فهرست مطالب jaafar noruzinejad

The following article seeks to answer the main question: What security approach has the moderate government of Hassan Rouhani put in its agenda during the first term of its presidency (2013-2016)? And more clearly; what are the dimensions, components, and reference, purpose and security strategies in this security approach? The research hypothesis is that the security approach of Hassan Rouhani's government, influenced by the requirements of social fields, had a McNamara approach; In a way, the link between security and development, and especially economic, social and political development, has been a priority. The findings show that the Eleventh Government considers national power to be the result of a broader definition of security and considers it a strategic mistake to limit this concept to military power and the use of harsh tools. It has maximized the issue of security and has tried to improve the national security situation by relying on development policies in the fields of economy, society and politics. Qualitative research method of causal explanation and conceptual and theoretical tools for subject analysis, using the security theory of Barry Buzan and Weaver is one of the leading experts of the Copenhagen school. The method of data collection is also library and also the use of scientific resources of cyberspace.

The forming of revolutionary transformation in Libya the initial optimism created in the minds of the world and the people of Libya that Libya's future will be democratic and development-oriented But the formation of the political events of the after the revolution in the country, reflecting the formed bitter realities in during the reign of dictator Gaddafi. The present paper is the question that what is the main problem of political transition in the post-revolution Libya's? The Findings results show that the formation of a fragile state after the Revolution in Libya, cause growth political and social Difficulties in the country. Therefore the necessity of forming a cohesive and effective government in this country is a major priority of the current.

Iraq is a country with many social cleavages, due to its ethnic and religious diversity, and because pf the inability of its political elite, this feature has always hindered resolving its problems. With the removal of the authoritarian regime of Sadam Hossein, ethnic and religious disputes escalated to their peak. The main question in this article is why has ethnic and sectarian violence exacerbated in Iraq after Saddam Hossein? In response to the question posed, it is argued that the process of international nation-state building or nationstate building from outside that was implemented with a security oriented approach by the US, because of its incompliance with cultural and social features of Iraq, has led to the intensification of sectarian and ethnic violence in the country. The method used in this research is qualitative and causal, using Rogers Brubaker’ theory. Findings of the reseach indicate that identical institutional structures do not work for all societies effectively, and every society’s exclusive capacities and delicacies must be taken into consideration in the process of nation-state building.