جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « فرآیند تحلیل سلسله مراتبی » در نشریات گروه « علوم انسانی »

on the agenda of crisis management of Tabriz. One of the things to consider before constructing these databases is study and select a suitable location for the establishment of this type of use.In this study, a multi-location site of crisis management has been studied in Regions 4 and 10 of Tabriz Municipality. In the first instance, was paid to identify and analyze factors influencing site's Site selection. Raster maps were obtained after collection and preparation of the layers, and then weighting parameters was performed using the AHP in software Expertchoice. Next, the information layer, integrated with each other, based on fuzzy models, and finally combining the results of this stage, the options as desired location, were introduced, among their southern part of the four, was identified as the preferred option. Due to the geographic information system, in solving complex urban issues, and facilitate spatial analysis, has been applied, from ability of this system to prepare, integrate and analyze of layers.as a result of this extraction,bakhsh,south of the 4 region,has the address of a garden, which indicates the appointment of a suitable monthly residential property,such as sabz, amuzshi, warzahi, and … appropriate domestic policies and conditions this is priority to buy for the stability of this water.i am going to the place of my neighbourhood,and iam connected to it, park Hai Amir Kabir.

Various services which are provided by nature for humans are called ecosystem services. Planning and managing for optimal productivity of the land ecosystem services is done with help of knowing the land suitability. One of the types of ecosystem services is called ecosystem cultural services and ecotourism is included in this category. The purpose of this research is zoning land suitability for the ecotourism ecosystem service in Ghoochan city. The research method is based on multi-criteria decision making. After identifying the effective environmental criteria in zoning (height, slope, aspect, geology, soil, distance from the river, land use, distance from the road and distance from the settlement), the desired layers are entered into the ArcMap software, then the AHP method was applied to evaluate relative importance among all the criteria and the normalization of the layers was done with Fuzzy logic. Finally, by overlapping and combining all the layers, excellent, medium and weak areas for the ecotourism activities in the city were determined. The findings show that 31% of the studied area is in the high class and 47% in the medium class in terms of ecological capacity to provide eco-tourism ecosystem service, which indicates the significant capacity of the region for ecotourism planning. It has made possible the sustainable productivity on areas with the high potential to promote the economy of the local people while preserving the environment.

By going through the process of the past wars, we realize the fact that over time there have been drastic changes in the way of wars and we are witnessing the complexity and intelligence of wars. Different. It has been that by using the simultaneous and coordinated combination of people, national and supranational power in order to increase in the society with the aim of its sensitivities is trying to overthrow the government. For this reason, vigilance in front of the enemies is one of the system's duties. Therefore, the main purpose of the article is to answer the question, "What are the important components and indicators of the hybrid war against the Islamic Republic of Iran?" is the face A library of hope with the tools of determining these two methods and also by using the design of two questionnaires, which firstly specified the components and indicators of hybrid warfare in a general way, and then the important components and indicators used by the United States against the Islamic Republic of Iran from the second questionnaire. it's been chosen. In the next step, using the hierarchical analysis method, which is one of the most widely used research methods in operations, the importance of each of these indicators and components was obtained based on the opinions of experts and the target community. The findings and results of the research are to state that 10 components and 42 indicators have been selected as the most important components and indicators of hybrid warfare using Azromware as a pairwise comparison. The results obtained from this research are presented for the use of officials in order to target the enemy's hybrid warfare

The purpose of this study is to identify and prioritize the determinants of preventive supervision in public section audit using structural equations and process of hierarchical analysis.. this research is a type of applied research. the determinants of audit preventive supervision model in the public sector have been based on data method of the foundation and interview of 18 elites, which is finally 18 categories. data were collected through questionnaire. due to unlimited statistical population, the formula of Cochlear, which is 384, was used. results of the qualitative section of study resulted in identification of 18 main categories and 92 sub-categories which is in form of a paradigm model including phenomenon of phenomena (Legal bottlenecks, In the form of a paradigm model including phenomenal issues, contextual factors (organizational planning, institutional context, legal requirements), interventionist conditions (supervisory, specialized and human measures), strategies (financial supervision, legal context and organizational strategy), and consequences (supervisory effectiveness, financial effectiveness and environmental effectiveness). in quality part of relationship, these categories were evaluated that findings of study showed that causal factors had a positive and significant effect on the central phenomenon. the findings also showed that phenomenal phenomena, underlying and interventional factors have a significant positive and significant impact on strategic factors. in addition, findings showed that strategic factors have a positive and significant impact on consequences.

Data as a strategic asset in any organization requires proper and effective management in order to provide transformative opportunities for the organization. In addition, the increase in the volume of data has forced organizations to move towards collecting, classifying and analyzing data so that they can identify the customer's needs and respond to them at the right time and in the right way. On the one hand, to manage such a volume of data and on the other hand, to maximize the business value resulting from the analyses based on these data, a concept called data governance has been introduced. Data governance is a system for determining the responsibilities, policies and standards used in connection with data-driven processes at the organization level, which tries to take steps to transform organization's data into business values while maintaining and increasing the quality of data. From this point of view, data governance is considered as a strategic program that aims to guide and monitor the various data dimensions of the organization in order to solve internal problems around data, and to improve collaboration between business and information technology departments. It will lead to increase productivity in data management and use, and help generate value by pushing the organization towards data-driven decisions. Considering the importance and role of data governance, organizations need to have a clear picture of their situation in this field. Therefore, the need for an approach that can evaluate data governance in organizations is strongly felt. For this purpose, this research tries to find an answer to this need by developing a model for evaluating data governance.

In this research, first, a set of criteria for evaluating data governance is extracted from the literature, and according to the structure of the problem and the opinion of experts, a hierarchical structure is developed for evaluating data governance. Then the evaluation method is established using the proposed structure and a hybrid approach based on Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). In the following, the proposed approach is used in a case study in the food industry.In the evaluation method, first, the weight of each criterion is calculated with the help of AHP. In this regard, the following steps are taken.

Form a hierarchy:

For the elements of each level of the hierarchy, perform pairwise comparisons according to the expert opinion.Calculate the inconsistency rate for each matrix of pairwise comparisons.If the inconsistency rate for the matrix was more than 0.1, review the values of the paired comparisons of that matrix.Calculate the relative weight of the elements corresponding to each matrix of pairwise comparisons.The product of the relative weight of each criterion and the relative weight of all elements related to it, at all higher levels of the hierarchy, gives the final weight of that criterion.Now, with the help of the weights calculated for each criterion and using the TOPSIS method, the alternatives will be ranked. The TOPSIS method is based on choosing the alternative that has the smallest distance from the positive ideal solution and the largest distancefrom the negative ideal solution. In this method, it is assumed that there are m alternatives (organizations) that must be evaluated based on n criteria. The steps of this method are as follows.Evaluate the alternatives with respect to each criterion according to the expert opinion.Normalize the decision matrix so that the data are on the same scale.Obtain the normalized weighted decision matrix by multiplying each component of the normal matrix by the weight of similar criteria.Calculate positive ideal and negative ideal solutions.Calculate the distance of each alternative from the ideal positive and ideal negative solutions.Obtain the closeness coefficient of the alternatives.Rank the alternatives in decreasing order of the closeness coefficient.Finally, the proposed evaluation method is used to evaluate data governance in five organizations active in the food industry.

According to the results of this research, data governance can be evaluated at the first level from three different dimensions, which are data quality, internal organizational effects, and external organizational effects. Then, at the second level, different criteria are considered for each dimension of data governance. Data quality evaluation criteria include data accuracy, data completeness, data consistency, data availability, data timeliness, and data uniqueness. The data accuracy measure refers to issues such as the percentage of incorrect information, the percentage of the need for manual corrective actions on the data, and the percentage of change in the retrieval of incorrect information after the implementation of data governance. The data completeness criterion seeks to ensure the completeness of various dimensions of information that the organization must use in its business line, and is related to issues such as the percentage of information filled in the required fields, the percentage of usable information, and the percentage of incomplete information. Dataconsistency refers to ensuring that the data is consistent and aligned with the policies, rules and values set for the data in the business. Data availability seeks to assess the time the business group has access to critical information and data elements.Data timeliness refers to the degree to which the data represents reality at a particular point in time.Data uniqueness means that no information item is recorded more than once in the data set.The second dimension of data governance evaluation focuses on its internal organizational effects,andthe main criteria in this dimension are data governance efficiency, data governance productivity, and business cost savings. These criteria seek to evaluate the level of involvement, participation and impact of data governance in the organization. Among the important things in evaluating the efficiency of data governance are the number of business lines, functional areas, system areas, project teams, and other parts of the organization that have come together to support monitoring and providing resources for data governance, and in addition, categorizing and tracking the status of all issues that fall within the scope of data governance tasks. The data governance productivity considers the impact of data governance in relation to the amount of support and investment in this area, and includes issues such as the amount of reduction in resources required to coordinate members, products and other entities in data systems, the amount of reduction in work required to solve existing data problems, the percentage of projects or initiatives within the organization that have been identified and eliminated as redundant by the data governance program, and the number of redundant systems eliminated in order to create a single definition of customer, product, or other master data. Finally, the cost savings measure reflects the business value of data governance in terms of internal organizational impacts.The third dimension of data governance evaluation considers the effects that go beyond the internal boundaries of the organization and affect the entire business of the organization. The criteria considered in this dimension include obtaining and improving customer satisfaction, complying with laws and creating business opportunities, which express the main motivations and drivers of the organization to adopt data governance in the current competitive environment. The customer satisfaction criterion measures the fruit of the efforts made to govern and manage data and turn it into a real business value. On the other hand, there are laws and regulations that are defined in relation to data and depending on the type of business at different national, regional and international levels, and failure to comply with them, in addition to monetary fines, will sometimes result in the suspension or even termination of the organization's business. Therefore, the level of compliance with laws is one of the key criteria in the evaluation of data governance from the perspective of external organizational effects. Finally, it is expected that high-quality data along with analysis and reporting systems will lead to informed decisions and data-driven insights and provide new business opportunities for the organization, which is the subject of the last criterion in this dimension.Finally, five organizations active in the food industry were examined from the perspective of data governance. According to the information collected from these organizations and using expert opinion, pairwise comparisons were made at different levels of the proposed hierarchy. Then, using AHP, the weight of each dimension and criteria was calculated. According to the results, it can be seen that the external organizational effects is the most important dimension of data governance evaluation in organizations. In addition, customer satisfaction was chosen as the most important evaluation criterion, and compliance with laws and productivity were placed in the next positions. Then, the solutions and the distance of each organization from these solutions were calculated. studied organizations were scored based on the data governance criteria on a scale between zero and ten, and using the TOPSIS method, ideal positive and ideal negative  Afterwards, the closeness coefficient and accordingly the rank of each organization was obtained.The results show that the third organization has the best performance in the field of data governance among other organizations, andthe second and fourth or ganizations are placed in the next places with a slight difference from each other.The fifth organization has a much weaker performance and the first organization is in the last place by a large margin. These results emphasize the applicability of the proposed approach for evaluating data governance and show the steps to perform such an evaluation in a case study in the field of food industry. Such an evaluation in the target organizations can be used as a measure to determine the current state of data governance on the one hand, and on the other hand, it can be used to set goals to reach the desired state in data governance. Moreover, considering the comprehensive and general nature of the proposed approach, it enables its application in other organizations, regardless of their size and type, which is one of the advantages of this approach.

The volume of data is exploding in the last decade and its complexity is continuously increasing. Moreover, organizations have become more adept at using data, which has created new demands that require different methods to combine, change, store and present information. Leading organizations are finding that traditional solutions for data management are becoming more expensive and unable to truly manage the business. Therefore, organizations need to solve these data problems in another way and by implementing an effective data governance. Data governance, by monitoring data quality and aligning it with business goals, is one of the causes of internal organizational changes, such as increased productivity. It has external impacts like increasing customer satisfaction and creating new business opportunities. Therefore, organizations need to use, implement, and evaluate data governance in their business to maintain competitive advantage and comply with laws and regulations. The present study tried to provide an applicable approach to evaluate data governance in organizations. For this purpose, the dimensions of data governance and different criteria for their evaluation were determined using the literature review and the opinion of experts. Then, a hierarchical structure was proposed to evaluate data governance. This structure considers data governance from the three dimensions of data quality, internal organizational effects and external organizational effects of data governance. In the following, for each of these dimensions and depending on their nature, different criteria were introduced and explained. Then the evaluation method was developed based on the obtained structure and using a hybrid AHP and TOPSIS approach. In the next step, the proposed approach was used in a case study to evaluate data governance in five organizations active in the food industry. This study, while showing the implementation steps of the proposed approach, specifies its applicability and generalizability in other organizations. In addition, the results of this evaluation can help organizations to improve the state of data governance and while ensuring customer satisfaction and compliance with laws in the field of data, provide a platform for organizational excellence and new business opportunities.

The objective of this research is comparing of relative efficiency of main ports in Iran and identifying efficient ports and also determining the most efficient port between them. The method of this research is descriptive and applied research and statistical society is consist of eleven important ports in Iran. Method of data analysis is in accordance with Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) method. The importance of this research is that, ports by knowing rate of their efficiency will try to increase strength and decrease their weakness to become as a model in a competitive environment. In this method, at first, by using of Analytical-Hierarchy-Process (AHP) method we calculate normal matrix and attribute average for each port and then, find normal matrix of input and output data of ports. The DEA (BCC, CCR) method is used for determining coefficient of efficiency of ports and finding out efficient and non-efficient ports and finally, for determining the most efficient port it is used the Anderson-Peterson method(AP). The Lingo software is used for calculation and analyzing of models. The results of this research indicate that between eleven ports, 6 efficient ports and 5 non-efficient ports are recognized and the port of Shahid Rajaee is the most efficient port amongst them

A road map shows the layout of existing or possible routes and roads in a specific geographical location. A strategic roadmap is a visual tool of what the organization needs to do to succeed in achieving its long-term goals. Roadmap is a method of process planning in the form of step-by-step and layer-by-layer in the context of time and oriented towards the future. This research seeks to identify and prioritize effective criteria and strategies on the road map of defense logistics research centers.

 This Research is practical ,exploratory and quantitative in terms of purpose, nature ,method& type of data. The statistical population includes experts in the field of strategic management and roadmap. Identification and prioritization of strategies and criteria was done by 12 experts who were selected as snowballs. The method of data collection was in the form of library, field, and the use of experts' opinion and collection tools were researcher-made questionnaires. Validity and reliability of the questionnaire were checked and confirmed through face validity and inconsistency rate, respectively. The softwares used are Excel and the software of expert choice.

The most important criterion of the roadmap of research centers is human capital; The most important strategy is the strategy of applying and implementing research findings and specialized knowledge in the units; And the most important selected criterion is financial resources.

Based on the results of priority criteria, strategies and relative and overall priority of strategies and guidelines and suggestions, it is possible to compile and present the road map of defense logistics research centers.

The aim of the present study was to rank the financing methods of small and medium companies. From the AHP-TOPSIS approach, the factors influencing the choice of financing method should be identified and prioritized. The research data were collected using a questionnaire and a sample of research from the financial managers of small and medium companies. Were also identified and defined in seven groups. The results show that the profit criterion is superior to other criteria and the financial method of factoring is preferred. Of course, the situation of companies and financial managers at the time of decision-making has a significant impact on the choice of different methods.

With the growth of population and urbanization, the urban managers are concerned with optimal waste management besides problems such as traffics, various types of pollutions, slums, etc. Nowadays the development of cities, growth of income average and welfare of society, and accelerated social and economic developments in the countries have led to a rapid increase in waste production, and a change in the consumption pattern resulted in a change in the quality of solid waste.

Site Selection for the Waste Landfills the City of Eyvan-e Gharb.

In the present study, the required maps and information were collected from various resources and transformed into data layers to be used in the ArcGIS software environment with respect to the effective factors in site selection. AHP was employed as a decision-making technique due to its prevalent and effective application for assessing the suitability for landfill.

Studied Areas: 

The city of Eyvan location falls at 33° 50' N, 46° 20'.

The Criteria for this study are as follows: Land use, soil type and land capability, quality and depth of groundwater, geology, the intensity of rainfall, heights, grading, distance from the city, distance from the village, distance from the fault, distance from the river, distance from the road, distance from power transition lines, distance from well and fountain, distance from protected areas.

The most suitable location included 7.98% of the area of the region.

The development and expansion of urbanization and the subsequent increase in travel demand in recent years have made cities face problems such as traffic, lack of suitable and sufficient parking spaces, environmental issues, etc. At the same time, public transportation, especially Bus system, is of particular importance in the development of urban functions. Therefore, addressing the various aspects of this system to increase its efficiency will be a step towards solving the mentioned problems. The stations of the bus system are one of the important components of this system and if they are established in suitable places, it will increase the efficiency and performance of this system. Therefore, in this research, we tried to identify the effective parameters in the location and distribution of urban bus stations, and based on that, the spatial distribution of bus stations was analyzed and evaluated. In order to achieve this goal, by using different analytical functions in the GIS environment and using the AHP model, the location of the bus stations in the zoom 4 of Tabriz was analyzed and evaluated based on the selected criteria The results show that the bus stations do not fully cover the area of Tabriz 4 and their standard distance from each other is not respected. But in general, the final map obtained from the AHP model shows the desired pattern of the spatial distribution of bus stations.

One of the most critical responsibilities of bank managers is liquidity management. The purpose of this study is to design and implement a combined mathematical model of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Goal Programming (GP) for bank liquidity management. Initially, a conceptual model was drawn up, followed by the definition of model variables based on the bank's financial statements. Due to the presence of multiple, conflicting goals and the differing importance of each goal, the GP technique was utilized. The weighted nature of the GP model allowed for the calculation of the importance of ratios affecting the bank's liquidity within the objective function through the Analytical Hierarchy Process. The model was solved, and the analytical results were presented to bank officials. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed model was validated through a survey of seven main questions related to seven evaluation dimensions from 30 banking experts. Given the similarities in banking systems in the country, with minor modifications, the proposed model and pattern of this research could provide the necessary foundations for efficient liquidity management in other banks as well as help other Iranian banks to enhance their liquidity management efficiency with some adjustments.

Throughout history, nature has always exhibited its harsh face to human beings via destructive phenomena like avalanches, floods, volcanoes, earthquakes, etc. These disasters and dangers are part of life, always threatening humankind. With the human societies’ intellectual growth as well as the understanding of the causes of accidents, human being strived to find ways to deal with and reduce risks.Given its proximity to the active fault in the north of Karaj metropolis (Iran) and its unbalanced development, as well as its migrability, this city has old, worn-out, and marginalized structures, particularly in the areas adjacent to its potential northern fault.In recent years, the establishment of crisis management support bases has been placed on the agenda of the metropolises’ organizations for crisis prevention and management. One of the significant things prior to establishing these bases is to study, check, and select the suitable geographical location for establishing this type of application. This is an applied research in terms of purpose, carried out by descriptive-analytical method.In the present research, it is tried to examine the effective factors and criteria to identify the suitable place for the establishment of the central crisis management support base in city of Karaj through using the available resources.The current research is mainly aimed at investigating the feasibility of establishing a central crisis management support base in Karaj metropolis and selecting the most appropriate place to establish this base.This study seeks to answer the questions below:1- What are the effective parameters and factors of location to optimally select the location of the central crisis management support base in Karaj metropolis?2- Where is the most suitable place to establish the central crisis management support base in Karaj metropolis?

In the present study, we were aimed at finding the best location for establishing the central crisis management support base in Karaj metropolis.Initially, the current situation of Karaj metropolis was investigated from the physical and social viewpoints. Subsequently, using library studies as well as the crisis management experts and scholars’ opinions, the factors and parameters effective in the optimal location of the central crisis management support base in Karaj metropolis were identified. Moreover, the privacy and criteria for each of the identified layers in locating the bases were considered to accordingly identify the appropriate locations for the establishment of the central crisis management support base in Karaj.Furthermore, AHP model was employed to specify each of the criteria’s importance and value and effective elements in decision-making; the weight of each of the decision elements was also determined by Hierarchical Analysis Process method and Expert Choice software. Finally, combining the layers led to obtaining the general location map of the central crisis management support bases in Karaj metropolis.

After specifying the effective natural and human criteria, these criteria were weighted through using the pairwise comparison technique (analytical hierarchy process/AHP) and the Expert Choice software.In the following step, all information layers were combined in the Geographical Information System (GIS) and the location map of the central crisis management support base in Karaj was classified into five classes (strongly suitable, suitable, medium, unsuitable, and strongly unsuitable) and five positions were introduced as the recommended places to establish this base.The eastern region of Karaj was classified in the unsuitable to medium range in terms of creating the crisis management support base.The base location is among the considerable important parameters in the location of bases. The base location should be located in the geometric center of the region so that it is quickly and easily accessible throughout the region.

According to the expert opinions and reviewing the available documents and studies, the following five criteria were determined to select the ideal location: Road access network Gravity and geographic centrality Land with a larger and more appropriate area (more than 2000 m2) Distance from the fault Proximity to the hospital Besides, using AHP method, after determining the hierarchy levels including the purpose, criteria, and options, a pairwise comparison between the sets was performed for weighting. The criteria were compared two by two according to the purpose, and pairwise comparisons were performed based on the 1-9 range of scores.The overall comparison of the options was performed with respect to the goal and after weighting all the criteria and options; the comparisons’ results were then presented in the form of weight charts; ultimately, the final location map was determined through selecting the option having the most weight among the five options.Investigation of the five final options based on the determined indicators resulted in the selection of an area near Shahid Kalantari Terminal of Karaj as the best location to establish a support base for the central crisis management support base in Karaj metropolis.

The aim of this study was to investigate obstacles affecting the commercialization process of research finding of Iran Space Research center as one of the leading research centers in the field of innovative space technologies. This research is a part of the study of the commercialization research plan of all the products of the research center with a focus on non-space applications. The statistical sample included 30 experts and managers of the research center. Interviews were used for data collection in the qualitative approach, and questionnaires were used in the quantitative approach. The findings of the qualitative approach identified five main categories and twenty-six sub-factors as effective obstacles in the commercialization , while the quantitative approach findings included the prioritization of all main and sub-factors. The research results showed that the main obstacles included financial and economic issues, lack of skilled and capable human resources, the immaturity level of technology, inadequate collaboration between the Iran Space Research Institute and industrial centers, and the absence of suitable customer-employer networks, with sub-categories of these factors also being prioritized. The quantitative findings of the research showed that in terms of economic and financial issues, the factor of the "lack of sufficient governmental funding for profitable researches", in terms of skilled and capable human resources, "salaries and wages" and in terms of technological maturity, "weak ability to buy licenses of products related to researches" in terms of customer-employer network,"insufficient information due to weak information systems" and in terms of the research institute-industry cooperation, " insufficient knowledge of the industry related to institute and its potential and the industry's weak trust to the center's research results and participation in related investments have been the most important sub-factors in commercialization of research findings and research institute products, and managers should prioritize solving these problems.

One of the issues which internationally is important in the oil industry is related to the Upstream industry of oil contracts. Changes made in these contracts consist of differences made directly in relation to the importance of the number of hydrocarbon sources and the number of shares each party is going to gain. If more structure of these contracts is emphasized and fortified, more duties and places of each party will be complicated. In this research, the comparison is made between two contract models which have been recently proposed and overviewed. The criterion used in selected contracts is from the National Iranian south oil company (NISOC) and Iranian Petroleum Contracts (IPC). The research has concentrated on the efficient economic cost role used in these contracts. A questionnaire was conducted based on the analytical hierarchy process, and a survey was conducted among the professionals of the oil industry. The results showed that most of those who participated in the survey agreed that the National Iranian South Oil Company’s Contract (NISOC) has a better criterion for the efficient role in economic cost

Using effective and efficient criteria in choosing the investment portfolio can provide the most profitability for individual and institutional investors. Therefore, it seems necessary to choose a hybrid method to create a portfolio that shows better performance. The purpose of this study is to provide a model that can combine Multi-criteria decision-making techniques and Markowitz's mean-variance model, in different periods, to create an optimal portfolio that maximizes shareholder profits. The proposed model was implemented in three steps. In the first step, using the AHP technique, utilizing the opinion of experts, comparing different decision options based on the fundamental and technical criteria effective in decision making and prioritizing the mentioned criteria during the period from June 2016 to June 2021, among industries Activists in the Tehran Stock Exchange were selected as top industries. In the second step, from selected industries, three portfolios with one-month, six-month, and one-year periods were selected using the CoCoSo technique. In the third step, using the Markowitz model in the expressed time period, optimal portfolios were created on the efficient frontier. The results of this study showed that this hybrid proposed model will give more returns to investors according to the risk in different time periods.

This research presents a model for evaluating the quality of financial statements in the Iranian banking industry, which is practical and qualitative-quantitative in terms of type of research.First with an in-depth study of the library domestic and international resources, guidelines of the Basel Committee, circulars and instructions of the Central Bank and the Securities and Exchange Commission of Iran were extracted from the initial list of factors. Then, by fuzzy Delphi method, final factors that were effective in evaluating the quality of financial statements were identified. In the next step, using the AHP method, coefficient of importance of dimensions and factors was determined, and an appropriate model was presented.The results show that the corporate governance dimension with a coefficient of 0.58 has the greatest impact, followed by disclosure and transparency with a coefficient of 0.42. In the final model, which consists of 30 factors, the independent auditor's report factor and the capital adequacy ratio, each with a significance coefficient of 0.099, the highest and The factor of disclosing the quality of facilities based on the field of customer activity with a coefficient of 0.005 is the least important in evaluating the quality of banks' financial statements. Also, the rate of Inconsistency of dimensions and factors is less than 0.10 and is acceptable.

The purpose of this study was to identify and prioritize the performance evaluation indicators of Shiraz health sports clubs from the viewpoint of club managers using the AHP method. The research method was descriptive-analytical and field-based. The statistical population was all managers of health sports clubs in Shiraz (425 people), 60 of whom were selected as samples. To identify performance evaluation indicators by reviewing the literature and the background of the research, a list of indicators was developed and provided to 10 sports management specialists. After summing up the comments, the final framework of the indicators was compiled in the form of 5 general indicators and 28 sub-indicators, and their relative weight and rank were calculated. The findings showed that the most important indicators of performance evaluation of Shiraz  health sport clubs were, respectively, human resources facilities and equipment (0/29), services and access (0/20), legal and insurance (0/19), safety And health (0/156) and ethics and excellence (0/152). Therefore, it is recommended that health sports club managers pay special attention to human resources, facilities and equipment and to use their resources and capital in order to strengthen this factor in order to be able to rank in higher grades of performance.

Iran has seen significant growth in the amount and number of financing methods over the past few years. However, no significant research has been conducted on the differences in methods related to the financing chain of technology and knowledge-based units in the Iranian ecosystem. For this purpose, the present research has been carried out with the aim of developing a suitable model of financing methods and ranking its criteria in Iran. This study is a mixed-exploratoryinvestigation in terms of its nature and practical in terms of purpose. In the first step, semi-structured interviews with science and technology parks were conducted in order to identify the existing structures for attracting financial resources, and in the next step, using the hierarchical analysis process, these methods were ranked. For this purpose, questionnaires were distributed among entrepreneurs and experts who were active in the field of financing in 2021, and the obtained data were analyzed and the weight of each method was determined. The results support the main proposition that among the factors related to financing tools, smart money and future growth and development have the greatest impact on decision making. Also, entrepreneurs in Iran use facilities with hard commitments and supportive rates, and facilities with soft commitment and market rates as the first and second priority sources of financing. In addition, Equity-based financing has the lowest priority for financing.

Today, the environment is considered as one of the most important pillars of sustainable development, and the development of other economic and social sectors depends on sustainability and its proper functioning. In this regard, the main purpose of this study is to integrate environmental considerations, apply the real costs of the value of environmental goods and services in the country's policies and programs, tax resources and also propose a model for preparing a social accounting matrix, which are important tools. Introduced for sustainable planning. The purpose of this study is to examine more closely the quantitative link between economic activities, economic and social institutions, environment and energy in the form of social accounting system in Iran. Considering that no special work has been done in this field of research in Iran, and considering the importance of this issue in the world, as well as since the interrelationship between the economy and the environment in Iran is very important and the country Iran is one of the most polluted countries in the world in terms of environmental pollution; The need for research to examine the relationship between economic, social and environmental systems is essential. In this study, the Iranian social accounting matrix is introduced by considering the considerations related to tax and environmental components.

The purpose of this study is to identify and rank the methods of promoting the culture of using natural resources. For this purpose, based on the opinion of experts in the field of natural resources, 8 main criteria and 12 sub-indicators were selected for designing the questionnaire. Then, based on the information obtained from the questionnaire, which was completed by experts in the field of natural resources, weighting and ranking of indicators were performed using EXPERT CHOICE software and the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method, which is one of the valid techniques in the field of Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM). The research findings indicate that among the eight criteria, the criteria of "facilitating participatory learning", "development of critical thinking" and "existence of interaction" are more important, respectively. The final analysis showed that the three criteria mentioned in the context of participatory methods are the most effective way to promote the culture of resource use and the environment.