جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « اصالت جنگ » در نشریات گروه « علوم انسانی »

Judging between the originality of peace or war is one of the most thought-provoking issues in Islamic political thought. However, proving the originality of peace in political jurisprudence is more sensitive. Imami jurisprudence has usually dealt with the issues of war and peace against the infidels, and has not spoken comprehensively and independently about the People of Qibla (Muslims). The main question of the present study is: "In the face of various Islamic groups, including insurgents, rioters and opponents, is the originality of peace preferred or the originality of war or none? The most important fruit of the establishment of the principle of peace is to explain the ruling of suspicious cases in disputes between the People of Qibla. The hypothesis of this research is that by examining the opinions of the early and late Imami jurists, and considering the fixed jurisprudential principles in their view, the originality of peace with the people of Qibla can be accepted as a general principle in all disputes. The present article has explained the originality of peace by describing and analyzing the research findings based on Imami jurisprudential sources.

War exists with human beings and merged with human lif. Throughout history, there have been many schools of thought that have tried to eliminate war or to curtail it. Some schools praised the war. Islam can not be indifferent to this important issue as a religion which is a comprehensive and complete plan for humanitarian life. The question of this article is: What is the purpose of Islam from war? and What is the purpose of other religions in the war. It seems that the difference between the view of Islam and other schools and religions is more in the purpose of the war. To measure this hypothesis, we try to compare the purpose of the war in Islam with other religions. Our research method will be a comparative method. The findings of the article are that Islam and other religions do not coincide in the ultimate goal of the war. Therefore, the difference in purpose also has different functions in how to fight. Key words: war, Islam, necessity of war, originality of war, Christianity, liberalism

Having established his government, the messenger of God faced new difficulties of which is his manner of confronting non-Muslims. Three ways have been presented in the field including priority of war, priority of peace and regarding both war and peace each in its appropriate place. On the last, the first would lead to inordinacy and the second to submission. In this way, the only reasonable peace is the one based upon justice and honorability. It sees war necessary in the cases of sedition and injustice. The manner of the Prophet confirms this view with full clearness. All his wars have been defensive and all his payments with non-Muslims and his suggestion of peace to polytheists in the war badr signifies the view.