majid ma'aref

One of the methods of interpreting Qur'an which has been given attention in recent years by the efforts of Allameh Tabatabai and after him by Ayatollah Javadi Amoli is the method of Quran by Quran interpretation. Ayatollah Javadi Amoli in the preface of his Tafsir, along with studying the scientific foundations of this method, adduced to the comprehensiveness of Quran by referring to the verse «» یء ش لک ل یانا ب; ت Qur'an contains all the sciences and explanatory of all things, therefore, it is primarily needless of anything else to explain its own intentions including Sunnah. By studying the intention of holy Quran from “کل شیء” and clarifying its explaining domain according to the traditions and lack of necessary Tebyan in the surface of Quran, it becomes clear that realizing comprehensiveness of Quran in explanation of all issues without referring to Mobayyen of Quran is not feasible. Therefore, referring to it to prove Hujjiyat of the method of Quran by Quran has some deficits. This article is to explain this adduction through the ideas of Ayatollah Javadi Amoli and then study the deficits.

The only written, printed, and accessible work of interpretation attributed to the infallible Imams (a.s.) is the commentary attributed to Imam Hasan Askari (a.s.). This commentary was dictated by him, written by two people named Abu al-Hasan and Abu Yaghub, and has come to us through different people. Having an understanding of this commentary can help us appreciate the words of Imam Hasan Askari (a.s.) and how it is attributed to him. So far, no serious effort has been made to introduce this work attributed to the infallible Imam (a.s.). Therefore, knowing the structure and arrangement of Tafsir al-Askari will help us make better use of it. Research studies reveal that, among the short, medium-size, and long interpretational narrations attributed to Imam Hasan Askari (a.s.), the short narrations have the most evidence and correspondence with other narrations, the average ones have relatively less evidence and correspondence, and most of the long ones often lack Quranic evidence and correspondence with other narrations, and they are often among the isolated narrations. Having cognizance of the narrations of Tafsir al-Askari and their classification into short, average, and long, voluminous narrations not only help us with attributing Tafsir al-Askari to the Imam (a.s.), but it makes us mindful of the existence of erroneous material that may be taken for the mistakes of narrators, copiers, or the infiltration of the forgery of forgers. Finally, the present study can have a significant impact on the authentication of Tafsir al-Askari.

The Holy Qur'an is a knowledgeable and realistic book which, according to Qur'anic verses, narrations and wisdom, needs to be elaborated and interpreted. Throughout the history of many commentators, based on the methods, trends, and various interpretive schools, they have interpreted this celestial book. Accordingly, the Qur'an's interpretation has evolved and until the present day, complete interpretations or some parts of the Qur'an have been written, interpretation has continued. Among these, the book "The Interpretation of the Eleventh Surah from the Holy Qur'an" by Mr. DharullahMashayekhi, by the side publications, has been compiled for the course of the disciplinary interpretation of the Qur'anic verses and the theology of theology. In this article, the advantages and disadvantages of this book are criticized and evaluated in terms of its form and content. Due to existing deficiencies, it is suggested that after applying scientific editions as the source of the course of interpretive interpretation in the baccalaureate.

The jurisprudence of traditions, enjoys an elevated stance among the Imams' teachings. This is to the extent that it is said: "understanding one tradition is worthier than repeating a thousand." Several fundamental principles are stressed upon by the Imams for a clear understanding of the traditions. The most significant conditions are: striving to communicate the self same words, having the license to communicating the meanings instead of the words under specific circumstances, paying added attention to the extensiveness of the meanings of words, paying added attention to understanding the difference between figurative and literal meanings of the sayings, using effective strategies in order to solve the apparent conflict or contrast between the sayings, avoiding oblivion in depicting the hierarchy and diversity of sayings.