فهرست مطالب moharramzadeh m

The aim of this study was to identify and test the social responsibility model of Persepolis Club with satisfaction, loyalty and future attendance of spectators. The research method was descriptive and correlation and the statistical population consisted of all Persepolis fans attending PersepolisTabriz Mashinsazi match on May 11, 2019 (one of the Iran premier league matches). The sample size was calculated using Krejcie and Morgan table (n=381) by simple random sampling method. Jalali Farahani and Sajjadi Social Responsibility Questionnaire (2012), Oliver Audience Satisfaction Questionnaire (1997), Mousavi, Elahi and Hadavi Attitudinal Loyalty Questionnaire (2013), Mousavi, Elahi and Hadavi Behavioral Loyalty Questionnaire (2013), Lim Attendance Tendency Questionnaire (2006) were used to collect data. Inferential statistics including confirmatory factor analysis test, structural equation modeling to measure the internal consistency of the questionnaire items were used and Pearson correlation test and univariate regression test were applied to determine the relationships and predict the research variables. These statistical tests were performed by SPSS22 software. The results showed a significant positive relationship between social responsibility of Persepolis Club and spectators’ satisfaction. There was also a positive significant relationship between spectators’ satisfaction and attitudinal and behavioral loyalty and between attitudinal and behavioral loyalty and future attendance of spectators. There was a positive significant relationship between attitudinal loyalty and behavioral loyalty. Given these findings, it is recommended that managers of sport clubs and organizations should pay more attention to the dimensions and activities of social responsibility and to consider such activities in their long-term plans.

The present study examined the relationship between coach's leadership styles and group cohesion in the individual and group teams participating in the 10th sport domestic universiade of male students. 321 out of 1906 students selected as sample of this study. Athletes completed two instruments in this study; Leadership Scale for Sport (LSS, Chelladurai & Saleh, 1980) and the Group Environment Questionnaire (GEQ, Carron, Widmeyer, & Brawley, 1985). The LSS contains 40 items that measures five dimensions of leadership styles and The GEQ with 18 items assess the two dimensions group cohesion. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was utilized to examine the internal reliability of LSS (r=0.85) and GEQ (r=0.72). Data were analyzed with one-sample kolmogrov-Smirnov, repeated measures ANOVA, Bonfferoni post hoc test,Pearson Correlation coefficient, and T-test(for independent groups), significance level of P≤0.05. Results showed coaches exhibited higher in training and instruction and lower in autocratic style among both interactive group teams and co-acting teams. Finally, there are no significant differences in task and social levels of interactive group teams and co-acting teams. Results showed coach’s styles of training and instruction, democratic, social support and positive feedback were all positively correlated to group cohesion and autocratic style negatively correlated to group cohesion.