جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "جواد طباطبایی" در نشریات گروه "علوم انسانی"

The most fundamental question that has occupied the minds of Iranian-Islamic thinkers since the confrontation of Iranian-Islamic civilization with modern Western civilization is the possibility or impossibility of secularism and the separation of religion from politics in Islamic societies. This study examines the ideas of Abdolkarim Soroush and Javad Tabatabai who have studied and written in this field. In this regard, using the theory of constructivism, which allows us to study the transtheoretical principles and epistemological backgrounds of thinkers, we show that Soroush's loyalty to the school of Kant and his epistemologists led to the adaptation of humanities to natural sciences, which led to falsification. And jurisprudence has been denied, and then Javad Tabatabai's Hegelian background on the necessity of dialogue between Iranian-Islamic civilization and modern Western civilization is explained, which will eventually lead to the emergence of a synthesis that is the new Iranian-Islamic civilization. The logical conclusion of Soroush's theory is the transition from tradition and jurisprudence to the acceptance of secularism and modern imported concepts without resistance to it, but in contrast to Tabatabai's theory, as modernity is original, tradition is original and the main manifestation of tradition is jurisprudence and sharia A window of conversation with the modern world is offered. Finally, using the interactive nature of the theory of "constructivism" in the conclusion of the study, the reasons for the superiority of Javad Tabatabai's views in analyzing the current situation and the impossibility of secularism in the Iranian-Islamic society will come.

This article seeks to show how the viewpoint of German politics in contemporary Iranian intellectual controversies, in particular the intellectual system of Javad Tabatabai, provides a perspective for Iran's problematic explanation, or in other words, the crisis of Iranian identity using theoretical and conceptual tools. Accordingly, the paper seeks to answer the question of how the knowledge of German politics has been used in Tabatabai's theoretical model to think of what he calls "Iranian problematic". The present paper argues that the knowledge of German politics from Hegel to Schmit was based on an idea of identity crisis based on the construction of a national state and at the same time providing a solution to the crisis. Based on such an approach, Javad Tabatabai, with a generalization of the 19th and 20th century German experience to present-day Iran, views the crisis of Iranian identity as a failure to understand Iran and the inadequacy of intellectual ideologies in this regard and to resolve this crisis at the expense of national –stable state. In Tabatabai's philosophy of politics, Iran's problematics is explained by German thought in the form of two main propositions of the Iranian city and the necessity of establishing a national university. On this basis, we will first briefly discuss how German thought faded and then referred to the nature of such influence. methodological point of view, the present paper has been complied Skinner's hermeneutical conceptual possibilities with a critical and normative approach.

This paper is a review of JavadTabatabee's book titled A Consideration on the Translation of Modern Political Thought' Texts: A Case Study of Machiavell's Prince. In this book Tabatabaee argues that two main factors of unreliable translation in the field of political philosophy are translator's artistic playing with words and his lack of knowledge about current and important interpretations of major works of political philosophy. In this paper we argue that Tabatabaee's claims are for the most part plausible. Nevertheless it seems that Tabatabaee ignores another important factor responsible for unreliable translations, i.e.translator's alteration of literal translation of philosopher's text by virtue of his assurance that he has a sufficient understanding of philosopher's meaning. Therefore we try to argue that even if we observe two main conditions of good translation mentioned by Tabatabaee, this will not necessarily lead to a reliable translation. Thus in addition to Tabatabaee's two main conditions, translator also must observe the literal approach in translating philosophical texts.

The present paper is a review and critique on Javad Tabatabai’s theory, “Decline of Iran”, via the classification system of theories based on Saussure’s binary oppositions. The system of classification is based on three binary oppositions that are nation and state, internal factors and external factors as well as the subjective and objective approach. By using the descriptive-analytic methodology, the paper shows that Tabatabai’s theory is a subjective- internal- nation-based. Although the theory emphasized on the internal factors but in fact the reason of decline of Iran seems to be related to the Seljuqs Turks and Mongols invasions. These are the reasons for ruling of prejudice that caused the losing of balance between reason and religion as well as the decline of rationality. The failure of his theory is its subjective approach and denial of objective approach in analyzing the subject. Although Tabatabai’s theory is a serious conceptual theory, there are some inner contradictions, putting emphasize on external factors with an objective approach as well as neglecting of social realities; so, it is not able to explain Iran historical backwardness.