فهرست مطالب zahra ahmadipoor

Interactions among power, politics and space are foundation of the geopolitics science Environmental perception of Power centers and decision-making processes affect these changes. On this basis, in management mentality process, Media in Giving shape and meaning of the Environmental Perception, decision-making processes, Power structure, nation - state relations (in the field of Legality and legitimacy) issues have important role. Implications of this facts, shows the reality of latency power in the community Lower layers. These Changes in the political geography literature is called Public geopolitics Today, Public geopolitics, have connected Appearance the new Social Movement that somehow represents the collective action to achieve common interests and good condition with Working with New Media, Social Network, Incompetence and totalitarian political system. Over the past year, Middle East and North Africa Changes “Arab Spring “Many Arab governments have been overthrown but can not be in the form of traditional literature to the analysis of these Changes. Thus, this paper seeks to answer the question that what lead to the occurrence of social movements and power structures of the Middle East and North Africa? In response, we have made the assumption the assumption that new media in social networks as a geopolitical variable have been active in the emergence and persistence of these Changes

The peace and looking for ways to keep it have been one of the most essential obsessions of the human beings throughout the history. Creation of regional or international organizations is considered as a way to peace building and keeping. In fact, one of the causes of transformation of international organization after the Cold War has been settlement of peace and security. The role of international organizations in order to settle conflicts is more vital and important, because most of these organizations have the ability and legitimacy to play an important role in this regard. In this regard, this article using descriptive- analytic method is intended to investigate the question: “why after the Cold War we have witnessed lower conflicts and tensions in the South East Asia than Middle East, Central Asia, Caucasus and Africa?” Research findings show that ASEAN has had an effective role in peace building and peace keeping through creating norms and regimes of peaceful settlement of disputes and strengthening interdependency, and even it has been successful to make a security community.

Following the collapse of the Soviet Union, due to changes in the structure of global system and political geography of the region, a new geopolitical situation was created in the region. On one hand, with the emergence of the newly independent countries of the Soviet Union, around the sea, the political geography of the region has changed and consequently, a new form of geopolitical relations was created in the region. On the other hand, the collapse of the Soviet Union, led to the United States increase its efforts for dominating the areas of Soviet influence.In order to influence and eventually dominate the region, extensive efforts of trans-regional powers was made, particularly by the United States of America as well as the actions of coastal and regional powers to get their interests in the Caspian and prevent the formation of a unipolar system that is led by America; made a space of competition in the Caspian region. The main question of the research is that, what space is created by the competitions in the Caspian region.This research with library and survey method and approach of Cross – sectional is Seeks toachieve a competition powers model in the Caspian region.

Geographical space the product is function of many factors، and in which the functioning of policies an entity official institutions and index of means government and thus state great influence on the quality of its formation from the perspective of spatial justice. This is why that a proper understanding of the field spatial justice depends on understanding the interrelationship between politics and space. geographical or spatial justice is the relative equality of comprehensive development indexes (Economic، Infrastructural، political، cultural، social، security and health care) in the geographical places and spaces (micro and macro) of a country with indexes corresponding with development at the national level. Since the construction affair space requires design a model for sensing the amount it is the realization of years as well as changes، and a review of the literature up to today quantitative model and comprehensive is not designed to measure the spatial justice. Accordingly، the main issue of the study the operational model designed sensing spatial justice that it is a case study in Iran. This paper whit describes and analytically methods and whit practical - developed approach in response to the following question: Is can whit a model was able to achieve، continuously sensing spatial justice in the country? The results shows that whit to consider Positive and negative roles of the eight factors and their related indicators can be achieved on Computer software sensing a continuous spatial justice in countries

Each place and space have not any identity without their settled population. There is an exact relation between inhabited human groups in a territory and the development process as the trend, direction and rate of them are depended on the quantity and quality of the population and because they have a direct relation to the geopolitics weight of the country, after measuring the population variable in the national power of a country, it is possible to define the role of this factor in the geopolitics weight of the country. This study examines the role of population in the geopolitical weight of Iran. The research method is descriptive-analytical and aimed to study the role of the population variable in the geopolitics weight of Iran. The data collection was based on the library and field work. The results of the research shows that now days Iran in terms of national power in the world in comparison to its total population is considered one of the intermediate states. However, today the only population cannot indicate the national power. In spite of its relative developing trend, Iran population generally has not a balanced condition in a lot of the qualitative indicators such the political culture of people, geographical distribution, population homogeneity or heterogeneity.