جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « دیپلماسی اجبار » در نشریات گروه « علوم انسانی »

The Islamic Republic of Iran, as an actor that has challenged the hegemony of the United States and the ruling system of international relations and is a serious and active critic of the oppressive and unjust relations ruling the world, is always one of the strategic and main goals of the United States in combined war and coercive diplomacy. It has been in the field of foreign policy that with different methods and tools such as arms embargo, political pressure, economic embargo and efforts to isolate and narrow the circle of encirclement of the Islamic Revolution, it has demanded the submission of the Islamic Republic and following American regional and global policies. has been Considering that along with the conventional and unconventional means of combined warfare, including economic war, information war, political war, cultural war, psychological operations, cyber attacks, insecurity and internal destabilization, "diplomacy" and "diplomatic war" are also one of the The main and important axes of this type of combined war, this article seeks to investigate and analyze the nature and dimensions of combined war of America against the Islamic Republic according to the narrative of diplomacy and negotiation.

This study is to "evaluate the impact of Iranian strategic culture on Tehran's response to Washington's coercive diplomacy. The question is, "How has the strategic culture of Iran affected its response to Washington's wills i.e. giving up the ideals of the Islamic Revolution. The findings of the study, obtained through an inferential methodology and analyzed relying on the power of individual understanding, show that the nine components of Iranian strategic culture in regard of diplomacy and defense, including "martyrdom", "resistance", "emphasis on deterrence", tactical flexibility, "Strategic ambiguity", "strategic patience", "self-reliance", "strategic loneliness and a sense of vulnerability" and "the mission of the leadership of Islam and the region" and its 5 characteristics including "achieving the truth of trust", "courage" , "rationalism", "intelligent and thoughtful leadership" and "hybrid and multidimensional nature has led Iran to understand the extravagant and self-reinforcing nature of coercive diplomacy and the importance of resisting US pressure and to prevent an onset for the domino of being blackmailed by US. Thus, the interactions between Iran and US during the past four decades have been based on either the principle of "privilege for privilege" or "reciprocity."

Iran's tendency to create a regional map has led to the expansion of Iran's influence and increased geopolitical power due to elements such as the country's geopolitical situation and the adoption of a strategy to activate foreign non-state actors as regional arms. These reasons have created a growing sense of threat among the Persian Gulf states and Israel (as key US allies) and the need for convergence among them. In this study, we sought to answer the question of how and to what extent US sanctions have been able to affect Iran's domestic situation and regional approach. By continuing the strategy of " Containment" Iran and using " Coercive Diplomacy", the United States is trying to keep Iran in a kind of political-economic and geopolitical siege by smartening sanctions and maintaining and effectively regulating them, and the possibility of growth and foreign investment in Iran's economy to prevent. The consequences of imposing sanctions have weakened economic power and intensified the challenge of political-economic management inside Iran, and consequently, reduced the ability of Iran to support its proxy network as the main factor in the geopolitical realm of this country.

With the coming to power of Donald Trump in the United States, he takes a different approach to the level of extremist action on various global and regional issues, which has created security threats for various actors. This new attitude has also influenced Iran as the main focus of developments in the Middle East. Trump administration pursues step-by-step confrontation with Iran on security issues in the Middle East. The plan to create an Arab NATO is also at the heart of Trump's Middle East policy and forms the purpose of this article. In this regard, the main question in this article is, "What are the goals of the Trump administration in the Middle East and what obstacles will it face?" In response to this fundamental question, the paper's hypothesis is formulated that “the goal of forming an Arab NATO appears to be to limit Iran's regional influence and to create an Arab-Islamic bloc with the presence of Israel and even the United States." The findings show that the main obstacles to the Arab NATO plan are the Qatar crisis and the internal divisions of the Arab countries over regional issues, the weakening of Saudi Arabia's position in the West, the differences in regional readings of terrorism, and the divide in the Arab world over how to confront it. Iran and the intensification of Shiite-Sunni religious conflicts and divisions in the Middle East.

The ties between the U.S and Iran in the decades after the Islamic Revolution of Iran was on the pattern of conflict and divergence. Therefore, it can be said that Ideological conflict was the base and the main factor behind this meme. Over the years the U.S has tried to use various pretexts to deal with the Islamic Republic of Iran. During the past decade, Iran's nuclear program was an excuse for its conflict behavior, and in this regard coercive diplomacy has been the main U.S policy toward Iran.This study was an attempt to review the U.S coercive diplomacy against Iran's nuclear program. The main question is that what are the tools used by the U.S in its coercive diplomacy towards Iran's nuclear program, and what are the effects of this diplomacy on Iran's nuclear activities. To answer this question it was hypothesized that economic sanctions and military threats are the main tools for the U.S coercive diplomacy towards Iran's nuclear activities. Moreover, the U.S was able to use this tools to impose significant limitations on Iran's nuclear program. The research methodology was case study in which documents and library studies were used to collect the data.