به جمع مشترکان مگیران بپیوندید!

تنها با پرداخت 70 هزارتومان حق اشتراک سالانه به متن مقالات دسترسی داشته باشید و 100 مقاله را بدون هزینه دیگری دریافت کنید.

برای پرداخت حق اشتراک اگر عضو هستید وارد شوید در غیر این صورت حساب کاربری جدید ایجاد کنید

عضویت

فهرست مطالب raj s. chandran

  • Raj S. Chandran*, Arun Sathyababu, Sharmad Mohammed Haneefa, Rajmohan Bhanu Prabhakar
    Background and Aim

    Lumbar disc prolapse is a common cause of backache and radicular symptoms in lower limbs. Different surgical options have been described to compare the functional outcome, complications, and recurrence following surgery for lumbar disc prolapse by classical microlumbar discectomy (MLD) and minimally invasive tubular microdiscectomy. The advantages of one procedure over the other were also analyzed.

    Methods and Materials/Patients:

     A prospective, observational study conducted over a period of 1 year in the Department of Neurosurgery, Government Medical College Thiruvananthapuram, among patients who underwent surgical treatment for lumbar disc herniation by either microlumbar discectomy or minimally invasive surgery using a tubular retractor system. Ninety-nine patients who satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria were analyzed and tabulated for the outcome.

    Results

    The two groups did not show a statistical difference in terms of functional outcome, complications, or recurrence rate. However, the need for post-operative analgesics, blood loss, and hence hospitalization was less in the tubular discectomy group.

    Conclusion

    Both procedures are equally effective in terms of surgical results. However, the advantages and the subtle tendency of the patients to adopt “keyhole” make the tube an attractive option.

    Keywords: Disectomy, Lumbar, Tubular, Minimally invasive spine surgery}
  • Prakash Goswami, Raj S. Chandran*, Sharmad Mohammed Haneefa, Arun Sathyababu, Rajmohan Bhanu Prabhakar
    Background and Aim

    Adjacent segment disease (ASD), radiological and clinical, is observed in many of the patients who undergo cervical inter-body fusion with/without graft, and with/without plating. This study aims to evaluate the proportion of ASD among patients who underwent cervical spine fusion surgery, to study the severity of degenerative radiographic findings at adjacent levels, and to determine sites and patterns of ASD.

    Methods and Materials/Patients: 

    A descriptive study was performed on patients who underwent a previous cervical arthrodesis procedure in the last 2-5 years and continued follow-up as neurosurgery outpatients. A total of 59 patients who qualified for the inclusion criteria were included in the study.

    Results

    Spine fixation was commonly performed at a single level mostly with sample size (54.2%, n=32) then at two levels (42.4%, n=25) and three levels (3.4%, n=2). Adjacent segment degeneration was present in the spine fixation level subgroup at a single level of 9 cases (28.12%), two levels of 9 cases (36%), and three-level fixations of 2 cases (100%). Six patients (10.2%) out of 59 patients developed radiculopathy. Among twenty-two cases (37.3%) with new changes at adjacent levels, reduced disc height was the most common one (18.6%, n=11). Anterior and posterior osteophytes with reduced disc height were found in 2 cases. Therefore, actual new changes were present in 20 cases only. The most common level of C4-C5 was observed for the development of ASD (13.6%, n=8). ASD developed at cranial to fusion in 13 cases (22%), caudal to fusion in 5 cases (8.5%), and at both levels in 2 patients.

    Conclusion

    Adjacent segment disease was observed in a significant number of patients who underwent cervical spine surgery as evident from the results but only 6 out of 20 cases with radiological evidence of ASD were symptomatic. Changes were observed commonly at the C4/C5 level.

    Keywords: Adjacent, Cervical, Spine, Surgery}
بدانید!
  • در این صفحه نام مورد نظر در اسامی نویسندگان مقالات جستجو می‌شود. ممکن است نتایج شامل مطالب نویسندگان هم نام و حتی در رشته‌های مختلف باشد.
  • همه مقالات ترجمه فارسی یا انگلیسی ندارند پس ممکن است مقالاتی باشند که نام نویسنده مورد نظر شما به صورت معادل فارسی یا انگلیسی آن درج شده باشد. در صفحه جستجوی پیشرفته می‌توانید همزمان نام فارسی و انگلیسی نویسنده را درج نمایید.
  • در صورتی که می‌خواهید جستجو را با شرایط متفاوت تکرار کنید به صفحه جستجوی پیشرفته مطالب نشریات مراجعه کنید.
درخواست پشتیبانی - گزارش اشکال