به جمع مشترکان مگیران بپیوندید!

تنها با پرداخت 70 هزارتومان حق اشتراک سالانه به متن مقالات دسترسی داشته باشید و 100 مقاله را بدون هزینه دیگری دریافت کنید.

برای پرداخت حق اشتراک اگر عضو هستید وارد شوید در غیر این صورت حساب کاربری جدید ایجاد کنید

عضویت

فهرست مطالب karin neysi

  • کریم نیسی، اصلان اگدرنژاد*، فریبرز عباسی

    بهینه سازی مقدار و تقسیط کود نیتروژن می تواند سبب افزایش زمان دسترسی گیاه به این منبع غذایی پرمصرف شده و عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد گیاهان زراعی را افزایش دهد. در این پژوهش به منظور تعیین مصرف بهینه کود نیتروژن برای گیاه ذرت با استفاده از روش سطح-پاسخ، از داده های مستخرج از طرح تحقیقاتی اجرا شده در مزرعه 500 هکتاری موسسه تحقیقات اصلاح و تهیه نهال و بذر در دو سال زراعی استفاده شد. تیمارهای مورد بررسی در طرح مذکور شامل مقدار کود نیتروژن در سه سطح (N1؛ 100 درصد نیاز کودی، N2؛ 60 درصد نیاز کودی و N3؛ 50 درصد توصیه کودی)، زمان تقسیط کود به سه صورت (T1؛ دو تقسیط، T2؛ سه تقسیط و T3؛ چهار تقسیط) و روش آبیاری مزرعه، جویچه ای بود. شاخص های آماری مورد استفاده شامل جذر میانگین مربعات خطا (RMSE)، جذر میانگین مربعات نرمال شده (NRMSE)، میانگین خطای اریب (MBE)، کارایی مدل (EF)، شاخص توافق (d) و ضریب تبیین (R2) است. نتایج نشان داد که مدل رگرسیونی مورد استفاده قابلیت پیش بینی صفات عملکرد، وزن هزار دانه، تعداد دانه در ردیف، تعداد ردیف در بلال، طول بلال و میزان روی دانه را داشت. بنابراین مدل برای همه صفات دچار خطای کم برآوردی (0 ≥ MBE) شد. دقت مدل رگرسیونی برای میزان روی دانه در دسته خوب (0.2 ≥ NRMSE ≥0.1) و برای سایر صفات در دسته عالی (1/ 0≥ NRMSE ≥ صفر) قرار داشت. به جز تعداد ردیف در بلال، سایر صفات با افزایش مقدار کود و تقسیط آن افزایش یافتند. نتایج بهینه سازی کلیه صفات نشان داد که، اگر نیاز کودی به صورت کامل (N1) و تعداد تقسیم به پنج نوبت افزایش یابد؛ مقدار عملکرد، وزن هزار دانه، تعداد دانه در ردیف، طول بلال و مقدار روی دانه به ترتیب 6، 9، 12، 18.5 و 19.6 درصد نسبت به مقادیر حداکثر این متغیرها افزایش خواهد یافت. بنابراین، اعمال این سناریو در مزرعه برای بهبود عملکرد و شاخص های عملکردی مانند غلظت روی دانه ذرت پیشنهاد می شود.

    کلید واژگان: اجزای عملکرد, تقسیط کود, طرح مربع مرکزی, غلظت روی}
    Karin Neysi, Aslan Egdernezhad *, Fariborz Abbasi
    Introduction

    Corn is one of the most widely consumed cereals in the world, which is highly compatible with many climates. For this reason, corn has been cultivated in most regions of the world since ancient times. Therefore, it is also considered a part of people's food all over the world. The effect of nitrogen fertilizer, as an agricultural solution, on the growth and yield of corn has caused it to be split to increase the plant's access time to this nitrogen source. In fact, due to the leaching of nitrogen fertilizer, it is usually not applied in one step. For this reason, based on the prevailing conditions of the field, the operators divide it into two or more divisions and perform nitrogen fertilization during the growth period. In each division, it is necessary to determine and apply the optimal amount of nitrogen fertilizer in order to minimize environmental pollution in addition to being economical. It requires many field experiments, which require a lot of time and money. To solve this problem, the use of simulation and optimization models, such as response-surface modeling, is suggested. The response-surface method is one of the suitable optimization tools that has been considered in various sciences for many years. The statistical basis of this method is very complex and uses a multi-objective nonlinear model for optimization and modeling. The response-surface method first provides a suitable combination of treatments, and by considering them, a statistical model is created that has the best fit compared to other models. Next, the most optimal value is determined for the independent variables so that the value of the dependent variables reached their maximum or minimum.

    Materials and Methods

    For this purpose, the data collected from a research project, which was carried out in the 500-hectare farm of the Seedling and Seed Research Institute in two years (2011-2012), were used. Two factors consisted of fertilizer in three levels (N1: 100 and N2: 60% and N3: 50% of fertilizer requirement) and the time of splitting into three methods (T1: the farmer's application with two splittings; T2: three equal divisions and T3: four equal divisions) was considered. The response surface method was used to optimize yield and yield components. In the response-surface method, the code of -1, 0, and +1 for nitrogen indicates 50, 60, and 100 kg/ha of nitrogen fertilizer, respectively. The code of -1, 0, and +1 for fertilizer splitting indicates the number of 2, 3, and 4 nitrogen fertilizer splitting during the growing season, respectively. In this method, to fit the data, multivariate regression was used by adding linear terms, quadratic, and interaction between factors. Then, regression was evaluated based on the analysis of variance. The statistical criteria used included root mean square error (RMSE), normalized root mean square error (NRMSE), mean bias error (MBE), model efficiency (EF), index of agreement (d), and coefficient of explanation (R2).

    Results and Discussion

    The results of ANOVA showed that the linear and quadratic regression model for seed yield and the linear regression model for fertilizer efficiency was significant at the 5 % probability level (P-value ≤ 0.05). For water productivity, the splitting factor had a greater effect on the regression than the amount of fertilizer, although both factors did not show a significant effect. The regression model had a significant effect on the 1000 seed weight, number of seeds in a row, number of rows in a cob, cob length, and seed size. The regression of other variables was not statistically significant. Therefore, the response-surface method can be used to predict and optimize variables with significant regression. The results showed that the regression model was capable of predicting variables including 1000 seed weight, number of seeds in a row, number of rows in a cob, corn length, and seed zinc content. But this model had an underestimation error (MBE ≤ 0.0) for all variables. The accuracy of the regression model for grain zinc content was in a good category (0.1 < NRMSE < 0.2) and for other variables in the excellent category (0.0 <NRMSE< 0.1). By increasing the amount of fertilizer (changing from code -1 to + 1), the yield initially decreased and then increased. With the increase of fertilizer splitting, corn yield decreased first and then increased. The effect of the amount and splitting of fertilizer on changes in the 1000 seed weight was linear and with the increase of these two factors, the 1000 seed weight also increased. This result was also observed for the number of seeds in the cob. In terms of cob length and grain zinc percentage, the two factors of fertilizer amount and splitting had similar effects on the increase of these two variables, but at low values of both factors, the mentioned variables decreased slightly. Increasing the amount and distribution of fertilizer caused an increase in the number of rows in the cob, but high amounts of these two factors had no effect on the increase in the number of rows in the cob. Except for the number of rows, other variables increased along with increasing the amount of fertilizer and its splitting. Providing 100% fertilizer requirement and increasing the number of divisions to 5 times, can increase maize yield by up to 1.5 tons per hectare. This was about 28% of the average yield and 6 % of the maximum corn yield in this study. The weight of the thousand seeds increased to 3.5 grams under optimal conditions, which increased by 32 and 9 % compared to the average and maximum values in this study, respectively. The variable of the row was not much of a change in the average variable (1.5 cm) and increased by only 1 %. The optimal length increased to 3.5 cm and the optimal rate increased to 62%.

    Conclusion

    In general, the optimization results of all variables showed that if the fertilizer requirement is applied as N1 and in five splittings; the amount of yield, 1000 seed weight, the number of seeds in a row, the length of the cob and the amount of seed will increase by 6, 9, 12, 18.5, and 19.6% respectively compared to the maximum values of these variables. Therefore, it is suggested to apply this scenario in the field to improve yield and yield criteria such as zinc concentration in corn seeds.

    Keywords: Central Square Design, Fertilizer Splitting, Seed Zinc Content, Yield Criteria}
بدانید!
  • در این صفحه نام مورد نظر در اسامی نویسندگان مقالات جستجو می‌شود. ممکن است نتایج شامل مطالب نویسندگان هم نام و حتی در رشته‌های مختلف باشد.
  • همه مقالات ترجمه فارسی یا انگلیسی ندارند پس ممکن است مقالاتی باشند که نام نویسنده مورد نظر شما به صورت معادل فارسی یا انگلیسی آن درج شده باشد. در صفحه جستجوی پیشرفته می‌توانید همزمان نام فارسی و انگلیسی نویسنده را درج نمایید.
  • در صورتی که می‌خواهید جستجو را با شرایط متفاوت تکرار کنید به صفحه جستجوی پیشرفته مطالب نشریات مراجعه کنید.
درخواست پشتیبانی - گزارش اشکال