فهرست مطالب samane rahmatifar

This research has been done to investigate the legitimacy and evolution process of the concept of government legitimacy by regional unions. Since the most obvious component of legitimacy is respect for human rights, on this basis, the government is evaluated based on the rights, discipline and security that it establishes for the people and by the people. So, nowadays the governments stablished based on illegal ways like coups, aggressions and ethnic and racial discrimination are facing the crisis of legitimacy to public opinion. Especially by formation of regional unions, the components of national legitimacy of governments have evolved.In order to carry out the research, the following question is raised: how have the components of national legitimacy of the government evolved in the procedure of regional unions and what impact has it had on modern international law? To answer this question the research method is comparative-descriptive and library-based. The result shows that not only the effective control of a government is not considered the basis of national legitimacy, but also democratic methods and tools in reaching power as well as the ability of national governments to establish stability in society based on respect for human rights and basic freedoms of citizens in the procedure of regional unions has been identified

Neoliberalism is among the thoughts on concepts such as the market, the abolition of rules, and the removal of the notion of public or community interest and replacing it with "individual responsibility." Neoliberalism can be considered an ideology that believes that free trade and investment are the sole source of economic development and prosperity. This idea is based on the principle that the market mechanism should govern the human destiny. The collision of neoliberalism and the second generation of human rights, based on the charles and abstract categories that are abstract and academic, are in the economy and the market. The rules that are classified in this generation are among the legal ones that, in terms of codification and legislature, coincide with the rules of the first generation, but its identification is philosophically and theoretically followed by civil and political rights. It is important for these rules and concepts to coincide with the emergence of the period of neoliberalism, partly due to the international system's desire to realize the justice of the economy, and consequently to reduce poverty and overcome the shortcomings and deprivations of mankind.

Among three branches of government, judiciary has the most important role in protecting of citizens’ rights; therefore upgrade and improvement of this branch is vital to promote human rights. If changes consider international standards and local concerns at the same time, be efficient, if not will be failed. Good governance is an international model has localization capability which its default is correct process leads to correct results. Current article tries to recognize indexes of general elements of good governance compatible to judicial procedures; then compares Iran’s judiciary system and indexes, especially in term of procedural rules; moreover suggests a frame for judicial reforms.