فهرست مطالب kamal naderi

Some of the issues which exist in philosophy of religion and New Testament are the issue of revelation and religious experience. The issue is this that, whether divine revelation and religious experience which is posed in the west are one thing and coincide together or not, they are two separate things?In this paper, despite mentioning the reasons of existence of this kind of theory, we state the meanings of revelation in Islam and Christianity and the essence of religious experience and representing some posed theories about both of them as well as speaking of differences between revelation and religious experience. Eventually, this theory is criticized intra-religiously and inter-religiously, and it is proved that this theory not only doesn’t have any epistemological value but also doesn’t have any consistency with divine revelation, and is only a theory for evading the existent conflict between Holy Book doctrines and the deduction of new generation and intellectuals of it.

Understanding of the Quran, among during the Interpertation‘s history had two approaches that they were wrong.At frist, Oriented interpretation without a systematic method and Esoteric interpretations that had no relation with appearance of Quran and the other one is bias on appearance of holy book and Superficiality and without Deep Thought in Divine revelations that results Closure of wisdom in usderstanding of holy Quran. The third approach in understand of the holy Quran, is the Ahl-al-bayt’s method (peace be upon them) that concluded attention to the appearance of Quran’s words and the apparent meaning and trying to reach the Esoteric meanings of that.In this article. After express about the theological approaches. The reasons of them have been discussed and then after reviewing and analyzing two apprroches, the third review that is the practical method of the Prophet and ahl-al-bayt (peace be upon them) has been emphasized and proved with strong reasons.