فهرست مطالب mahdiye sadeghian

Investigating the owners' civil liability to injuries of firefighters during rescue attempts has a long history in the United States. In this legal system, the firefighters generally are prohibited from recovering damages from owners and occupants who their negligence has caused a fire or other accidents. This rule commonly is called the fireman's rule. However, Because of lawyers’ criticisms of that rule, it has been rejected or exceptions has restricted it in some states. Unlike the United States, there have been no coherent studies in this area in Iranian law. Therefore, the analysis of the issue is possible only with the generalities of civil liability. The analysis of these generalities shows where the fireman’s injuries are the result of the owner's indirect loss (tasbib), the firefighter will not be entitled to damages for injuries related to the essential reason of his presence at the scene of the accident. But if the injuries are not related to accident required presence of him in the scene, he will be strictly liable of the damages, provided that the firefighter enters land with the permission of the owner. but if he enters land with the legal permission, his liability will be based on fault.

The Rescue Doctrine is the focus of discussion on the civil liability of those endangering others toward Good Samaritans in American law. It means that rescuer who has been injured during the rescue have the right to receive compensation from a person that his harmful and culpable actions led to the need for that rescue operation, even if the attempt to save is unsuccessful. Because the harm incurred by the rescuer is the predictable result of negligence. In Iranian law, despite of not specifying this doctrine, the result of the analysis of the generalities of civil liability in the form of the Tasbib Institution is similar to American law and the damages to the rescuer can be claimed from causing of danger.