به جمع مشترکان مگیران بپیوندید!

تنها با پرداخت 70 هزارتومان حق اشتراک سالانه به متن مقالات دسترسی داشته باشید و 100 مقاله را بدون هزینه دیگری دریافت کنید.

برای پرداخت حق اشتراک اگر عضو هستید وارد شوید در غیر این صورت حساب کاربری جدید ایجاد کنید

عضویت

فهرست مطالب hossein akbarialiabad

  • Hossein Akbarialiabad *, Rowena Christiansen, Mohsen Farjoud Kouhanjani, Milad Ahmadi Marzaleh, MohammadHossein Taghrir

    In a rapidly changing environment, healthcare systems in polar regions face increasing pressures imposed by climate change, burgeoning tourism, and potential ramifications for future space exploration. The urgency to reevaluate health stewardship and governance in these areas is driven by unique challenges, including geographical barriers and scarce resources. Further accentuated by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and the anticipated boom in the polar tourism industry, the need for robust emergency, trauma, and surgical care is highlighted. The objective of this paper is to address these challenges and advocate for a unified health governance approach. Adopting measures like artificial intelligence, telemedicine, and advanced technologies is suggested to promote the effectiveness of remote care, considering the distinct limitations of these regions. Moreover, research focused on the human health impact of these extreme conditions is paramount for formulating adequate responses, thereby improving the overall readiness and resilience of the healthcare systems in these regions.

    Keywords: Antarctic, Polar, emergency, Extreme, governance}
  • Mehrdad Askarian, Linda Y. Fu, Mohammad Hossein Taghrir, Roham Borazjani, Zahra Shayan, Ehsan Taherifard, Erfan Taherifard, Hossein Akbarialiabad, Yves Longtin, Ardalan Askarian, Shahin Kavousi
    Background

    In the name of extensive vaccine uptake, understanding the public’s attitude, perception, and intent toward COVID‑19 vaccination is a significant challenge for public health officials.

    Methods

    A cross‑sectional survey via an online questionnaire rooted in the Health Belief Model and Integrated Behavioral Model was conducted to evaluate COVID‑19 vaccination intent and its associated factors. Factor analysis and multivariate logistic regression were operated to be satisfactory.

    Results

    Among the 4,933 respondents, 24.7% were health care workers, and 64.2% intended to accept COVID‑19 vaccination. The adjusted odds (aOR) of COVID‑19 vaccination intent was higher for individuals with greater exposure to social norms supportive of COVID‑19 vaccination (aOR = 3.07, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 2.71, 3.47) and higher perceived benefits of COVID‑19 vaccination (aOR = 2.9, 95% CI = 2.49, 3.38). The adjusted odds of vaccination intent were lower for individuals with greater COVID‑19 vaccine safety concerns (aOR = 0.28, 95%CI = 0.25, 0.31). Lower vaccination intent was also associated with increasing age ((aOR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.98, 0.999), female sex (aOR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.65, 0.88), and working in the health care field (aOR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.63, 0.9).

    Conclusions

    The odds of COVID‑19 vaccination intent were higher three or more times among those with a greater belief in vaccine effectiveness, lower concerns about vaccine safety, and greater exposure to cues to vaccinate, including from doctors. This last finding is concerning as vaccine acceptance was surprisingly lower among health care workers compared to others. The remarkable results of factor analysis and reliability of the questionnaire may encourage local health authorities to apply it to their regional population

    Keywords: Attitudes, beliefs, COVID‑19 vaccine, knowledge, social norms, vaccination}
  • Mahdi Haghighatafshar, Banafsheh Sarmadi, Hossein Akbarialiabad, Fatemeh Shekoohi-Shooli, Tahereh Ghaedian *
    Introduction
    Considering that quantitative methods are usually more reproducible with lower inter-observer variability, the purpose of this research was to compare the prognostic value of the two quantitative method with quantitative perfusion SPECT (QPS) software.
    Methods
    This study was performed prospectively and included 200 participants who were referred for myocardial perfusion imaging. These participants were selected by the convenience sampling method. All patients were followed up after one year. Patients were classified as those with and without major cardiac events, including cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, open-heart surgery, abnormal angiographic findings, and unstable angina.
    Results
    There were 62 male (31.0%) and 138 female (69.0%) patients, ranging in age from 30 to 86 years. The results indicated that the major cardiac events were significantly higher in moderate and severe categories based on summed stress score (SSS) (P=0.024) and total perfusion deficit (TPDs) (P=0.002) scores. SSS score with TPDs score (P = 0.764), summed rest score (SRS) with TPDr score (P = 0.583) and SDS with ΔTPD (P = 0.118) were compatible for predicting major heart events within a year.
    Conclusion
    Total perfusion deficits obtained from QPS software is a useful method for predicting major cardiac events in patients with suspected cardiovascular disease (CVD). Predictive ability of TPD was similar to that of the semi-quantitative method with an expert interpreter's help. Moreover, this method can be helpful for CAD diagnosis and therapeutic evaluation of patients.
    Keywords: Myocardial perfusion imaging, Total perfusion deficits, Quantitative perfusion SPECT software}
  • Mehrdad ASKARIAN, Gary GROOT, Ehsan TAHERIFARD, Erfan TAHERIFARD, Hossein AKBARIALIABAD, Roham BORAZJANI, Ardalan ASKARIAN*, MohammadHossein TAGHRIR
    Background

    The necessity of easing pandemic restrictions is explicit. Due to the harsh consequences of lockdowns, governments are willing to find reasonable pathways to reopen their activities.

    Methods

    To find out the basics of developing a reopening roadmap, on 6th-10th July 2020, we conducted a systematic search on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to review the databases; and Google by manual to review the grey literature. Two independent authors extracted the data, and the senior author solved the discrepancies.

    Results

    Sixteen documents were included. Data categorized into four sections: principals, general recommendations for individuals, health key metrics, and in-phases strategy. The number of phases or stages differed from three to six, with a minimum of two weeks considered for each one. Health key metrics were categorized into four subsets: sufficient preventive capacities, appropriate diagnostic capacity, appropriate epidemiological monitoring, and sufficient health system capacity. These metrics were used as the criteria for progressing or returning over the roadmap, which guarantees a roadmap's dynamicity. Noticeably, few roadmaps did not mention the criteria that may alter the dynamicity of their roadmap. When some areas face new surges, the roadmap's dynamicity is essential, and it is vital to describe the criteria to stop the reopening process and implement the restrictions again.

    Conclusion

    Providing evidence for policymaking about lifting the COVID-19 restrictions seems to be missed in the literature should be addressed more, and further studies are recommended.

    Keywords: COVID-19, Health policy, Global health, Public health}
  • Hossein Akbarialiabad, Asghar Rastegar, Bahar Bastani*

    Many studies have shown the crippling effects of sanctions on the healthcare sector of different countries, including Iran. Long-standing sanctions against Iran escalated recently and severely limited commercial activities with Iran. The devastating consequences of these embargoes have affected all aspects of health care delivery in Iran, limiting the availability of critical medicines and medical devices, and negatively impacting primary health care, treatment of complex diseases including cancer, medical tourism, and medical education and research. The present novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has uncovered this long-standing crisis in the Iranian health care sector. In this communication, we briefly discuss selected aspects of these sanctions and their impact on the health care system and people of Iran during this critical time.

    Keywords: Coronavirus, COVID-19, healthcare, Iran, Outbreak sanctions}
  • Seyedreza Mirsoleymani, Seyyed Mojtaba Nekooghadam, *, Milad Ahmadi Marzaleh, Mahmoudreza Peyravi, Ahmad Soltani, Simintaj Sharififar, Rita Rezaee, Mahnaz Ahmadi, Hossein Akbarialiabad
    Background

    The outbreak of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)has led to a major concern for those who are more vulnerable to infections.

    Objectives

    This study aimed to evaluate the most important risk factors for severe COVID-19 pneumonia.

    Methods

    This retrospective study included information on clinical and epidemiological features of 105 patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia hospitalized in Tajrish Hospital, Tehran, Iran. Initially, the medical records of the patients were investigated, and an interview was conducted based on an already established checklist to seek information about symptoms, past medical history, medication history, and behavior before hospitalization.

    Results

    Out of 105 participants, 76 (72.5%) cases were male, and 54 (51.4%) patients were older than 54 years old. The majority of the patients (n=18; 17.1%) had both hypertension and diabetes (n=12; 11.4%). Metformin (n=36; 34.3%) was the most used medication amongst the studied patient. In addition, 24 (22.9%) patients were recreational hookah smokers, and the majority (75%) of them were under the age of 46 years old. Eventually, 19 patients died, of whom 11 individuals had diabetes, and 10 cases were using metformin.

    Conclusion

    Hookah smoking played a critical role in the spread of COVID-19 in Iran and has made younger people more susceptible. In addition to older age, the immunosuppressive effects of Metformin seem to make diabetic patients with an impaired immune system more vulnerable to severe COVID-19 pneumonia. More studies on the immune system of vulnerable individuals by identifying their differences can help to protect them.

    Keywords: COVID-19, Coronavirus disease 2019, Pneumonia, SARS-Cov-2, Vulnerable}
  • Hossein Akbarialiabad, Hossein Aabdolrahimzadeh Fard, HamidReza Abbasi, Shahram Bolandparvaz, Shahin Mohseni, Vahid Mehrnoush, Mina Salehi, Sima Roushenas, Shahram Paydar *

    During the past few months, the novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has significantly affected medical service provision. In Iran, it has caused around 197,000 inflictions and 9200 deaths up to June 18, 2020. While many departments turned to telehealth in this era, the trauma service should provide non-stop in presence service to the trauma victims. Our trauma center is the largest in the southwest of Iran, with the mean annual admission of 18,500 polytrauma patients. In this center, we designed a safety protocol to mitigate the spread of disease and also have a more robust case finding system, especially among asymptomatic carriers who attend hospitals based on their trauma. In brief, all unstable patients were considered SARS-COV-2 positive and were directed toward the Specialized COVID-19 related ICU. For all stable patients, history, physical examination, CXR, and lab test (Complete Blood Count, Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate, C-Reactive Protein) were ordered before entering the wards. If there was any suspicion of COVID-19, the stable patient was admitted to the COVID-19 specialized ward. Among all 1805 patients admitted during a ten weeks interval (from January 30, 2020, to April 14, 2020), 84 had a red flag and toward to COVID-19 related wards. Of those, 67 had positive PCR or evidence in CT in favor of the COOVID-19. Moreover, during regular workups, we found that 19 completely asymptomatic trauma victims had typical Chest CT scan findings of COVID-19.

    Keywords: COVID-19, Trauma, Surgery, Pandemics, Communicable Disease Control}
  • MohammadHossein Taghrir*, Hossein Akbarialiabad, Milad Ahmadi Marzaleh

    On January 23, 2020, the Chinese government announced the city lockdown of Wuhan. Since then, there have been controversial debates among experts about the efficacy of mass quarantine, the oldest and probably one of the most effective methods for controlling infectious disease outbreaks. The impact of health policymaking section of health system governance becomes visible to all stakeholders and the public in such emergency contexts. The success and failure of such policies should be evaluated in order to find the proper course of action for the local and international communities. In this review, we aim to investigate the efficacy of mass quarantine in China during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We found good quality evidence for the effectiveness of mass quarantine during the current stage of COVID-19 pandemic, and these strategies seem to have been highly effective in controlling the spread of the disease.

    Keywords: COVID-19, Disease outbreaks, Health Policy, Pandemics, Quarantine, Viruses}
بدانید!
  • در این صفحه نام مورد نظر در اسامی نویسندگان مقالات جستجو می‌شود. ممکن است نتایج شامل مطالب نویسندگان هم نام و حتی در رشته‌های مختلف باشد.
  • همه مقالات ترجمه فارسی یا انگلیسی ندارند پس ممکن است مقالاتی باشند که نام نویسنده مورد نظر شما به صورت معادل فارسی یا انگلیسی آن درج شده باشد. در صفحه جستجوی پیشرفته می‌توانید همزمان نام فارسی و انگلیسی نویسنده را درج نمایید.
  • در صورتی که می‌خواهید جستجو را با شرایط متفاوت تکرار کنید به صفحه جستجوی پیشرفته مطالب نشریات مراجعه کنید.
درخواست پشتیبانی - گزارش اشکال