolving in Shiite beliefs. Avoiding to declare Caliphs absolving is very important, also swearing and slander.

Abd Allah ibn Abbas is a grand companion of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) and one of the pioneers in exegesis. With regard to his emphasis on seeking knowledge especially learning exegesis from Imam Ali (PBUH) and also the scholars’ mention on this point when explaining his status in exegesis, this article explores the extent of correspondence between his exegetic traditions and the those of Ahl al-Bayt with emphasis on Jame’ al-Bayan Tabari and Noor ath-Thaqlayn Howayzi using library research method and statistical analysis. The results showed that in 80 percent of the traditions, there is either total correspondence or semi correspondence between their traditions through relations such as general-specific, absolute-bounded, and clear-ambiguous. This correspondence exists in different fields including Kalami, Fiqhi, and literary, as well as in subjects such as non-visibility of God, legitimacy of Nikah Mut’ah (temporary marriage), permissible authorization and so on. Document analysis also revealed that most of this correspondence exists in the method of Sa’iid ibn Jobayr, Ali ibn Abi Talheh, Zahhak ibn Mozahem, Ata’, and Mujahid. It is noteworthy that the traditions of ibn Abbas have the most