masha shirani

Infertility affects about 15% of the population and male factors only are responsible for ~25–30% of cases of infertility. Oxidative stress is an imbalance between the production of free radicals and the capacity of the body to counteract their harmful effects through neutralization by antioxidants. This study aims to access the relationship between non-enzymatic dietary antioxidant capacity and male infertility.

In this cross-sectional study, 270 infertile men aged 18-55 years were selected from Isfahan province in 2018. Semen assessment was performed according to the fifth edition of the WHO laboratory manual and a 168-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) questionnaire was used to determine the amount of dietary intakes of participants. P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

There were no significant association between sperm parameters and dietary total antioxidant capacity (DTAC) tertiles in the crude model and after adjustment for potential confounders. The participants in the highest tertile of DTAC had a higher risk of abnormal density and motility in crude model (OR=1.30; 95% CI: 0.65, 2.59; P = 0.46 and OR=1.69; 95% CI: 0.83, 3.44;
P = 0.99) and risk of abnormal density decreased in the adjusted model (OR=0.99; 95% CI: 0.39, 2.50; P = 0.99) and (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: 0.51, 4.01;
P = 0.5).

In this cross-sectional study there was no significant relationship between semen parameters and DTAC tertiles in the crude and adjusted model. Therefore, it is required to conduct more research studies to determine the clear benefits and risks of antioxidant therapy for infertility.

This cross-sectional study pointed to assess the relationship between major dietary patterns and dietarydiversity score with semen parameters, in infertile Iranian males.

In this cross-sectional study, 260 infertile men (18-55 years old) who met the inclusioncriteria, entered the study. Four Semen parameters, namely sperm concentration (SC), total sperm movement (TSM),normal sperm morphology (NSM) and sperm volume were considered according to spermogram. A 168-item foodfrequency questionnaire (FFQ) was used to collect dietary intakes and calculate dietary diversity score. Factor analysiswas used to extract dietary patterns.

The following four factors were extracted: “traditional pattern”, “prudent pattern”, “vegetable-based pattern” and“mixed pattern”. After adjusting potential confounders, those in the highest quartile of the traditional pattern had 83% lessodds for abnormal concentration, compared with the first quartile (OR=0.17, 95% CI: 0.04-00.73); however, subjects inthe highest quartile of this pattern had 2.69 fold higher odds for abnormal sperm volume as compared with those of thefirst quartile (95%Cl: 1.06-6.82). Men in the second quartile of prudent pattern had 4.36 higher odds of an abnormal spermvolume in comparison to the reference category (95%CI: 1.75-10.86), after considering potential confounders. With regardto mixed pattern, men in the second, third and fourth quartile of this pattern had respectively 85 (5%Cl: 0.03-0.76,), 86(95%Cl: 0.02-0.75) and 83 % (95%Cl: 0.034-0.9) less odds of abnormal concentration, compared with the first quartile.Additionally, no significant association was found between dietary diversity score and sperm quality parameters.

Higher intake of the traditional diet was linked to lower abnormal semen concentration and poorer spermvolume. Also, the mixed diet was associated with reduced prevalence of abnormal semen concentration.