فهرست مطالب shahram bagheri-hariri

This study was conducted to evaluate the association of echocardiographic parameters used in left ventricular (LV) diastology with the early results of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) workup in the hospital. 

This cross-sectional study was performed on patients presenting with acute chest pain and a diagnosis of NSTE-ACS including only patients with unstable angina (UA) and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). All patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography in the emergency room (ER) within 12 hours of the last episode of chest pain. An invasive approach was not uniformly pursued in all of the patients so analysis was performed in two different settings. First, analysis was performed in the patients that underwent coronary angiography (CAG) and echocardiographic data were compared between those with normal and abnormal CAG results. Finally, echocardiographic data of the patients with normal diagnostic results (i.e., normal exercise tolerance test (ETT), myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) or coronary angiography (CAG) results) were compared with the data of the patients with abnormal test results. 

Eighty patients with a mean age of 54.43 ± 12.38 years were included in the study, of whom 57 (71.2%) were male. Fifty-three patients underwent CAG. In these 53 patients, there was significant difference in mitral annular velocity in early diastole (e’), ratio of mitral inflow velocity to e’ (E/e’), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) between patients with coronary artery involvement and those with normal coronary artery (P<0.05). The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to predict CAG results for e’, E/ e’, LVEDD and LVEDP was more than 0.65. The sensitivity and specificity of the LV diastolic dysfunction for predicting coronary involvement was 94.4% and 35.29%, respectively. Comparison of echocardiographic data between patients with normal test results (non-invasive and invasive) and those with abnormal diagnostic tests showed a significant difference in e’, E/e’, acceleration time of E, LV end-diastolic diameter index, size of interventricular septum and left atrial volume. 

The results suggest that diastolic dysfunction data can be used as an adjunctive method to evaluate ACS patients in the ER.

It is likely that high rate of healthcare workers (HCWs) infection has occurred in Iran, but there is not any proof yet. 

This study was conducted to highlight the rate of Iranian HCWs infected by COVID-19 and some of its surrounding points. 

This cross-sectional study was conducted in Tehran, Iran. Using web-based applications including WhatsApp, Telegram, Instagram and Facebook, the link to the questionnaire was sent and exposed to the eligible ones. The target population of the study was HCWs who were diagnosed as approved cases of COVID-19. They were asked about their baseline characteristics and also possible source of infection, symptoms onset, hospitalization and etc. All findings presented by frequency and percent. 

From March 29, 2020 to April 5, 2020, a total of 452 HCWs had completed the online questionnaire of whom 50.9% were women; mostly were in the age range of 25-29 years old. Among the participants, physicians had the largest population with 312 people (69.0%). The most frequent clinical symptoms were fatigue, fever and myalgia, respectively. The highest frequency with 85 cases (18.8%) was reported their symptoms onset within 20-24th February, 2020. The most commonly used piece of equipment was gloves, which was used in 57.3% of the cases, followed by simple surgical mask, which was used by 47.1% of the participants. In 21.9% cases no personal protective equipment was used. Totally, 348 cases (91.6%) were treated in an outpatient setting and only 36 cases (9.5%) needed to be hospitalized. In 160 cases (35.4%), at least one other person was infected with COVID-19 in their household. 

Considerable number of participants that declared their infection in this study, emphasizes on the considerable rate of Iranian HCWs infected by COVID-19.

There were numerous studies using acupuncture for pain relief and in most, the effect of this technique on preventing migraine attacks has been investigated. In those several studies that surveyed the effect of acupuncture on treatment of migraine headaches, the conclusion was not completely persuaded and they suggested further researches on this topic.

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of acupuncture on controlling acute migraine attacks.

This study was a single blinded randomized clinical trial that was conducted on patients with a diagnosis of acute migraine attacks. At the time of reference, the patient’s pain intensity was measured and recorded in a written checklist. Acupuncture was done in the intervention group with thin metallic needles, which enter certain points in the ear’s skin; including shen men, autonomic, thalamus, frontal, and temple. In the placebo group, similar needles were used, however, they were inserted into unusual points. Thereafter, in 30 minutes, one, two, and four hours after the treatment, the pain intensity was also asked and compared with the reference time’s score.

A total of 60 patients with the mean age of 31.4 ± 7.6 years were enrolled and 83.3% of them were women. There was no significant difference between two groups in terms of the baseline characteristics of participants including age, sex and pain duration before admission (P > 0.05). According to the results, there was a significant difference between the two groups on the checkpoints of 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after acupuncture (P < 0.05); however, the pain scores were not statistically different between the two groups on two, three, and four hours after intervention (P > 0.05).

Based on the findings of our study, although the pain score was lower in the intervention group than the control group during first hour after the acupuncture, there was no significant change in pain score thereafter. Comparison of the two groups showed no differences between acupuncture and placebo acupuncture on decreasing the mean pain score

A healthy 24-year-old female presented at the emergency department (ED) after a car accident with ambulance while injured severely after the bus got run over her lower limb. As the trauma team was activated, her primary survey was started: Ac (Airway and cervical collar): She was awake and could talk. Cervical collar was fixed, oxygenation with face mask was started. B (Breathing): Her chest rising was symmetrical without any laceration or abrasion. Chest auscultation was clear and there was no tenderness or crepitation on palpation. No tracheal shift was found. She had normal respiratory rate and O2 saturation of 94% at ambient air. C (Circulation): Two large bore IV lines were inserted and blood samples were obtained. Her vital signs were BP = 60/40 mmHg, PR = 130/min, RR = 12. E-FAST was performed which was negative for free fluid in abdomen, pelvis and thorax, tamponade, and hemopneumothorax. Her pelvis was unstable on examination and pelvic wrapping was performed with sheath. IV fluid therapy with normal saline was started followed by 3 units of packed RBC transfusion. More pack cells and FFP were also requested. D (Disability): She had Glasgow coma scale of 15/15 with normal size and reactive pupil. No neurologic deficit was found except disability of lower extremities due to crush injury. E (Exposure): She had no midline spinal tenderness with normal sphincter anal tone, but there was a laceration in the perineum which extended to the vagina. Portable chest and pelvic x-ray as an adjutant to primary survey were performed which showed type C pelvic fracture. On her secondary survey, she had abrasion on her scalp, 1.5 cm laceration on her right tibia, deformity of her right thigh, and laceration in her genitalia with some vaginal bleeding. Direct pressure was applied and all lacerations were packed. According to negative e-FAST and pelvic fracture and shock, since the angiography was not available, it was decided to fix the pelvis with external fixator in the operation room. After the fixation, and because shock persisted, operative pelvic packing was undertaken. Unfortunately, she suffered cardiorespiratory arrest in the operating room and died.

Emergency department (ED) is usually the first line of healthcare supply to patients in non-urgent to critical situations and, if necessary, provides hospital admission. A dynamic system to evaluate patients and allocate priorities is necessary. Such a structure that facilitates patients’ flow in the ED is termed triage.
This study was conducted to investigate the validity and reliability of implementation of Emergency Severity Index (ESI) system version 4 by triage nurses in an overcrowded referral hospital with more than 80000 patient admissions per year and an average emergency department occupancy rate of more than 80%.
This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital and trauma center with an emergency medicine residency program. Seven participating expert nurses were asked to assess the ESI level of patients in 30 written scenarios twice within a three-week interval to evaluate the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability. Patients were randomly selected to participate in the study, and the triage level assigned by the nurses was compared with that by the emergency physicians. Finally, based on the patients’ charts, an expert panel evaluated the validity of the triage level.
During the study period, 527 patients with mean age of 54 ± 7 years, including 253 (48%) women and 274 (52%) men, were assessed by seven trained triage nurses. The degree of retrograde agreement between the collaborated expert panel’s evaluation and the actual triage scales by the nurses and physicians for all 5 levels was excellent, with the Cohen’s weighted kappa being 0.966 (CI 0.985–0.946, p The study findings showed that there was perfect reliability and, overall, almost perfect validity for the triage performed by the studied nurses.

There are considerable rates of pediatrics trauma referring emergency department following a traumatic event. The worried parents are requesting for the most sensitive diagnostic test, so emergency physicians ask them to underwent brain computed tomography (CT) scan. Lower threshold of decision making regarding use of brain CT scan results in huge number of normal imaging. On the other hand, radiation exposer of the child may accompanied with lots of side effects in future. It may highlight a question that “how to reduce the numbers of unnecessary brain CT scan of traumatic pediatric patients?”

Holding simulation courses in medical education is becoming more and more popular. Simulation appliance in medical training has led to more effective learning and safer care for patients. Simulation can ameliorate our defects in clinical bed-side training in a busy environment like an Emergency department (ED). Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of simulation program on emergency medicine (EM) residents’ performance in critical actions
Methods and Materials: We implemented a mandatory simulation program in EM residency curriculum in 2014. Ten of the EM faculties, gathered voluntarily and they peer reviewed the critical elementary topics and wrote scenarios during 48 regular sessions. In this study, we designed the peer reviewed checklists containing critical actions and procedures specified for each scenario. All faculty member attending simulation courses, rated residents and fulfilled checklists in a Likert scale from 1 to 5 (very bad to very good). We evaluated residents’ performance through these checklists.
EM faculties’ evaluation showed that in general, residents had quite a good performance in taking critical actions and procedures (45.4%).
Simulation can effectively improve medical performance in ED.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is the development of computer systems which are capable of doing human intelligence tasks such as decision making and problem solving. AI-based tools have been used for predicting various factors in medicine including risk stratification, diagnosis and choice of treatment. AI can also be of considerable help in emergency departments, especially patients’ triage.
This study was undertaken to evaluate the application of AI in patients presenting with acute abdominal pain to estimate emergency severity index version 4 (ESI-4) score without the estimate of the required resources.
A mixed-model approach was used for predicting the ESI-4 score. Seventy percent of the patient cases were used for training the models and the remaining 30% for testing the accuracy of the models. During the training phase, patients were randomly selected and were given to systems for analysis. The output, which was the level of triage, was compared with the gold standard (emergency medicine physician). During the test phase of the study, another group of randomly selected patients were evaluated by the systems and the results were then compared with the gold standard.
Totally, 215 patients who were triaged by the emergency medicine specialist were enrolled in the study. Triage Levels 1 and 5 were omitted due to low number of cases. In triage Level 2, all systems showed fair level of prediction with Neural Network being the highest. In Level 3, all systems again showed fair level of prediction. However, in triage Level 4, decision tree was the only system with fair prediction.
The application of AI in triage of patients with acute abdominal pain resulted in a model with acceptable level of accuracy. The model works with optimized number of input variables for quick assessment.

BackgroundThis study performed to assess the efficacy of ultrasound in screening upper and lower extremities fractures in comparison with standard X-ray in pediatric trauma patients.
Materials and MethodsThis was a prospective diagnostic study conducted at the emergency department of Imam Khomeini Complex Hospital, Tehran, Iran. All patients with the age under 18-year-old admitted with limb trauma were first evaluated by attending emergency medicine physician using ultrasound and then underwent necessary X-rays. Thereafter, the ultrasound reports were compared with X-ray reports regarding measurement of its accuracy.
ResultsForty patients with the mean age of 9.47 ± 5.26 years (minimum of 2 and a maximum of 17 years) entered the study (75% were male). The average time of performing ultrasound in pediatric population is 3.99± 0.83 minutes which is statistically significant compared to X-ray, 16.12 ± 4.15 minutes (PConclusionIt is likely that ultrasound could be an accurate and time saving substitute for X-ray in screening for limb fractures in pediatric trauma patients admitted in emergency department.

Arterial blood gas (ABG) sampling is a painful procedure with no perfect technique for quelling the discomfort. An ideal local anesthesia should be rapid, easy to learn, inexpensive, and noninvasive. This study was aimed to compare pain levels from ABG sampling performed with vapocoolant spray in comparison to placebo. We hypothesized that pretreatment with the vapocoolant would reduce the pain of arterial puncture by at least 1 point on a 10 point verbal numeric scale. We have evaluated the effectiveness of a vapocoolant spray in achieving satisfactory pain control in patients undergoing ABG sampling in this randomized placebo controlled trial. Eighty patients were randomized to 2 groups: group A, who received vapocoolant spray, and group B, who received water spray as placebo (Control group). Puncture and spray application pain was assessed with numerical rating scale (0, the absence of pain; 10, greatest imaginable pain) and number of attempts was recorded. The pain score during ABG sampling was not lower in group A compared with group B significantly (4.78±1.761 vs. 4.90±1.837; P:0.945). This study showed that while the spray exerts more application pain, the number of attempts required for ABG sampling was not significantly lower in group A compared with group B (1.38±0.54 vs. 1.53±0.68; P=0.372). Vapocoolant spray was not effective in ABG pain reduction, had milder application pain compared to placebo (P