فهرست مطالب manan patel

Acute compartment syndrome of the thigh (CST) is an ongoing challenge for orthopaedic surgeons as the diagnosis is often difficult to establish. Currently, there is a shortage of studies investigating risk factors for the development of thigh compartment s yndrome following subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures. This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with the development of CST following femoral fractures. Retrospective review performed in a level one trauma center from January 2011 to December 2020 for all patients with non-pathological acute subtrochanteric or diaphyseal femoral fractures. Variables collected included demographics, injury severity score (ISS) scores, mechanism of injury, classification of femoral fracture, open versus closed injuries, development of compartment syndrome, time to compartment syndrome diagnosis, number of subsequent surgeries, and primary wound closure versus split-thickness skin graft. The statistical analysis of this study included descriptive analysis, simple logistic regression, paired T-test, and Wilcoxon Signed Rank. Thirty-one (7.7%) patients developed thigh compartment syndrome following 403 subtrochanteric or diaphyseal femoral fractures. The mean (SD) age for those who developed CST was 27.35 (8.42). For every unit increase in age, the probability of developing CST decreased. Furthermore, male gender had 18.52 times greater probability of developing CST (P <0.001). AO/OTA 32-C3 and subtrochanteric femoral fracture patterns demonstrated 15.42 (P = 0.011) and 3.15 (P <0.001) greater probability of developing CST, respectively. Patients who presented to the hospital following a motor vehicle accident (MVA) or gunshot wound (GSW) had 5.90 (P= 0.006) and 14.87 (P < 0.001) greater probability of developing CST, respectively.  Patients who were male, younger in age, and had a 32-C3 and subtrochanteric femoral fractures were at increased probability of developing CST. High energy trauma also increased the risk of developing CST. A high index of suspicion should be expressed in patients with these risk factors. Level of evidence: III

Accurate analysis of preoperative shoulder pain and function is important for understanding treatment efficacy and producing high-quality research. Oftentimes, preoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are missing. Therefore the accuracy of recalled preoperative PROs may be significant. We investigate the ability of patients who underwent rotator cuff repair (RCR) or shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) to recall their preoperative PROs. We identified 145 patients who underwent either RCR or TSA and had preoperative PROs. All patients completed the ASES, SANE, SST, and VAS surveys within 3 months prior to surgery. Patients were contacted between one and four years after surgery and asked to recall their baseline pain and shoulder function prior to surgery. The mean difference was calculated by determining the difference between the mean recalled score and the mean actual score. Intraobserver reliability analysis was performed, comparing recall and actual score for each using the 2-way mixed-effects intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) model. The ICC values > 0.75 were considered excellent, values between 0.4 and 0.75 were considered moderate, and values of < 0.4 demonstrated a weak agreement.  For patients who underwent RCR, the mean differences between actual and recalled ASES, SANE, SST and VAS pain were 6.3 (P=0.004), 2.0 (P=0.155), -0.04 (P=0.625) and - 1.0 (P<0.001), respectively. In patients who underwent TSA, the mean differences between actual and recalled ASES, SANE, SST and VAS pain were 4.5 (P =0.038), -3.9 (P=0.262), -1.2 (P=0.001) and -1.5 (P<0.001), respectively. ASES, SST, and VAS show moderate reliability, and SANE reliability was weak in both RCR and TSA populations. Patients had a tendency to recall higher pain scores than actual preoperative pain scores.  In patients who underwent RCR or TSA, there was too much variability between individual patient’s ability to accurately recall preoperative pain and function to reliably use recall data for research purposes. Level of evidence: IV

Multiple surgical techniques for fixation of Neer type IIB distal clavicle fractures have been described without consensus on optimal treatment. The purpose of this study is to compare functional and radiographic results with surgical management of Neer type IIB distal clavicle fractures at a single institution. Sixty-three patients with acute Neer type IIB fractures treated operatively were evaluated. Patients with a minimum of two year follow up were included. Functional scores included American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and Likert patient satisfaction (1 to 5). Radiographs were assessed for osseous union and coracoclavicular (CC) distance. Thirty-eight patients met inclusion with a mean follow-up of 5.3 years. Patients were divided into five groups based on fixation technique: suture-only CC fixation (n=6), CC screw fixation only (n=3), open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) without CC fixation (n=8), hook plate fixation (n=4), and ORIF with suture CC reconstruction (n=17). Outcome scores for the entire cohort were 91.8 for ASES, 90.2 for SANE, and 10.8 for STT. Patients with hook plates had significantly lower SANE score (p=0.016), but no other significant differences in functional, satisfaction, or radiographic outcomes were found between groups. Sixteen patients (42.1%) required reoperation. Treatment of Neer type IIB fractures via suture- only fixation, plate-only fixation, or a combination of both demonstrated satisfactory mid to long term outcomes. While implant removal was more common in the CC screw and ORIF groups, no fixation technique proved functionally superior. Level of evidence: IV

As preferred treatment options for superior labral tears continue to evolve, this study aims to describethe recent longitudinal trends in the treatment of SLAP tears in a sub-specialized practice at a single institution. Wehypothesized that there was a trend toward biceps tenodesis over repair for Type II SLAP lesions. A retrospective review was performed using an institutional billing database to identify all patients with aSLAP tear who underwent surgical intervention between January 2002 and January 2016. Procedural codes associatedwith the surgery were analyzed to determine type of treatment each patient received. Of the 6,055 patients who underwent surgery for a SLAP tear during the study period, 39.1% (2,370)underwent labral repair, 15.4% (930) underwent tenodesis without repair, and 45.5% (2,755) underwent arthroscopywithout tenodesis or repair. Labral repair made up a significantly higher proportion of surgical interventions in 2002(82.2%) compared to in 2015 (21.8%; P<0.001). Surgeon experience did not impact trends. Over the study period,the mean age of patients receiving labral repair decreased from 40.4 years (range: 16.2 – 63.9) to 32.6 years (range:14.0 – 64.7; P<0.001). This study demonstrates that over the 14-year study period the rate of labral repairs for SLAP tears hasdecreased significantly and that these repairs have been directed towards a younger patient population.Level of evidence: III