فهرست مطالب salimeh latifi jaliseh

Conflicts between work and family wants are inevitable in organizations and families. This, in turn, creates psychological problems in people's personal and working life. The aim of this study is to present a model of work-family conflict management among employees of Iran University of Medical Sciences during COVID-19 pandemic.

This was a qualitative study conducted in 2021. The statistical population of the research included 14 thematic and executive experts who were selected with judgmental-purposive method. The analytical model of the research was deductive-inductive and based on the qualitative method of thematic analysis. Data were collected by document method and through in-depth and semi-structured interviews with experts of Iran University of Medical Sciences. The content validity of the research model was 85%. Retest reliability was 70% and coder reliability was 87%.

After five stages of content analysis, 67 basic themes, 7 comprehensive themes (family stress stimulus (3 themes), supportive job variables (11 themes), moderating variables (7 themes), stress management (12 themes), negative consequences (17 themes), positive outcomes (2 themes), work stress stimuli (15 themes)) were counted and added. Finally, a work-family for the staff of Iran University of Medical Sciences was designed.

According to the current research model, work-family conflict management in the period of COVID-19 requires a new way of working. It should be independent, flexible and compatible with individual conditions and preferences of employees more than before. Considering the importance of the negative consequences of work-family conflict, the vice-chancellor of management and resource development in the university can use the model presented in this research to prepare training programs needed by employees. He can also manage the negative consequences of work-family conflict and develop support and counseling programs needed by employees to be used during COVID-19 pandemic.

Governance in the health system is not just a vision, or a model for delivering services, but a key element in planning, implementing and evaluating activities to improve health. The main purpose of this study was to design a pattern for assessing Iran's Health System Governance.

The present study was descriptive in terms of purpose, qualitative in terms of application, and qualitative in terms of data type, which was conducted based on thematic analysis and deductive-inductive approach. 14 health system experts were selected through non-random-purposive sampling. To calculate reliability, test-retest reliability and coder reliability were used, which were 70 and 87 %, respectively. Also, Waltz and Basel method was used to assess the content validity of the extracted indices which was 85 %.

After 6 stages of thematic analysis, 137 basic themes, 15 organizing themes and 5 comprehensive themes (health system accountability, health system participation, health system policy formulation, health system service provision, health system efficiency and quality) were obtained, and finally, a model for assessing the governance of the health system in the Islamic Republic of Iran was designed. Organizational accountability included 7 themes, ethical accountability, 9, and legal accountability included 6 .Financial accountability included 8 basic themes, and efficiency and quality, 10 basic themes. Implementation included 8 themes, comprehensiveness, 4, reporting, 12, and transparency, 6. Structural policy included 23 themes, social inclusion and justice policy, 6, and fiscal policy included 11 basic themes. Medical services included 4 themes, financial services, 7, human services and human rights, 9, and information and technology services included 7 basic themes. In this pattern, participation and policy formulation were considered input, and accountability, efficiency and quality and service delivery were considered output.

Lack of a clear definition for an appropriate interdepartmental cooperation, Lack of meritocracy, having a guild oriented attitude, conflict of interests, not using a policymaking approach based on a collective evidence and wisdom are among the shortcomings of the current health system governance. In addition, healthcare costs imposed on people are too high.

The importance of speed, synergy, and efficiency in service delivery has made the network paradigm the dominant paradigm for many government agencies, including the health care system. The purpose of the present study is to present a model of network performance evaluation in network governance of the Ministry of Health and Medical Education.

This was a qualitative content analysis study. Semi-structured interviews with exploratory orientation were conducted with 14 experts from the Ministry of Health and Medical Education. These were selected by purposive sampling. Content validity of extracted themes was 0.90. Reliability between the two coders was 87%.

After six stages of content analysis, 52 basic themes and five organizing themes (competency development of 10 themes, effective planning of 7 themes, flexibility of structure and process of 13 themes, realization of goals of 12 themes, effective accountability of 11 themes, effective accountability of 11 themes). Network rule was designed.

In evaluating the performance of network governance, accountability and system stability are the most important factors. Health managers and policymakers can use the model provided in developing performance appraisal indicators.

In the present study, structural challenges in the governance system of the Ministry of Health, Treatment, and Medical Education of Iran were analyzed based on the network structure model.

The present qualitative study was conducted using a meta-combined approach. The study used the findings of 19 qualitative studies, conducted between 2001 and 2018, and semi-structured interviews with 14 non-randomly selected experts of the Iranian health system. The Kapa-Cohen index was used to calculate the reliability, which was 80%. Also, the Waltz-Basel method was used to assess the content validity of the extracted indices, which was calculated to be 85%. Through the content analysis of the articles and interviews with experts, the structural challenges of the governance system were classified into seven dimensions, including policy-making and decision-making challenges, legal challenges, organizational challenges, managerial challenges, communication challenges, financial challenges, and regulatory challenges.

The findings showed that important challenges in the current governance structure of the Ministry of Health, Treatment, and Medical Education of Iran include the instability of managers, inconsistent speed of policy-making and changes in society, the separated activity of the Health Deputy and Treatment Deputy of the Ministry, lack of defined inter-sectoral cooperation, lack of transparency, lacked knowledge of the requirements of collective decision-making in health policy-makers, the lacked use of evidence-based policy-making, inadequate budget system, and lack of control over the private sector.

According to the challenges and their importance, health policy-makers and planners must provide practical and applicable solutions to address the challenges of the current governance structure.

Network management is one of the elements to consider in network governance.Given the importance of network governance in facilitating and accelerating the functions of government agencies, including the health sector administrator, this study seeks to design a network resource management model in the Ministry of Health and Medical Education.The present study is a qualitative .Semi-structured interviews were conducted with exploratory orientation with 14 experts from the Ministry of Health and Medical Education. These were selected by purposive non-random sampling.

After six stages of content analysis, 67 organizer themes and 5 basic themes (competencies of 17 themes, 9 themes network resources, 12 themes network resources, 11 themes network information resources, 18 themes coordination and network decision making) Finally, a network resource management model was designed.

This model, while paying more attention to health policy makers and planners, can be used as a tool for human resource policy making.

This study deals with the direct and indirect relationship between knowledege management and innovation using meta-analysis approach . The purpose of this study based on goal is descriptive and type of use is applied. The study population included 41 dissertations, Thesis and Organizational Identity research that 14 sample selected using non-random purposefully method for meta-analysis. The identification reliability via the agreement of the Referees in selecting the researches and Their categorization, The Coding Reliability was obtained via The agreement of the Referee on the use of specific concepts to variables Coding and significance and Effect size Reliability was obtained via an Agreement on effect size calculation between two meta-analyzer. Findings showed that among 48 Effect size, 18 Effect size is high (higher 0.5), 17 Effect size is low, and 8 Effect size is medium. also result show that direct relationship between knowledege development ,knowledege sharing, use of knowledege, knowledege keeping have higherEffect size on innovation.

The purpose of this Study is to present a Model of policy Obstacles using the Meta Synthesis method. This research is descriptive -applied. The statistical population of this study consists of 140 articles policy related publications published between 2000 and 2017. 49 Articles were selected as samples via non-random-purposeful Sampling Method. Kappa Coefficient was used to Calculate the Reliability .The Amount of which was 0.798. Also The Waltz and Basel Methods was used to Measure the content validity, that Its value was Calculated 0.85 . By Analyzing the contents of these Articles, the Dimensions and patterns of the Model were Extracted and the Significance of each one was Determined by the Shannon Entropy Method. The Results of the Data Analysis Showed that the Barriers to Policy formulation, Policy Implementers, Managerial, Structural, Financial, Informational and Technological Resources and Environmental are the most important obstacles to Policy Implementation in Government Organization. Inadequate interaction and performance indicators, lack of the appropriate theoretical basis for policy, weak information technology, personal characteristics of executives, inadequate implementation tools, inadequate monitoring system, inadequate coordination of implementation are the most important factor .

The main objective of this applied research is evaluating the degree of ethic in petrochemical special economic zone organization. The method of the following research is Cross Sectional Descriptive-Survey. The main sampling population was 261 employees (Including managers and staff), the sample of this research was 200 that have been selected by the simple accidental sampling method. Questionnaire is the applied method of the data gathering. Cronbach’s Alfa of this study was 0.97. For analysis of data, the mentioned methods and soft wares have been used: Hierarchical Confirmatory Factor Analysis, one sample T-test and Friedman Test, Also; the SPSS and |Lisrel software. The conclusion has been made that an ethical organization should have three aspects of the moral individuals, leadership and structure. The measure of the ethics in the mentioned organization is less than the average.