فهرست مطالب mohsen rahiminia

Always explaining the dimensions and studying foreign policy of Iranian past governments is a way to determine the policy and area of decision-making for the future. By analyzing the foreign policy of the Pahlavi regime, this point comes to mind that Iran has had a constant fear of the Soviets and this kind of Soviet phobia plays an important role in the policies and strategies of its foreign relations. This article attempts to explain the factors and sources of Soviet phobia in the second Pahlavi regime and Describes its role in the foreign policy decision-making process. In this regard, by analyzing the subject by modeling and combining two theories of Marvin Zeonis' political psychology and James Rozna's theory of continuity, and by explaining the sources: person, role, structure of government, social structure, transnational factors or international system, the dimensions of Soviet phobia and its impact on the foreign policy decision-making process of Pahlavi II.In this article has been used  Descriptive-explanatory method.

This article tries to address the issues of the eleventh presidential election, and discusses the conduct of Dr. Hassan Rouhani's election discourse as a candidate for the presidential election of the eleventh period, and to answer by means of discourse analysis method the question of "how the hegemony of the discourse of moderation in the eleventh presidential election is explained? In this research, our claim is that t The claim of the article is that the components of the victorious candidate discourse in the eleventh presidential election are more based on the diverse articulation of different slogans, myths and alteration in its relation to the discourse governing the tenth government, the availability and credibility of the discourse of moderation in society and having a political subjectivity can be analyzed. The findings of this paper show that the discourse of moderation in the discursive struggle was more hegemonic due to the position of subjectivity and political subjectivity, more active and coherent, the use of the process of marginalization and highlighting, more effective access and credibility than other competing discourses.

The weakness and the decline of Pahlavi government in Bahman of 1357 (February of 1979) was due to the act of different groups specially advocates of the political Islam discourse, which presented its desired myth in an instable atmosphere, subsequently, attracted the floating signifiers and collected them into an equivalent sequence. All these things together result in the expansion of its hegemony and defeat of Pahlavi discourse. At last, the so-called political Islam discourse represented itself as the prevailing one among its competitors. Answering the reasons of the conflict among political discourses, we can say, according to the study, that other discourses were unable to bring about their hegemonic requirements. This led to rigidity of discursive elements. In this atmosphere, the discourse of political jurisprudential Islam collects other micro discourses under the flag of the Islamic revolutionary one through applying two elements: subjectivity and Imam Khomeini’s leadership. The discourse of political jurisprudential Islam was more available and its superiority was being capable to afford signifiers with its elements with people demands –in which other discourses were not successful.