فهرست مطالب giancarlo a. garcia

To assess the changes in optic nerve head and macular microvascular networks after acute intraocular pressure (IOP) rise in healthy eyes versus the eyes of diabetic patients.

In this prospective, interventional, comparative study, 24 eyes of 24 adults including 12 eyes of healthy nondiabetic subjects and 12 eyes with mild or moderate non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) were enrolled. IOP elevation was induced by a suction cup attached to the conjunctiva. IOP and optical coherence tomography angiographic (OCTA) images of the optic disc and macula were obtained before and immediately after the IOP rise.

Baseline and post-suction IOPs were not significantly different between the two groups (all P > 0.05). The mean IOP elevation was 13.93 ± 3.41 mmHg among all eyes and was statistically significant as compared to the baseline in both groups (both P < 0.05). After IOP elevation, healthy eyes demonstrated a reduction in the vessel density in the whole image deep and superficial capillary plexuses and parafoveal deep capillary plexus (DCP) (all P < 0.05). In diabetic retinopathy, foveal vessel density at DCP decreased significantly following IOP rise (P = 0.003). In both groups, inside disc vessel density decreased significantly after IOP rise (both P < 0.05), however, no significant change was observed in peripapillary vessel density (both P > 0.05).

Acute rise of IOP may induce different levels of microvascular changes in healthy and diabetic eyes. Optic disc microvasculature originating from the posterior ciliary artery may be more susceptible to IOP elevation than that of retinal microvasculature.

To investigate the availability and content of educational statements or recommendations disseminated by U. S. ophthalmologic organizations regarding perioperative management of antithrombotic agents for ophthalmic and orbital surgery, given the highly variable management of these agents by U. S. ophthalmologists and limited consensus recommendations in the literature.

National U. S. ophthalmic surgical organization websites were systematically examined for educational statements, which were reviewed for discussion of perioperative management of antithrombotic agents including antiplatelet and anticoagulant medications. A “statement” was defined as either: (a) a guideline directed toward ophthalmologists or (b) a surgical/clinical educational posting directed toward ophthalmologists or patients.

Fourteen surgical organizations were identified, with eight of these publishing clinical/surgical educational statements. A total of 3408 organizational statements were identified, with 252 (7.4%) and 3156 (92.6%) statements directed toward physicians and patients, respectively. In total, 0.3% (9/3408) of statements discussed perioperative management of antithrombotics. These accounted for 0.8% (2/252) of ophthalmologist‑directed statements and 0.2% (7/3156) of patient‑directed statements. The majority of patient‑directed statements (57.1%, 4/7) recommended that patients discuss antithrombotic cessation with their ophthalmologists, though ophthalmologist‑directed information regarding these medications was scant or absent.

Educational material from U. S. ophthalmologic organizations regarding perioperative management of antithrombotics is notably lacking despite the fact that ophthalmic and orbital surgeries carry unique vision‑threatening hemorrhagic risks. Given these risks, as well as the medicolegal consequences of hemorrhagic complications in ophthalmic surgery, increased dissemination of educational material, and consensus statements by ophthalmic surgical organizations on the perioperative management of antithrombotics may be justified.