فهرست مطالب mohammad rahimi khoigani

An underexplored topic in the realm of Arabic-Persian translation is the impact of translation on political discourse. The study of political discourse in translation centers on the unavoidable ideological modifications that take place in any text throughout the process of translation, which warrant careful examination and evaluation. Hence, the objective of this study is to examine several renditions of the dialogues between the Qatari Minister and the Saudi envoy during the commencement of the 148th session of the Arab League. This research aims to investigate the translation and representation of a single text by multiple media outlets, taking into account their ideological and political perspectives. Drawing on Christina Schäffner's theory and utilizing a descriptive-analytical technique, the study intends to determine the variations in translation and representation among these channels. The results of this study imply that both internal and external beliefs have an impact on translation modifications, and that various media platforms have altered the language and structure of the original text through word choice, grammatical changes, and textual reproduction.

In recent years, with the acceleration of the translation of texts from Arabic to Persian, the need to critique standard translation is becoming more and more apparent. Therefore The purpose of this article is to review the Persian translation of the book " Persian inscriptions on an Arabic painting, based on the theory of "Farzaneh Farahzad's Translation Choices"; Therefore, the choices of translations of the mentioned book were examined in three levels of text, context and symbols, and it was found that the translation changes made at the level of text are often with a specific purpose and can be justified; Of course, sometimes these changes are caused by the mistakes of translators. Also, at the contextual level, the type of writing of the translators' introduction has caused the audience of the book to have no pre-presentation of the contents of the text and the method of translation. The design of the cover and the type of line that is examined at the sign level are among the strengths of translation

Translating ambiguities, especially the ambiguities of the Qur'an as a sacred text has  always proved difficult because the style and methods used in Qur'anic ambiguities are flawless,consistent and rhetorical. The present article examines the translation of ambiguity in Persian and Chinese, to first determine how translators deal with the category of ambiguity and secondly to examine the differences between the two languages in cultural choices. For this purpose, among the Persian translations, an ancient translation - the translation of Abolfotuh Razi - and a contemporary translation - the translation of Garmaroodi - and among the Chinese translations, the translation of "Suleiman Bai zhisuo" has been selected. Thefindings indicate that Razi, in the face of multiple aspects of a word or ambiguous structure, usually chooses one aspect while omiting other aspects. Garmaroodi is more focused on conveying the semantic plurality in the original text using footnotes and parenthesis while Suleiman focuses on conveying a vague word or structure in Chinese.

Translation is the most important way of communication among cultures, and every literary text must be able to pass through this passage and gain acceptance in the target language in order to continue living. How one or more translation works are accepted in the target language and culture are the important and common concern of comparative literature and research translation.Relying on the poly-system theory in the translated literature, the present article tries to concentrate on the translation as a section of cultural, literary and historical organ of language, it attempts to show why and how the works of Gibran Khalil Gibran have been accepted in the Iranian culture and literature. The most important findings of this research which is written with a descriptive-analytical method, are that according to “poly-systems theory” acceptance of the works of Gibran also depends on pre-translation issues such as the choice of the work, the subject, the viewpoint, the norms and the post-translational issues such as the dynamic market, the publisher's credibility and the confirmation of the cultural elements.

This research aims at studying and criticizing Mohammad Dashtee’s selections in his translation from Nahjolbalaghe according to meaning and terminology level of Garces translation assessment. For this purpose, Garces thesis has been introduced, then the elements that were applicable to Dashtee’s translation had been explained in details. The main findings of this research based on analytical-descriptive approach show that Dashtee in his lexical selecting is relying usually on the lexical extension at different models and above all on interpretive and ideological explanation. He has removed lexical ambiguities of Emam Ali’s speech or interpreted them according to his opinion, and tried not to be any ambiguous words in his work.

The pun is one of the most important types of rhetorical figures. Two pillars or two conditions for the realization of an absolute pun include both the same spelling and sound and different meanings. Although the verbal similarity of two homonymic words has been discussed so far, the semantic dissonance of the two words has not yet been taken into account for various reasons. Therefore, it is not yet lucid which of the different meanings of a word is of interest and what the meaning difference is. In the current study, the descriptive-analytical method was used to both investigate the origin of absolute pun according to the views of past linguists and lecturers and contemporary scholars and determine what kind of meaning is intended in this type of pun in line with the rhetorical heritage of Persian and Arabic. An absolute pun is made by two words which are the same in type, grammatical number, ordering, and morphology of phonemes and includes several modes: both words are simple and morphologically similar (Momathel i.e., similar) or not similar (Mostawfi i.e., absolute), one or both words are compound words (Marfovv: darned by, Molaffaq: combined). The meaning difference is controversial only in the first two types and is clear in two other types, which are not the subject of this study. The processes of homonym and polysemy lead to verbal similarities and semantic differences amongst words. Ancient and contemporary linguists believe there are a variety of causes for polysemy, but past linguists unlike nowadays’ logicians, fundamentalists, and semanticists do not distinguish such causes and consider all polysemies as homonyms. The attitude of past linguists has been found in absolute puns, so the type of meaning difference has been remained ambiguous. The origin and scope of absolute puns can be revealed through investigating the ideas of rhetoric scholars, evidence in oratory books, and aesthetic evaluation of types of meaning. Rhetoric scholars’ ideas and evidence in oratory books demonstrate there are two ideas on the origin and scope of absolute puns: polysemies and homonyms, regardless of the effect of types of meaning on the exquisiteness of absolute puns. The assessment of the effect of types of meaning on the exquisiteness of absolute pun according to the intensity of meaning differences introduce the following ordering: verbal transformation, reinstating, deletion, forwarding meaning, metaphor, changing usage, primary and secondary meaning, and sub-layers of meaning. The results of the present study depicted that the absolute pun in the past was influenced by the perspective of linguists, so nowadays it can be influenced too. In other words, its origin and scope can comprise polysemies and homonyms. Considering this issue, the assessment of absolute pun examples is necessary. Therefore, the intensity of meaning differences can be chosen as a good standard for categorizations. Eventually, the pun can be a two-dimensional (i.e. literal- semantic) figure of speech.

Diversity of «Ya» is one of the most important issues in the Persian language that has been less studied to this time، This study intends to rely on various books of grammar and common language of the people، to find all kinds and types of «Ya” And present a complete classification of the it، Classification according to the authors، is comprehensive and complete The main findings of this study that has been written by the analyzing and decrypting method indicate that there are very types for» Ya«that have been neglected.

Irving Goffman's stigma theory suggests that social stigma can result from the perception of physical, racial and personal traits. This disapproval is attached to the person as a stigma and effects the person's character and how one lives in the society. This study intends to rely on this theory to analyze the development of the titles of the Arabic poets and its influence on their social behavior. The main findings of this study has been achieved through a descriptive- analytical method; it shows that one of the formation of the titles of the Arabic poets is mainly by physical, personal, and racial traits, that can well be studied using Goffman's theory. In this research, reaction of poets such as Antarah, Shanfari, Tabbeta Sharan, and Hota towards their physical and racial stigma are quite different and can be studied through their poems and sayings.

In the Persian language، adaptation between the bench andnominal benchfar from، hasbeen neglected. So that in the books، notto mentionit at all This study that is written by analyzing-descriptive method and rely on “Saadis Ghazal” shows that the this adaptation of the Persian language is veryuseful and it may by entered Persian from Arabic or the old Ancient Persian language.

Structuralism analysis of literary texts is one of the most popular ways to analyze text from a Twentieth Century to. This time, the founder of this Theory is “Barthes”, he offered a model that based on five codes.This study that written by analytical and descriptive method is select the “Tofigh Hakims” short story by name: “Satan wins” and tries to analyze it by structuralism view, the major findings of this study shows that the story has a nice example for structural analysis and it is very nice to analyzed by “Actor Model” that suggested by “Gremas” to explains the role of characters.