فهرست مطالب hassan fadaei

Additional lawsuits are not well known in the Iranian civil procedure legal system, and there has been little discussion of this in legal articles and books. According to the legislature in Article 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, additional lawsuits one of the types of ancillary claim and it is clear to those who know that the design and defense of such claim requires compliance with the procedures set forth in the law mentioned above. Unlike other ancillary claims (counterclaim, impleader and third party intervention), the rules of civil proceedings do not examine its effects and rulings in detail and independently. The question posed in this article is how to properly plan an additional lawsuit in Iranian civil procedure that would logically have a close relationship with the origin of the main lawsuit. The achievement of this article is the submission of an application as a more logical alternative to the petition and the presentation of some new conclusions in accordance with the law and inspired by judicial procedure. By examining the concept, necessity, conditions and rulings of these disputes and analyzing them, the authors have tried to take a small step by shedding light on obscure points.

Take comprehensive and holistic social harm, risks and damage. Check the rights of consumers, from this perspective, a new look and dynamic, because the causes, effects and risk of non-compliance with consumer rights as a kind of social harm, discussed and examined. The first goal of manufacturers of goods and services in the economic cycle profitability. In fact, growers intend to sell their products and earn money in this regard, in some cases, consumer rights, the most important manufacturers of survival is to be applied. Disregard the social consequences of mistrust producers to consumers' rights, prosperity foreign goods, intangible victimization and lack of support from the government and bring the manufacturer. The authors of this paper shows that the foundations of Consumer Rights to the pathology violation of consumer rights and finally conclude that the population of consumers as a single entity, need to deal with the lawsuit group and institution building spontaneous, and finally, the request to amend the consumer protection Act, the community's social ills and dangers, is protected