فهرست مطالب ibrahim ali asgari

Human happiness and perfection is indebted to thought and rationality. Intellect and thought also demand freedom and liberty to achieve actual discovery. Freedom of thought means valuing rational explorations and eliminating barriers to this discovery. Intellect has a special status in the Islamic sciences including jurisprudence principles that consider intellect as one of the issues and main sources of inferring rulings. Imam Khomeini (ra) is regarded as one of the salient contemporary jurisprudents and theoreticians and his writings and opinions, as the founder of the Islamic revolution, have always been concerned and investigated by the scholars indoors and outdoors and abundant studies have been conducted on works and ideas of Imam Khomeini (ra), but in this regard, no studies have been made on jurisprudence lessons. This is while intellect is included in the sources of rulings inference and main issues of jurisprudence. Therefore, this paper mainly raises this question that “what status does freedom of thought have in lessons of jurisprudence principles of Imam Khomeini (ra)?” This paper aims to prove that principles of free thinking in theology lessons of Imam Khomeini (ra) at the sublimated level of rationality. To achieve this aim, analytic-descriptive methodology has been applied. Results inferred from jurisprudence lessons of the deceased Imam are as: The deceased Imam not only disagreed on free thinking in the jurisprudence lessons, he has also presented strategies, rules and principles for proper thinking and kept it away from methods that lack rational credibility. Besides, intellect has been given widespread authorities and it is regarded as one of the sources of inference, it is given consideration and attention in inference.

One of the the most vital consumer goods according to the requires of human society and the natural medicines that may have complications and risks for consumers As well as medicines and medical equipment are today of particular complexity.So full advantage of them requires consumer training to will not suffered an accident and to appropriately benefit from the drug. Therefore it is necessary to pharmacists necessary warnings on drug attach and the correct way to teach the use of complex drugs. This issue is also addressed in rules of jurisprudence and warning the discussion placed as a rule. Therefore, no responsibility lifter be effectively any warning. So main issue in this study is whether we can deter pharmaceutical rule according to the warning and the necessary training is not responsible for damages inflicted on the consumer? Under what conditions can warning rule lifter be the responsibility of pharmacists?

In this paper, using the method of study, the results achieved.

Findings:

 According to custom and law, pharmacists are required to provide essential information and warnings to consumers of the drug.

According to warning any kind of warning that such rules are in compliance with the conditions can be issued lifter be the responsibility of pharmacists On the other hand if necessary warning is not issued by the pharmacist he is responsible for any kind of damages that users be entered.

In this research we try using Research Methodology descriptive - analytical, examines the role of ethics in law and explain the real role it as a resource to be independent. The main research question: what position ethics in contemporary law and do it can be considered independent source for legislate? In our opinion ethics in contemporary law is not in its proper place because the majority of contemporary of Jurists ethics equal not consider other sources of law and it is not an independent source, but we assume that the ethics and integrity of stability than other sources of law is because its source is human instinct and intellect that has inherent and general criterion and in any place and any time does not lose their stabilizing. So the authoritative source for ethics can be legislate. Eventually to the conclusion that if ethics in universities and research centers be studied further and can the rules and ethical principles the comprehensive the legislative, That time could and useful to legislate considered a comprehensive source of ethics, in particular in the field of international law.

Human perfection and happiness depends on thinking and reasoning، and rationalism is defined as invitation and encouragement to contemplation and deliberation and also avoidance of restriction from wisdom and thought. Many Islamophobians believe that Islam is incompatible with rationalism. The main question in this paper is that in Islam، accomplishing this in discussions of «principles of jurisprudence» which is the science of Inferring jurisprudence and one of its resources is wisdom، how much credit is allowed for rationalism? The purpose of this paper is to prove the existence of rationalism in a high level in «principles of jurisprudence». Based on the definitions of rationalism، «principles of jurisprudence» has been one of the sciences that has been founded to remove the barriers of reasoning and explore the reality in Islam. To fulfill this objective، a descriptive and analytical research in this field has been done and fundamental issues related to this subject have been raised. Finally، we have concluded that not only is not «principles of jurisprudence» opposed to rationalism، but it has also offered the solutions، rules and regulations for thinking. It takes rationalism away from methods that have not rational credit. It also extends the scope of wisdom and it considers wisdom as one of the resources of inference of jurisprudence.